Network fails on compatibility test
-
Chipset Vendor: Intel
Chipset Model: Q45/Q43
Chipset Revision: 03 -
Can you give my latest kernel build a shot?
[url]https://mastacontrola.com/fogboot/kernel/bzImage[/url]
[url]https://mastacontrola.com/fogboot/kernel/bzImage32[/url] -
I’m having trouble with the network cards as well in the Dells
So far I’ve tested the Dell OptiPlex 755 and receiving errors on the console reporting over and over.
DHCP/BOOTP: Ignoring fragmented reply
DHCP/BOOTP: Reply not for us
DHCP/BOOTP: Ignoring fragmented reply
IP-Config: Reopening network devices…about about 3 or 4 minutes it loads but shows the network adapter as not available and lists it as failed.
I have tested with the latest kernel on the kernel updates as well as the ones from your website.
Both have the same issues.The Dell 755 is listed as a Q35 Express chip and the network adapter is listed as Intel 82566DM-2 in windows.
I haven’t had a chance to check any other Dell Desktop yet.
Cheers,
-
[quote=“Tom Elliott, post: 29283, member: 7271”]Can you give my latest kernel build a shot?
[url]https://mastacontrola.com/fogboot/kernel/bzImage[/url]
[url]https://mastacontrola.com/fogboot/kernel/bzImage32[/url][/quote]This did not resolve the issue.
-
Can you provide a screen shot?
I can assure you, my kernels have the e1000e drivers. As a matter of fact, the one I had you try last night has nearly anything related to Intel enabled.
-
[quote=“Tom Elliott, post: 29331, member: 7271”]Can you provide a screen shot?[/quote]
[url]http://imgur.com/3pPIfpG,9dZI68T,0SB6nVd,b9c9ZHn,pqe4p2p,hlGcwxu#0[/url]
Edit for context: The first image hangs like that for a couple minutes, the the second picture hangs for a bit as well. Then it skips all the FOG info and says it can’t be registered and gives my system info. The it just attempts to inventory until I put it out of it’s misery.
-
[quote=“Jordon Rapp, post: 29338, member: 24302”][url]http://imgur.com/3pPIfpG,9dZI68T,0SB6nVd,b9c9ZHn,pqe4p2p,hlGcwxu#0[/url][/quote]
Okay:
What steps did you use to update the kernel?
By it “sitting like this for a few minutes” is it not doing anything or does it go further, or you’re not patient enough for it?
-
I downloaded the kernel, drug it to my desktop, then in terminal:
[CODE]sudo mv ~/Desktop/bzImage32 /var/www/fog/service/ipxe[/CODE]I do wait for it, the rest of that album shows what happens
-
I know it’s rare, but could the NIC be bad?
-
hmmmmmm
You’re running 1.0.1 right?
I’ll bet the file that’s loading is bzImage, not bzImage32.
[code]sudo mv /var/www/fog/service/ipxe/bzImage /var/www/fog/service/ipxe/bzImage_05JUN2014
sudo mv /var/www/fog/service/ipxe/bzImage32 /var/www/fog/service/ipxe/bzImage32_05JUN2014
sudo wget -O /var/www/fog/service/ipxe/bzImage --no-check-certificate https://mastacontrola.com/fogboot/kernel/bzImage
sudo wget -O /var/www/fog/service/ipxe/bzImage32 --no-check-certificate https://mastacontrola.com/fogboot/kernel/bzImage32[/code] -
I am, 1.0.1 on Ubuntu 13 on a Dell Optiplex 755. I will run those commands real quick
-
Right after I select Perform Full Host Registration, it [I]does [/I]say
[QUOTE]/bzImage… ok[/QUOTE]
So this could be the problem -
[quote=“Jordon Rapp, post: 29349, member: 24302”]Right after I select Perform Full Host Registration, it [I]does [/I]say
So this could be the problem[/quote]
Why would that be a problem?
-
Could that possibly mean it’s loading bzImage, and not bzImage32, as you said?
-
That’s expected in 1.0.1.
bzImage is 64 bit, bzImage32 is 32 bit.
That means you’re loading init.xz and NOT init_32.xz.
If you copied bzImage32 as bzImage your system would panic.
There’s no issue, just want to make sure the right files are updated.
-
I think I’m narrowing it down to hardware, and not software. I’ve tried many kernels, and everything is open on the network.
-
So do you have any “identical” systems that you could test with?
-
We do have a few more 780’s around the branch, our SVP has one and is leaving soon, I will check when he leaves in an hour.
-
[quote=“Tom Elliott, post: 29362, member: 7271”]So do you have any “identical” systems that you could test with?[/quote]
Well, bad or good news, depending on how you look at it. The other 780 I tried, while a different version of 780, did the same exact thing as the previous 780 I was working on.
-
I have disabled RAID for the drives (the Wiki says that was a problem) to no avail.
