@chunter2 This domain does not exist or dcouldn’t be contacted seems to be indicative of the problem. Simply put, from the message you show, it seems the DNS isnt’ able to reach the domain controller.

I highly doubt this is due to the version of FOG based on this, but my perspective is obviously very limited at this point.

@ramone As far as I am aware, no one ever volunteered to take up the docker image maintenance. It’s essentially dead.
I think it’s possible in theory, you would just need volumes for the fog directories that need to be static between updates like the database and images, though there would surely be other fun issues with ports to work out. I personally see the desire for it if you’re in an environment where you already have lots of containers as a standard in your infrastructure, but I like having it just on its own server.
Is it not an option to start with a docker image that doesn’t already have a database on the default port? Or are you saying the docker host already has a database on said port?
I’m also sure we could figure out using an external database as storagenodes already connect to an external database. I would think that using docker for adding storage nodes might make some sense as you could put them all on one server and use volumes to mount disks from different sources.
However, the more virtualization and containerization you add, the more complication arises. Already once just on a virtual server you may not be able to use multi-cast imaging unless you’re able to add igmp snooping in your virtual networking. I don’t know if containers have that same limitation or other limitations that could be introduced.

This isn’t really a great answer I realize, and I apologize for that, but there’s a lot to consider with changing infrastructure.

Anyway, something you might try is to create a /opt/fog/.fogsettings file before installing and put in these settings

snmysqlpass='password' snmysqlhost='remoteHost' snmysqluser='fogmaster' mysqldbname='fog'

Then try the installer, no idea if it would work, but something to try as far as using an external database.

@gaptoothgonni So while this can be done, FOG is designed to capture an image from where windows is already installed and sysprep’d, not to boot to a wim. Of course it can be done, but I just wanted to make sure that’s clarified.

All that said, doing it that way may or may not get past your problem, because it may just be a client pc bios setting.
If you manually boot to that iso on a usb on that pc, does it see the disks?
That message generally means it’s missing the storage driver.
Does the host you’re trying to deploy to have VMD/RAID enabled in the bios settings?
It is possible, and not even that hard if you’re already customizing the iso, to add the storage driver to the wim. I’ve never used NTLite, but in powershell you can mount the wim of the image with Mount-WindowsImage and use Add-WindowsDriver to add the inf you need to that image. You probably need to mount the boot.wim and setup.wim images and add it there too as you’re booting to the boot.wim and using winpe. This page might also be helpful https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/deployment/update/media-dynamic-update#update-windows-installation-media

I would also say, if you’re going this route, to consider making a autounattend.xml if NTLite doesn’t do that, as it can automate the install of windows and then have it kick things off into provisioning. We customize an iso like this and use it to create and capture our base image in FOG.

I got a little off topic there, TL;DR
Make sure the disks are seen if you boot to the iso manually, if they are not, then adjust the bios/uefi settings to use AHCI mode for disks as it works universally. If the disks are seen when manually booting, then something else is causing it not to see the local hardware.