"Hard Disk not Found!" Lenovo
-
Hey Ozzy, this is awesome of you to do! I have the same problem as x23piracy with the Kernel I compile being 8 mb and the default one is 12 mb. Why is there a difference? I tried both the Kitchensink and the Core kernel configs and it makes no difference on the size. I’m curious as to how you get yours to be 12 mb? I can enable everything basically and it doesn’t seem to change the file size, any idea what is going wrong? I did not start off with enabling everything fyi, just wanted to see if that made a difference and it didn’t.
Thank you Ozzy!
-
Hi,
is QT4 really needed? i mean i can remember that i’ve seen a message like qt4 not available using qt3.
Jason do you have qt4 installed? me not!
I also don’t want to enable everything, i think the better way is to add slowly.Greetz X23
-
A few answers I do have. First, you don’t need qt4 because, yes, if you have qt3 installed I believe that will work. Next, if you use the kitchen sink to compile, the file size is much smaller than the core compile. I’m not sure what determines the file size except maybe the kernel source you use and how many additional drivers are selected. For the file I uploaded I used Linux-3.10-rs1 and the latest is 3.10-rs2. What have you guys been using? Core? Ks? And what Linux kernel?
[SIZE=13px][FONT=Tahoma][COLOR=#141414][quote=“Jason Garrison, post: 12352, member: 1188”]I have the same problem as x23piracy with the Kernel I compile being 8 mb and the default one is 12 mb. Why is there a difference? I tried both the Kitchensink and the Core kernel configs and it makes no difference on the size.[/quote][/COLOR][/FONT][/SIZE]
Jason,
I compiled a new kernel using Linux kernel 3.9.3 (stable) and Kitchen Sink. The file size is around 5 Mb and I only added the C600 SCSI driver. I then used the same Linux kernel (3.9.3) and used Core instead and just selected the C600 driver. The CORE kernel is almost 12 Mb. Additionally, the CORE kernel took over twice as long to compile versus the kitchen sink one. I believe that CORE utilizes many more drivers hence the file size and processing time.Core Kernel (Linux 3.9.3):
[url]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/61767344/ozzy_core_3.9.3-bzImage[/url]Kitchen Sink Kernel (Linux 3.9.3):
[url]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/61767344/ozzy_KS_3.9.3-bzImage[/url] -
Alright, idk why my files were the same size. I must have done something wrong, but no matter I will try again. Thank you for the download links, hopefully they will point me in the right direction as to where I went wrong. I appreciate it Ozzy! Have a good day.
-
Hi,
has someone of you guys wiki write access to add some information to the howto compile a kernel page?
I think the information that menuconfig can be used instead of xconfig if no xserver is installed is important!Greetz X23
-
Hi,
i’ve now compiled a new kernel with 3.10-rc3 sources, i still cannot get it to boot,
i enabled the intel c600 driver.I have the following system:
Nvidia Quadro 4000
Intel C600/X79
Xeon E5This is what i get when i try to boot the kernel, the kernel works fine on other or older hardware:
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/eF1WcdY.jpg[/IMG]
Any idea what is missing or must be enabled through the kernel?
Greetz X23
-
I believe its the Quadro 4000. My buddy had a similar issue with a Quadro 2000d, Kernel Panic Error. What he said he did was remove the video driver on the kernel and it should go generic. He was then able to FOG with the vid card on the system.
-
Hi,
[quote=“Ozzy, post: 12399, member: 3595”]I believe its the Quadro 4000. My buddy had a similar issue with a Quadro 2000d, Kernel Panic Error. What he said he did was remove the video driver on the kernel and it should go generic. He was then able to FOG with the vid card on the system.[/quote]
i will first try to remove the quadro and boot then lets see what will happen, i will report back.
Similar machines that work have a Quadro 2000 and there is my kernel working, it’s only the Quadro 4000.
Greetz X23
-
Hi,
@Ozzy i had success, removing the nouveau nvidia driver from kernel will force it to use generic and it will boot,
but now i have another really strange problem:[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/DmvDP1k.jpg[/IMG]
The machine tells me Invalid Argument while mounting the nfs but this works with every other machine i test! (with standard kernel) Only this machines tells me invalid argument! (using custom kernel)
What went wrong here and how could it be that a single machine cannot mount the nfs? should i try this custom kernel the other ones, maybe it’s a kernel nfs problem?!
Any clues?..very strange behaviour
[B]EDIT:[/B]
I have tried the kernel i used with the other machines they all now tell me invalid argument, so this is a problem with the kernel, but i only removed the nvidia driver nothing else! Damn now i stuck hardly.
I don’t know what to do now
[B]EDIT2:[/B]
i compiled the custom kernel with latest 3.10 rc3 maybe there is the problem i will try latest stable 3.9.4 and will report back, this will happen earliest @next tuesday!
@Ozzy you only tried with rc2 right?
Greetz X23
-
Yep linux-3.10-rc2 is what I used in the tutorial.
-
Hi,
about the nvidia driver:
[media=youtube]iYWzMvlj2RQ[/media]
So Nvidia uk you
Greetz X23
-
Hi,
@MOD (Staff) can this thread maybe moved to tutorials beginning from post #5,
with a redirecting link within this thread? @Ozzy would this be ok for you?Edit: latest core.config:
[url]http://freeghost.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/freeghost/trunk/kernel/core.config[/url]Greetz X23
-
[quote=“x23piracy, post: 12409, member: 3982”]Hi,
@Ozzy i had success, removing the nouveau nvidia driver from kernel will force it to use generic and it will boot,
but now i have another really strange problem:[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/DmvDP1k.jpg[/IMG]
The machine tells me Invalid Argument while mounting the nfs but this works with every other machine i test! (with standard kernel) Only this machines tells me invalid argument! (using custom kernel)
What went wrong here and how could it be that a single machine cannot mount the nfs? should i try this custom kernel the other ones, maybe it’s a kernel nfs problem?!
Any clues?..very strange behaviour
[B]EDIT:[/B]
I have tried the kernel i used with the other machines they all now tell me invalid argument, so this is a problem with the kernel, but i only removed the nvidia driver nothing else! Damn now i stuck hardly.
I don’t know what to do now
[B]EDIT2:[/B]
i compiled the custom kernel with latest 3.10 rc3 maybe there is the problem i will try latest stable 3.9.4 and will report back, this will happen earliest @next tuesday!
@Ozzy you only tried with rc2 right?
Greetz X23[/quote]
Based on the screenshot, I remember a similar error to what you get there.
What I did to fix that was on the actual Fog server goto your “File system” select images/dev folder. Technically the folder should be empty(I think).
I had to delete what was in there for it to actually image.
For me it was a folder that had gibberish. I believe that the image saves there as a temp and moves when completed. Pretty much had a image in limbo.
Dont know if this helps, but I figured I would share
-
Hi,
[quote=“Kingtut343, post: 12459, member: 4069”]Dont know if this helps, but I figured I would share[/quote]
i’ve tried that and i have the same problem, also i wrote with the standard kernel it works so this must be a kernel nfs problem.
Iam actually compiling a new 3.9.4 stable kernel with the latest core.config.Any way thanks for your idea
I will report back if this is working!
Greetz X23
-
HI x23piracy, are you by any chance trying to use fog on a HP z820 or something similar? Looks like our hardware is quite similar but every time I seem to fix an issue, another one arise. Let us know how it goes with your kernel.
And again, thanks everyone for your valuable inputs, much appreciated!! -
Hi,
[quote=“ttcircus, post: 12469, member: 984”]…are you by any chance trying to use fog on a HP z820 or something similar?[/quote]
i have the following hw:
HP 6005, 6305 and 8000
Lenovo Notebooks a hand full of different seriesThe Kernel i compiled today (linux 3.9.4 latest stable and latest core.config) couldn’t be tested today, i will try it tomorrow and report back.
Greetz X23
-
Hi,
it’s a bit boring, now with latest stable 3.9.4 with latest core.config (just added c600 driver) i get a kernel panic
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/eMo7BMd.jpg[/IMG]
If i try the latest release candidates rc2 or rc3 it works but cannot mount nfs but this is not a nfs server problem older kernels are working there must be something wrong with nfs support or the core.config.
I will not longer try to make it running until someone more skilled could help me i don’t have any more fun with that damn thing.
EDIT:
Stupid me i forgot to disable the nvidia driver, because it will not work with a quadro 4000, will try and report back.
Greetz X23
-
Hi,
it is working now, the problem was the nvidia driver like i already wrote i just forgot the disable the nuovo nvidia driver.
The machine with the C600 SAS Controller is now working. YeahaaaaGreetz X23
-
[quote=“x23piracy, post: 12488, member: 3982”]Hi,
it is working now, the problem was the nvidia driver like i already wrote i just forgot the disable the nuovo nvidia driver.
The machine with the C600 SAS Controller is now working. YeahaaaaGreetz X23[/quote]
nice one! I swear I tried all this but mine doesn’t work
Any chance you could share that kernel? -
Hi,
[quote=“ttcircus, post: 12489, member: 984”]Any chance you could share that kernel?[/quote]
sure…
[url]http://www.multiupload.nl/UOQVLDZ7XB[/url]
Let me know if you had success and gimme the specs of your system not working (hw).
Which core.config did u used?
this one?: [url]http://freeghost.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/freeghost/trunk/kernel/core.config[/url]Greetz X23
