• Recent
    • Unsolved
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. yogipaolo
    3. Posts
    Y
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 3
    • Posts 18
    • Best 0
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Posts made by yogipaolo

    • RE: Gigabyte-ga-b75m-d3h-mata-motherboard

      The kernel published in my previous post does not work for me. I may be doing something wrong, but it did not work on three different computers I tried to PXE boot.

      I found this driver that is not upstream yet but this is for the Qualcom/Atheros ALX series.

      [url]http://www.orbit-lab.org/kernel/compat-wireless-3-stable/[/url]

      It appears that this is for the 3.6.x series kernel. I’m going to download this kernel and compile it with the latest driver listed on the link above.

      Wish me luck…

      EDIT: well crap, I have to look up how to compile this module into the new kernel. More later…
      I also did find that, under ubuntu, there is the “wireless-compat” package(s) which may contain alx drivers.

      [quote=“yogipaolo, post: 10395, member: 61”]Another reason why I love this community. I might be using a slightly different gigabyte mobo than you, but your board is likely to have a qualcom/atheros ar8161/8165 chip in it. This chip apparently is bluttooth as well as lan.

      A kind soul has posted this link with a direct link to a bzimage download:
      [url]http://fogproject.org/forum/threads/dell-2330-all-in-one-network-issue.1054/#post-8470[/url]

      I’m going to try this.

      I’m also busily compililng a 3.7.5 kernel for the hell of it. I’m going to see if I can use it as an alternative kernel. FOG has the ability to boot specific kernels for specific hosts (I think). This is configurable under host management >> host kernel[/quote]

      posted in Hardware Compatibility
      Y
      yogipaolo
    • RE: Gigabyte-ga-b75m-d3h-mata-motherboard

      Another reason why I love this community. I might be using a slightly different gigabyte mobo than you, but your board is likely to have a qualcom/atheros ar8161/8165 chip in it. This chip apparently is bluttooth as well as lan.

      A kind soul has posted this link with a direct link to a bzimage download:
      [url]http://fogproject.org/forum/threads/dell-2330-all-in-one-network-issue.1054/#post-8470[/url]

      I’m going to try this.

      I’m also busily compililng a 3.7.5 kernel for the hell of it. I’m going to see if I can use it as an alternative kernel. FOG has the ability to boot specific kernels for specific hosts (I think). This is configurable under host management >> host kernel

      posted in Hardware Compatibility
      Y
      yogipaolo
    • RE: Gigabyte-ga-b75m-d3h-mata-motherboard

      [quote=“rightshift, post: 10200, member: 3197”]To clarify. I can PXE boot on the machine in question - I can access fog menu - but I cannot do any inventory options as they simply don’t work. I thus have no way to deploy my image to these machines.

      Thanks,
      J[/quote]

      I am having the same issue. It hangs on “attempting to send inventory” and scrolls down one line at a time til the screen turns black…

      I added the machine to the inventory manually and got an upload task to start, but when it comes time to pull the image, i get the message “rpc error netowork not available”.

      So why would the LAN work enough to PXE boot but not to use NFS. I’m thinking a custom kernel might solve this, but I’d need to figure out what is going wrong first. The pressure is on at work and my boss is looking stressed, so I need to get the thing backed up. I"m going to use clonezilla and keep the image on a separate HD.

      I’ll keep you posted if I figure anything out…

      posted in Hardware Compatibility
      Y
      yogipaolo
    • RE: Clamav version update

      I found this link that may be helpful as I am about to do the same thing due to a nasty virus infection. Will keep you posted.

      [url]http://www.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/Clamav[/url]

      posted in General
      Y
      yogipaolo
    • RE: Is there a roadmap for FOG

      Fog is simply awesome. We’re moving closer to using it to replace altiris DS (version 8 i think…).

      Anyway, FOG is making my life at work so much easier. I have immense gratitude for the people who develop it. The forums are very friendly and the developers are kind, generous and patient with their time.

      I’d like to contribute something, but unfortunately, I’m not a coder. Besides coding, what other ways can I help the the project and the developers?

      Thanks

      posted in General
      Y
      yogipaolo
    • RE: Lenovo x130e

      This definitely worked for me as well!
      Thank you for this solution. I have 40 of these bad boys to image and I’m trying to impress my boss with fog. This will go a long way towards that aim.

      Would you mind filling us in on what mods you made to this kernel?

      I’m going to do some toying with the kernel this weekend.

      Thanks!
      [quote=“Eric, post: 2726, member: 83”]I posted my custom 3.3 Kernel in another thread. It resolved the snowy screen issue that I had on some of my Dells. Maybe it will help you too? Below is what I posted in another thread:

      I recently made my own Kernel as a proof of concept. Its based of the Linux 3.3 Kernel and it resolved a lot of problems for me. Its attached in my post here. Be sure to backup any of your existing Kernels in /tftpboot/fog/kernel/

      Let me know if it works for you.

      [url]http://scatteredspace.com/Fog/bzImage.zip[/url][/quote]

      posted in Hardware Compatibility
      Y
      yogipaolo
    • RE: FOG CLIENT

      [quote=“jjdlc, post: 2753, member: 877”]I just recently took over an organization with over 600 computers, and am looking at FOG to handle imaging. I was excited at the prospect of using a GPO to push the client to each machine and then have them auto register. Then I find out it isn’t working. I’ve done a bunch of reading and it looks like up until .28 it was, but in .29 they disabled the functionality for some reason and haven’t re-enabled it. I looked through the source code for .28 and .32, and it looks like they started updating hostregister.dll but haven’t finished it. Manually registering 600 computers is a daunting task. One thing I’ve thought about doing, is maybe installing .28 getting everything registered and then upgrading to .32 since I need support for Windows 7.[/quote]

      GARRGHH!!! I just promised my boss I can push the client out to existing computers and get an inventory. Now I’m going to look like a boob. Oh well, wouldn’t be the first time…

      I have a similar application for this feature. Installing .28 sounds like an interesting idea.
      I wonder also if it’s possible to only use the .dll from .28 or simply some of the code from .28 which makes the registration work automatically…

      posted in FOG Problems
      Y
      yogipaolo
    • RE: FOG Client and Host Registration

      [quote=“Raff, post: 3613, member: 298”]The windows fog client no longer register’s the clients, it was removed a couple of versions ago. You have to do it manually through pxe menu or import via web console.[/quote]

      [S]Your post is the first I’ve heard of this. Where did you get this information? The HostRegister.dll is still included in the fog program file folder. I see no other reference to the removal of this feature.[/S]

      Ok, after some digging, I see one other reference to this:
      [url]http://fogproject.org/forum/threads/fog-client.606/#post-2753[/url]

      I’d love to have this feature back. I wish I knew more about programming! Maybe I’ll change that…

      Anyway, how can I help get this feature back?
      Anyone think of some work-arounds?

      posted in FOG Problems
      Y
      yogipaolo
    • RE: Kernel Loading very slowly

      All the clients are connected to the gigabit switch and are using gigabit ports.

      [quote=“Zardan, post: 1859, member: 185”]Are the clients also connected to a gigabit switch? 10min for that size sounds like ~100mbit speeds.
      Ive had the exact same issue when imaging a computer lab that had a old switch with only 100mbit ports, replacing it with a switch that had 1000mbit uplink to the rest of the network fixed the issue for me. Tftp traffic seems to take big hit when the network is overloaded.
      If everything looks ok make sure the server have negotiated 1000mbit with the switch.[/quote]

      posted in FOG Problems
      Y
      yogipaolo
    • Kernel Loading very slowly

      I am running FOG 0.32 on Ubuntu server 10.04.4.

      When I try to image more than two computers at once, the PXE boot process takes as much at 5 minutes to load the kernel. I’ve tried increasing the ramdisk size and increasing the TFTPD block size. No joy.

      The server is connected to a gigabit port on our switch. Image load times are about 10 minutes for a 10-13GB image, so network speed does not seem to be an issue.

      Has anyone experienced this or does anyone have any suggestions on where to look?

      Paul

      posted in FOG Problems
      Y
      yogipaolo
    • RE: WOL Not working FOG .32

      [quote=“Blackout, post: 120, member: 1”]‘server_ip’ was 172.17.14.206, right?[/quote]
      That is correct.

      posted in FOG Problems
      Y
      yogipaolo
    • RE: WOL Not working FOG .32

      I see this when executing a WOL from advanced task menu
      [CODE]::1 - - [18/Dec/2011:20:23:37 -0500] “GET /fog/wol/wol.php?wakeonlan=f0🇩🇪f1:9e:d9:10 HTTP/1.1” 200 192 “-” “-”
      [/CODE]

      posted in FOG Problems
      Y
      yogipaolo
    • RE: WOL Not working FOG .32

      Ha!
      I changed FOG_WOL_HOST server_ip
      To FOG_WOL_HOST localhost
      and now it works!

      posted in FOG Problems
      Y
      yogipaolo
    • RE: WOL Not working FOG .32

      Yes, sorry I forgot to mention that.

      I went to the UI, other information > fog settings:
      FOG_WOL_HOST server_ip
      FOG_WOL_PATH /fog/wol/wol.php
      FOG_WOL_INTERFACE eth0

      posted in FOG Problems
      Y
      yogipaolo
    • RE: WOL Not working FOG .32

      [url]http://172.17.14.206/fog/wol/wol.php?wakeonlan=f0🇩🇪f1:61:xx:xx[/url]
      This worked!
      What next?
      This is very strange.
      It works directly… I wonder where things are breaking down.
      Wracking my brain to see what is different between the two installs…

      posted in FOG Problems
      Y
      yogipaolo
    • RE: Thank You ^ 100

      So far, I’m having lots of fun with the conversion. I’m getting 2.4GB a minute for a single machine deployment with the client on the same switch as the FOG server (or at least one hop away).

      The problem now I’m having is with WOL. I posted over in tech help section of the forum.
      I’ve also started experimenting with snap-ins with good success.
      Snap-ins will be the thing I need to sell hardest to my boss because we do use the altiris software push feature quite a bit…

      Anyway, there is plenty for me to play/experiment/learn with!

      PJW

      posted in General
      Y
      yogipaolo
    • WOL Not working FOG .32

      So I’ve moved my fog server 3 times. The reason for this is that I deployed FOG on a couple VMs for testing purposes. Also, it’s good practice. Migration is fairly straight-forward.

      I am running fog .32

      For moving servers, I followed the instructions in the wiki:
      [url]http://fogproject.org/wiki/index.php?title=Moving_Between_Servers[/url]

      On this 4th server, which is a physical machine (specs to follow), WOL simply does not work.
      WOL worked perfectly on the VMs.

      I have enabled WOL on all clients tested.

      All FOG servers were based on ubuntu 10.04.3LTS x86_64

      Current physical machine:
      [CODE]Linux Fog4 2.6.32-33-server #72-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jul 29 21:21:55 UTC 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux
      [/CODE]

      I’ve checked permissions in /var/www/fog (I don’t think x should be set…)
      [CODE]drwxr-xr-x 2 www-data www-data 4096 2011-12-18 16:23 wol

      -rw-r–r-- 1 www-data www-data 54 2011-12-18 16:23 index.php
      -rw-r–r-- 1 www-data www-data 1043 2011-12-18 16:23 wol.php[/CODE]

      I’ve made sure that the WOL server is set correctly in /var/www/fog/commons/config.php

      [CODE]define( “WOL_HOST”, “172.17.14.206” );
      define( “WOL_PATH”, “/fog/wol/wol.php” );
      define( “WOL_INTERFACE”, “eth0” );
      [/CODE]

      I even re-installed the server by moving /var/www/fog and /opt/fog and renaming .fogsettings

      Still no joy…

      Is there anything else I can try to diagnose this issue? I haven’t messed with ubuntu firewall and/or iptables yet, come to think of it…

      This is because I didn’t touch firewall before and things ran fine…
      I’ll give that a shot after I hit “post”.

      CPU specs below:
      [CODE]root@Fog4:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo
      processor : 0
      vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
      cpu family : 15
      model : 5
      model name : AMD Opteron™ Processor 246
      stepping : 10
      cpu MHz : 2008.884
      cache size : 1024 KB
      fpu : yes
      fpu_exception : yes
      cpuid level : 1
      wp : yes
      flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx mmxext lm 3dnowext 3dnow rep_good extd_apicid
      bogomips : 4017.76
      TLB size : 1024 4K pages
      clflush size : 64
      cache_alignment : 64
      address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
      power management: ts fid vid ttp

      processor : 1
      vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
      cpu family : 15
      model : 37
      model name : AMD Opteron™ Processor 246
      stepping : 1
      cpu MHz : 2008.884
      cache size : 1024 KB
      fpu : yes
      fpu_exception : yes
      cpuid level : 1
      wp : yes
      flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx mmxext lm 3dnowext 3dnow rep_good extd_apicid
      bogomips : 4018.65
      TLB size : 1024 4K pages
      clflush size : 64
      cache_alignment : 64
      address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
      power management: ts fid vid ttp
      [/CODE]

      Thanks, FOG forums!

      posted in FOG Problems
      Y
      yogipaolo
    • Thank You ^ 100

      Wow!
      First, let me say thank you to all the developers who made FOG possible.

      I work for a medium-sized private, non-profit school with a fairly thin tech budget. We are currently laboring with a 5 or 6 year-old installation of Altiris DS 6.8 on Win2k3. Altiris is a fine system, but it is cranky…
      I’ve been experimenting with FOG heavily over the past month and grow more impressed each day. I think that I can safely propose FOG to my supervisor as a superior replacement to Altiris.

      I look forward to supporting the project any way I can. I will certainly use FOG and report my findings here and possibly on the Wiki.

      Gratefully,

      Yogipaolo

      posted in General
      Y
      yogipaolo
    • 1 / 1