• Recent
  • Unsolved
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • Recent
  • Unsolved
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Issues with Fog 1.5.2

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved
FOG Problems
4
44
6.0k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K
    K.Hays
    last edited by K.Hays Apr 30, 2018, 2:10 PM Apr 30, 2018, 2:34 PM

    OS: Ubuntu 16.04
    Fog Version: 1.5.2/ 1.5.0

    Recently, within the past month or so, we rebuilt our fog machine on a Hyper V server. We started mostly from scratch aside from CSV’s for the groups. We originally installed 1.5.0 and then updated when 1.5.2 came out. It all seemed to work well until last week. The first sign of trouble was when we tried to go to the web gui, It came up with an error along the lines of “Could not connect to database”. I figured this was caused from the issue stemming from Ubuntu. I ran the fix shown on the fog forums, and the gui came back up. The day after that we decided to re image a lab that was having some issues. It was the first time we’d tried a large deployment with the new server. We created the image fine, but when unicasting it to thirty computers 10, 5, and 2 at a time (we tried all of those to see if somehow it was just getting bogged down) the web gui would freeze and crash. The ones prompted to start would start, but the ones in queue would fall out of queue and show the error in the pictures below. We did a bit of experimenting but couldn’t figure it out. We had to get the lab up and running quick though so we went back to a checkpoint before we updated to Fog 1.5.2 and it seemed to work without issue. It is still working on 1.5.0, but I’m wondering why it bogged out when running 1.5.2? I can create another fog server on the hyper v and install 1.5.2 for testing if need be.0_1525098612839_imagejpeg_0.jpg0_1525118996208_Image3.jpg

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • K
      K.Hays
      last edited by Apr 30, 2018, 2:38 PM

      This post is deleted!
      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • G
        george1421 Moderator
        last edited by Apr 30, 2018, 3:00 PM

        will you confirm that this fix addresses your issue:
        https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/11797/updated-from-fog-v1-50-to-v1-52-issue/25

        Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

        K 2 Replies Last reply Apr 30, 2018, 3:16 PM Reply Quote 0
        • K
          K.Hays @george1421
          last edited by K.Hays Apr 30, 2018, 9:18 AM Apr 30, 2018, 3:16 PM

          @george1421 Similar, but not quite the same. I did stumble upon that post but didn’t know if that fix was right for me. Before i did the fix from here:https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/10006/ubuntu-is-fog-s-enemy
          I could not access the web interface at all. Even if i put /fog at the end. It was a blank page with “cannot connect to database.” Ran the fix and all was well or so it seemed. The client machines can, and do still connect to the fog server, and i can access the gui. It’s just that when im unicasting to the machines it’s like fog freezes. I say fog specifically because the computer is still running fine. This doesn’t happen with 1.5.0 though.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • K
            K.Hays @george1421
            last edited by Apr 30, 2018, 3:21 PM

            @george1421 If you’d like me to try it though I can do that 😄

            G 1 Reply Last reply Apr 30, 2018, 3:22 PM Reply Quote 0
            • G
              george1421 Moderator @K.Hays
              last edited by Apr 30, 2018, 3:22 PM

              @k-hays I would like you to check the website file for fog. The issue is also manifested if you just go to the fog web server root directory. Its not redirected to /fog, but displays some text like listed in the post.

              Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

              K 1 Reply Last reply Apr 30, 2018, 4:20 PM Reply Quote 0
              • K
                K.Hays @george1421
                last edited by Apr 30, 2018, 4:20 PM

                @george1421 This is what that file looks like post upgrade
                0_1525105164735_Website file fog.PNG

                G 1 Reply Last reply Apr 30, 2018, 5:14 PM Reply Quote 0
                • G
                  george1421 Moderator @K.Hays
                  last edited by Apr 30, 2018, 5:14 PM

                  @k-hays OK good then you don’t have the other issue we’ve been chasing.

                  OK I see your fog server is on the 10.100.0.253 subnet and your pxe booting client is on 10.10.0.232 subnet. Is that accurate? My intuition is telling me something is a bit strange here?

                  If the subnets are correct then do you have routing setup between the two subnets? Are there any screening routers (i.e. firewalls) between?

                  Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

                  K 2 Replies Last reply Apr 30, 2018, 6:13 PM Reply Quote 0
                  • K
                    K.Hays @george1421
                    last edited by K.Hays Apr 30, 2018, 12:15 PM Apr 30, 2018, 6:13 PM

                    @george1421 Yeah we have 6 different buildings with different ip ranges. This building is the high school, with a 10.10 ip range. The 10.100 range is also at the high school, but its in our server room. We have this all setup to work as weve been using fog for a few years now. We do have routing setup between subnets but not screening routers.

                    G 1 Reply Last reply Apr 30, 2018, 7:36 PM Reply Quote 0
                    • G
                      george1421 Moderator @K.Hays
                      last edited by Apr 30, 2018, 7:36 PM

                      @k-hays Ok so you’ve confirmed that from the 10.10.0.x subnet you can ping the fog server? If so then it may be that double backslash in the url after fog. If that is the case, please check the fog settings as well as the storage node configuration to see if you have a training backslash.

                      Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

                      K 1 Reply Last reply Apr 30, 2018, 7:59 PM Reply Quote 0
                      • K
                        K.Hays @george1421
                        last edited by Apr 30, 2018, 7:59 PM

                        Welp i goofed. I’m going to have to get that website file again for you because apparently i forgot to reinstall 1.5.2 before getting the file. If there are any differences between the two i will let you know. As far as your most recent question yes, we can ping from that subnet( The clients also do still connect, see second picture). There was not a second / in the storage node but there was under TFTP PXE KERNEL DIR

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • K
                          K.Hays
                          last edited by Jun 20, 2018, 2:27 PM

                          Due to hardware changes and accompanying issues (and time restraints) we are just reloading our fog server on a different machine. Sorry for the delay, summer is our busiest time and of course when we run into the most issues :,D Thank you though!

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • S
                            Sebastian Roth Moderator
                            last edited by Jun 20, 2018, 5:21 PM

                            @K-Hays So is this solved from your point of view?

                            Web GUI issue? Please check apache error (debian/ubuntu: /var/log/apache2/error.log, centos/fedora/rhel: /var/log/httpd/error_log) and php-fpm log (/var/log/php*-fpm.log)

                            Please support FOG if you like it: https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/Support_FOG

                            K 1 Reply Last reply Jun 20, 2018, 6:28 PM Reply Quote 0
                            • K
                              K.Hays @Sebastian Roth
                              last edited by Jun 20, 2018, 6:28 PM

                              @sebastian-roth Yessir!

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • K
                                K.Hays
                                last edited by Jun 22, 2018, 1:13 PM

                                Welpppp, I suppose not. We were running this server on a hyper v and decided to just try out to separate options. We had a new computer we were going to try and load it on, as well as setting up a new hyper v with debian instead. Both fresh installs had the same error when we tried to test either of them. I went ahead and checked the file the George mentioned prior ( On the Hyper V server) and this is the outcome.

                                0_1529673120560_FogForum.PNG

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • K
                                  K.Hays @george1421
                                  last edited by Jun 22, 2018, 1:39 PM

                                  @george1421 I adjusted the file to match what you put in this post https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/11797/updated-from-fog-v1-50-to-v1-52-issue/25

                                  Will test soon. Any other ideas?

                                  Q 1 Reply Last reply Jun 22, 2018, 1:47 PM Reply Quote 0
                                  • Q
                                    Quazz Moderator @K.Hays
                                    last edited by Quazz Jun 22, 2018, 7:49 AM Jun 22, 2018, 1:47 PM

                                    @k-hays Can you deploy an image to a single client without issue?

                                    This seems to me like an issue with PHP-FPM getting overloaded.

                                    On debian the pm.max_children directive is often stuck on 5 which is generally too low for most people. (40 is a good starting point for testing)

                                    K 1 Reply Last reply Jun 22, 2018, 1:50 PM Reply Quote 0
                                    • K
                                      K.Hays @Quazz
                                      last edited by K.Hays Jun 22, 2018, 7:50 AM Jun 22, 2018, 1:50 PM

                                      @quazz Yes. Single client works fine. I don’t know the specific number in which it starts to fail; but in a lab we image anywhere from 20 - 35ish computers and it seems to fail whenever we try those numbers. The issue also persisted when we started with ubuntu.

                                      Q 1 Reply Last reply Jun 22, 2018, 1:53 PM Reply Quote 0
                                      • Q
                                        Quazz Moderator @K.Hays
                                        last edited by Quazz Jun 22, 2018, 7:54 AM Jun 22, 2018, 1:53 PM

                                        @k-hays There’s currently some known issues with PHP-FPM settings/getting overloaded, particularily on debian based systems.

                                        I definitely recommend checking the pm.max_children value (not 100% sure where it is on debian)

                                        You should be able to check the PHP-FPM logs on the WebUI to see if it’s been complaining about not enough max_children or memory exhaustion or timeouts I think.

                                        K 1 Reply Last reply Jun 22, 2018, 1:55 PM Reply Quote 0
                                        • K
                                          K.Hays @Quazz
                                          last edited by Jun 22, 2018, 1:55 PM

                                          @quazz I’ll go digging. Any ideas?

                                          Q 1 Reply Last reply Jun 22, 2018, 1:56 PM Reply Quote 0
                                          • 1
                                          • 2
                                          • 3
                                          • 1 / 3
                                          • First post
                                            Last post

                                          157

                                          Online

                                          12.0k

                                          Users

                                          17.3k

                                          Topics

                                          155.2k

                                          Posts
                                          Copyright © 2012-2024 FOG Project