Target partition size is smaller than source
-
Also, for reference; minimum partitions:
$ cat d1.minimum.partitions label: dos label-id: 0x552e1400 device: /dev/sda unit: sectors /dev/sda1 : start= 63, size= 80262, type=de /dev/sda2 : start= 81920, size= 20423324, type=7, bootable /dev/sda3 : start= 24686592, size= 88663008, type=7
-
Any other thoughts or ideas to try and help debug this?
-
Is it the same problem as i described here ?
https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/5165/partition-size-too-little-with-a-single-disk-resizable-image-svn-3537Can you compare your d1.minimum.partitions with the output of a
fdisk /dev/sda -lu
-
@g.chanaud I could be wrong, but the d1.minimum.partitions and d1.original.partitions are both displayed here.
What I do notice, both of these forums are working from an image with a start sector of 63.
What’s most interesting to me, is the fdisk shown size, vs. the d1.minimum.partitions size are two different numbers.
In contewit’s particular case, it’s down by one meg.
-
Hi Tom,
the OP showed both d1.minimum.partitions and d1.original.partitions but not the output of the real partitions size created by the scripts, as it could be shown with a fdisk, that’s why i asked him to post the output, to compare theory VS reality, to be sure it’s the same problem.
As we can see the first partition is a dell Utility partition (type de) like in my case. Maybe this is a particular dell behavior… -
I’m nearly certain it’s specific to Dells at this point. I have others who’ve told me they have seen similar problems and fixed the problem by doing a full reinstall.
I’m not requesting you do this as I’d much rather have an imaging system that just works regardless of the layout of a disk.
-
@Tom-Elliott said:
I’m nearly certain it’s specific to Dells at this point. I have others who’ve told me they have seen similar problems and fixed the problem by doing a full reinstall.
I’m not requesting you do this as I’d much rather have an imaging system that just works regardless of the layout of a disk.
Manufacturers installations >> crap lol
-
@Tom-Elliott said:
I’m nearly certain it’s specific to Dells at this point. I have others who’ve told me they have seen similar problems and fixed the problem by doing a full reinstall.
I’m not requesting you do this as I’d much rather have an imaging system that just works regardless of the layout of a disk.
Just adding to your hunch… I was dealing with this exact same error at another location this morning and yesterday afternoon.
It’s on Dell 7010s.
A little information… the image is not a scratch image, it had three partitions. System reserved, recovery, and the primary Windows partition.
The image had been uploaded and downloaded several times in the last two-ish years through Norton GHOST.
MORE info - these Dells came with a custom image installed on them at the processing center before they were shipped to us. I don’t know what methods the processing center uses to clone HDDs.
Building an image from scratch does fix the issue… and I really dislike re-using old images, but it was sorta necessary in this special case. We still don’t have it figured out. We removed the recovery partition, fixed the MBR to boot windows properly, and it still bombs out when restoring.
I’ve also tried RAW… no dice.
-
Think I found something on it…
The Dell-specific Ctrl+F11 process is supposed to completely automate the restoration process, returning the hard disk to the state it was in when Dell shipped the computer. However, overwriting the MBR by using a boot manager, using the commands “fixmbr” or “fdisk /mbr”, installing from a Windows installation CD, and assorted other tasks a user might do will inadvertantly break Ctrl+F11, rendering the system unable to boot the DSR partition. Furthermore, changing the partitioning by adding, deleting, or resizing partitions will cause DSRcheck to fail, so even if Ctrl+F11 works, the restore process will abort without attempting to restore the Ghost image.
These may include, but are not limited to, using cloning/imaging products like Symantec Ghost, PowerQuest Drive Image, Acronis True Image, TeraByte Image or BootIt-NG, and others.
http://www.goodells.net/dellrestore/fixes.shtml
Seems like a good starting place for solving this…
-
Oh, to make it clear what the problem is, this dell specific Ctrl+F11 recovery thing is causing a mismatch in MBR size.
Of course, a scratch image works fine though.
-
# fdisk /dev/sda -lu Disk /dev/sda: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 60801 cylinders, total 976773168 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes Disk identifier: 0x552e1400 Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 63 80324 40131 de Dell Utility Partition 1 does not start on physical sector boundary. /dev/sda2 * 81920 20505243 10211662 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT /dev/sda3 24686592 976771071 476042240 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
-
@Developers is there anything we can do to manually make the imaging process make the MBR bigger by one meg? Can we swap around the figures in d1.minimum.partitions ?
-
Is there a debug process where I can show/record the commands that are being executed on the imaged machine? It would make it easier to debug the script.
Thanks.
-
@contewit You might not need to worry about it. I’m currently in the process of getting one of these broke Dell images to Tom, and he’s going to mess around with it.
For the commands being executed, I don’t think there is any method to “show” them… However, if you look into the several scripts that are used, they all have variables. Those begin with $ signs.
You can echo the contents of variables like this:
echo $VariableNameIsCaseSensitive
Check this out, too: http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Bash-Prog-Intro-HOWTO-5.html