FOG User Tracking -Search
-
Good, the values are changing.
there is also an execution time limit that should be set in one of the ini / conf files as well. I believe the setting is
max_execution_time
which I think takes a value in seconds and defaults to 30. you may want to play with that value to see if you can get a response in a reasonable time. It may take upwards of a minute or two depending on how many entries are getting pulled. -
This post is deleted! -
@Daniel-Miller said in FOG User Tracking -Search:
Good, the values are changing.
there is also an execution time limit that should be set in one of the ini / conf files as well. I believe the setting is
max_execution_time
which I think takes a value in seconds and defaults to 30. you may want to play with that value to see if you can get a response in a reasonable time. It may take upwards of a minute or two depending on how many entries are getting pulled.So far I have changed the /etc/php.ini max_execution_time = 300 with no luck.
[Fri Dec 06 14:20:04.488209 2019] [proxy_fcgi:error] [pid 2045] (70007)The timeout specified has expired: [client 192.168.10.170:63425] AH01075: Error dispatching request to :, referer: http://10fogserver.mtstrans.com/fog/management/index.php?node=report&sub=file&f=dXNlciB0cmFja2luZw==```
-
@Daniel-Miller said in FOG User Tracking -Search:
Good, the values are changing.
It may take upwards of a minute or two depending on how many entries are getting pulled.
I checked the userTracking table in the fog database and it has 22104 records
By the way, this hasn’t worked for us for quite some time, I just never got around to reporting it.
but now I have been getting a lot of requests for reports and it was nice to be able to quickly generate what time a user logged into the pc. -
@Greg-Plamondon said in FOG User Tracking -Search:
I checked the userTracking table in the fog database and it has 22104 records
You can keep pushing execution time out, but it is quite possible that you may have too many entries for php to handle the data in a reasonable time frame, especially if this instance has been running for a while. If you don’t need the historical data, truncating the userTracking table (
truncate table fog.usertracking
) as suggested in https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/11713/503-service-unavailable-error/54 should get it up and running and will show data going forward until it gets too ungainly again. -
@Daniel-Miller said in FOG User Tracking -Search:
@Greg-Plamondon said in FOG User Tracking -Search:
I checked the userTracking table in the fog database and it has 22104 records
You can keep pushing execution time out, but it is quite possible that you may have too many entries for php to handle the data in a reasonable time frame, especially if this instance has been running for a while. If you don’t need the historical data, truncating the userTracking table (
truncate table fog.usertracking
) as suggested in https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/11713/503-service-unavailable-error/54 should get it up and running and will show data going forward until it gets too ungainly again.I was able to truncate the table and then run a report. I wish i was able to store more records.
-
While I have no grounds to substantiate the claim, I really believe 1.6 will handle this kind of thing much better. Sure I don’t have 22k worth of entries (or more depending on the use case) in my userTracking table, but now that we have pagination, things should be a little better here. This, of course, makes reporting for “all” of the rows a little more difficult. But at least it allows searching and viewing information a little simpler without having to go to the extreme of truncating the whole table.
I’m sorry it took so long for us to have this implemented.
-
@Tom-Elliott said in FOG User Tracking -Search:
1.6
I have ## Version: 1.5.7.56 installed…
what repo is 1.6 in? -
@Greg-Plamondon said in FOG User Tracking -Search:
what repo is 1.6 in?
should be able to do a
git checkout working-1.6
, if I recall. -
Of note, I’m calling it 1.6 because when we do release it, that’s what this will become.
It is using the current latest version (1.5.7) and the .XXX after is the number of commits ahead of the master branch the working-1.6 branch is at.