• Recent
  • Unsolved
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • Recent
  • Unsolved
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Fog snapins not ordered on launching time.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved
FOG Problems
3
6
591
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • E
    EduardoTSeoane
    last edited by Jun 3, 2019, 7:20 AM

    @Fernando-Gietz , @Sebastian-Roth .

    Recently updated to FOG 1.5.6.

    From the update from 1.4.2 to 1.5.5, and now updating to 1.5.6 we have the following trouble.

    The clients are getting the launched snapins ordered by name, not by launching time.

    I get this error with and without location module.

    W 1 Reply Last reply Jun 3, 2019, 11:24 PM Reply Quote 0
    • W
      Wayne Workman @EduardoTSeoane
      last edited by Wayne Workman Jun 3, 2019, 5:25 PM Jun 3, 2019, 11:24 PM

      @EduardoTSeoane I think snapins have always executed in alpha-numeric order.

      Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!
      Daily Clean Installation Results:
      https://fogtesting.fogproject.us/
      FOG Reporting:
      https://fog-external-reporting-results.fogproject.us/

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • E
        EduardoTSeoane
        last edited by Jun 4, 2019, 8:34 AM

        @Wayne-Workman , @Fernando-Gietz , @Sebastian-Roth

        I’m thinking about your post and I’ve done a revision of some computers’ history.

        And I can confirm that i have snapin sequences, that i know that they are executed on launching time order, not in alpha-numeric.

        BUT this has been caused by a procedure change.

        After reviewing the procedure and some tests I have noticed that:

        • a snapin sequence launched to computers is executed in alpha-numeric order

        • a snapin sequence launched to groups is executed in launching time order

        Thank’s for make me think a few.

        W 1 Reply Last reply Jun 4, 2019, 11:52 AM Reply Quote 0
        • S
          Sebastian Roth Moderator
          last edited by Jun 4, 2019, 9:34 AM

          @EduardoTSeoane Thanks for this update! Can we mark this solved then? It’s probably not ideal but we have too many other things on the list to fix. If you really want to see this changed then please open a issue on github as things in the forum tend to be lost in the mass of requests easily.

          Web GUI issue? Please check apache error (debian/ubuntu: /var/log/apache2/error.log, centos/fedora/rhel: /var/log/httpd/error_log) and php-fpm log (/var/log/php*-fpm.log)

          Please support FOG if you like it: https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/Support_FOG

          E 1 Reply Last reply Jun 4, 2019, 12:17 PM Reply Quote 0
          • W
            Wayne Workman @EduardoTSeoane
            last edited by Jun 4, 2019, 11:52 AM

            @EduardoTSeoane It sounds like you’re using groups to deploy several snapins at once? If that’s the case, as a work-around, I might suggest deploying 1 snapin at a time with groups. That way they happen in the order needed. Not optimal, I know.

            Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!
            Daily Clean Installation Results:
            https://fogtesting.fogproject.us/
            FOG Reporting:
            https://fog-external-reporting-results.fogproject.us/

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • E
              EduardoTSeoane @Sebastian Roth
              last edited by Jun 4, 2019, 12:17 PM

              @Sebastian-Roth yes, can be closed thanks.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • 1 / 1
              1 / 1
              • First post
                5/6
                Last post

              156

              Online

              12.0k

              Users

              17.3k

              Topics

              155.2k

              Posts
              Copyright © 2012-2024 FOG Project