• Recent
    • Unsolved
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. Tom Elliott
    • Profile
    • Following 27
    • Followers 82
    • Topics 116
    • Posts 18,872
    • Groups 0

    Tom Elliott

    @Tom Elliott

    5.1k
    Reputation
    38.9k
    Profile views
    18.9k
    Posts
    82
    Followers
    27
    Following
    Joined
    Last Online

    Tom Elliott Unfollow Follow

    Best posts made by Tom Elliott

    • Gratitudes

      I know I’ve been out of this for a little bit. I check in here or there, but just been extremely busy.

      I don’t want to stop contributing, I just am taking time for myself after my workly duties.

      I have to give a big gratitude and thanks for everyone here trying to help out whether by code, by helping the rest of the community, or documentation.

      @Sebastian-Roth I know you’re busy but you’ve kept the project rolling even with the minimal availability you have. Thank you.
      @george1421 I’m sure you’re busy, but I still see you posting and helping where possible and amenible. Thank you.
      @Wayne-Workman I know you’re helping where you can as well. (Of course I can’t exactly post everybody because I’ve been busy and honestly not keeping up with the forums as much as I probably should.)

      @everyone Thank you. Thank you for still believing in this project. We’re doing the best with what we have. Please understand in we’re lacking, it’s most likely unintentional. I know I’m just busy.

      posted in Announcements
      Tom ElliottT
      Tom Elliott
    • FOG 1.3.5 and Client 0.11.11 Officially Released

      https://news.fogproject.org/fog-1-3-5-and-client-0-11-11-officially-released/

      posted in Announcements
      Tom ElliottT
      Tom Elliott
    • FOG 1.5.0 RC 11

      https://news.fogproject.org/fog-1-5-0-rc-11/

      posted in Announcements
      Tom ElliottT
      Tom Elliott
    • Ubuntu is FOG's enemy

      TLDR; Rerun the fog installer if you have lost “Database Connectivity” to your fog server, or run the ALTER USER syntax shown below.

      So Ubuntu 16, among others I suppose, enable a “security updates” to be applied automatically as a “default” to things. Why, well it makes it simpler to ensure your Ubuntu systems are in compliance and patched for any potential exploits. This causes unknown and unexpected issues.

      I figured it’d be a safe thing to express that there could be problems (as many of you have already experienced) that when these updates go up (with or without your knowledge) it can break functionality in unexpected and inopportune ways.

      The quickest fix is to simply rerun the fog installer which should correct the problem.

      As a note, it seems this problem is specific only when the mysql account is the 'root' user AND the password is blank.

      The “fix” if you must do it manually is to open a terminal and obtain root:
      Super (Windows Key) + T then sudo -i (in most cases).

      From there, open mysql with mysql -u root

      NOTE: MySQL MUST be run with ROOT.

      Run:

      ALTER USER 'root'@'127.0.0.1' IDENTIFIED WITH mysql_native_password BY ''; AND
      ALTER USER 'root'@'localhost' IDENTIFIED WITH mysql_native_password BY '';

      It’s okay if one of them fails. This is going to fix Most people’s issues.

      I would highly recommend removing the unattended-upgrades as many of these “sudden” issues came as a security patch ubuntu pushed out. By default Ubuntu typically set’s this for you as enabled and it can cause havoc on you as you (the admin) may not have “done” anything.

      To prevent this problem from happening in the future you could run:

      apt-get -y remove unattended-upgrades (AS Root again).

      posted in Announcements
      Tom ElliottT
      Tom Elliott
    • FOG Activity - Status

      FOG is still actively being developed. It’s not necessarily readily apparent, but we can assure you things are still being worked on. These updates may not be communicated in a way that everybody just knows, but can easily be seen if one were to look at our repository site.

      Between our own schedules and lives, we can get very busy. We try to keep things updated and help out on the forums even during lull periods. This might mean we aren’t pushing an RC or release as frequently. It may mean we’re working on other things for the project, such as can be seen if looking at our github site.

      Our forums are heavily active, and this should point as an indicator to our “status” as well.

      If anybody would like to see an increase in developers donating their time to making this free software, consider donating either with monetary support or by spending personal time to help with development.

      FOG is an open source project - it’s even in the name. It is driven by people donating their time and resources. The releases of FOG revolve around when developers can spare a few hours throughout the week. Sometimes that will mean releases will be further, sometimes that will mean releases will be faster. That’s just the nature of our project, and many other open source projects.

      posted in Announcements
      Tom ElliottT
      Tom Elliott
    • I'm away, but back?

      Hey everybody,

      I know you see me here on occasion from time to time. Life decisions have made it more difficult for me to do things I would normally be doing. Rest assured, I am still around, and while I’m not quite as active as I was in the past, it’s not because I don’t want to be.

      I had to move, and as part of that I have none of my normal development stuff readily available. Part of the move made me not have a laptop, until today.

      I need to setup my dev environment again, so it may take a little bit, but I will be back up.

      posted in Announcements
      Tom ElliottT
      Tom Elliott
    • RE: Release plan for FOG

      That’s correct. The main reason fog is constantly moving forward is because the codebase is improved upon. Major bugs tend to be addressed for the next release. We don’t do an LTS because there’s really two main people working on fog in a consistent manor. Those two are @Joe-Schmitt and myself. Debian and Libreoffice have the team too be able to perform such a feat. Their product is Opensource but they have an employment team which can afford them that luxury. FOG has a team but we make no money and as such are required to work full time jobs. We work on FOG in our free time. I’ve had the ability to even work on it from work because we used the software.

      Maintaining many different versions is difficult. And we don’t have a support team. WYSIWYG and I think we’ve done pretty well on support, even if we don’t have the ability to do dedicated support for our product. 1.5 was a major step toward modernizing the GUI. 1.6 will vastly improve on this. It was only recently we kind of came up with a road map on how best to proceed. Of note, 1.5 will be maintained until 1.6 is released. 1.6 is focused on making he GUI much more modern. 1.7 will be focused mostly toward fixing and refactoring the FOG client. 1.8 will focus on making the FOS system more modular and usable. I don’t know yet for 1.9. 2.0 will bridge the gap for our rewrite based on the work from 1.5 and up. While we do plan to try to do backports where possible, it’s much easier to ask people to update to the latest version than it is to try to maintain many different versions with backports in mind. At least for what FOG does.

      I doubt this will appease anybody, but it’s what I think needs to be said. We are working hard and provide support for our product as best we can. The community makes fogs support system, I think, one of the best around. Add to that and you can almost always have a developer working side by side to help and fix issues as they come up, I don’t think it’s unfair to ask users to update to a specific version. Even if there are bugs, we will always try to correct what we can, when we can. (And normally it’s a pretty quick turn around).

      I’m not perfect and I’ll give you that. We don’t even have a test suite to know if things are working as intended. We have to rely on the community and suggestions are great, just understand our answers won’t always be what people want to hear.

      posted in Feature Request
      Tom ElliottT
      Tom Elliott
    • FOG 1.4.0 Officially Released

      https://news.fogproject.org/fog-1-4-0-officially-released/

      posted in Announcements
      Tom ElliottT
      Tom Elliott
    • FOG 1.4.4 Officially Released

      https://news.fogproject.org/fog-1-4-4-officially-released/

      posted in Announcements
      Tom ElliottT
      Tom Elliott
    • FOG 1.5.0 RC 12 and FOG Client v0.11.13 Released

      https://news.fogproject.org/fog-1-5-0-rc-12/

      posted in Announcements
      Tom ElliottT
      Tom Elliott

    Latest posts made by Tom Elliott

    • RE: Change FOG Settings in working-1.6 not working

      @AlexisPHC Sorry, foujnd the issue and a fix is pushed.

      In trying to allow for searching the value as part of things I inadvertently removed the “inputValue” field which is what is supposed to be what you can edit. I re-added that and left the ability to search based on the value information.

      This should be fixed in the latest version. (You may still need to do a hard refresh as suggested, but should be able to edit the fields at least now.)

      Thank you!

      posted in Bug Reports
      Tom ElliottT
      Tom Elliott
    • RE: Change FOG Settings in working-1.6 not working

      @AlexisPHC Can you please attempt a Hard refresh (CTRL + SHIFT + R in chrome) on your browser:

      The “groups” are there (that’s what you see for the “BOLD” (FOG Boot Settings)

      They are grouped still. The big difference is things are properly paginated which is a change to how things were done in the past.

      posted in Bug Reports
      Tom ElliottT
      Tom Elliott
    • RE: refind.conf issue after upgrade to working-1.6

      @AlexisPHC The branches are separate from things so if someone removed it in dev-branch/stable/master and I didn’t know about it for working-1.6 it wouldn’t have been removed there.

      I just updated to account for this that should help you out.

      posted in Bug Reports
      Tom ElliottT
      Tom Elliott
    • RE: Use serial number as hostname in Fog

      @AlexisPHC I’m apologizing, yes SYSSERIAL is existing (in working-1.6).

      If you’re willing (and slightly daring) you could update to the working-1.6 branch (give us another tester of it) and SYSSERIAL is re-introduced overthere.

      I am workign with 2 different systems and often look in the primary place I’m working to find information. I can assure you the SYSSERIAL lookup/adjustment is in the working-1.6 branch (and that just happened to be where I was when I looked this up so again my apologies)

      posted in FOG Problems
      Tom ElliottT
      Tom Elliott
    • RE: Use serial number as hostname in Fog

      @AlexisPHC You can set this by putting the name field of quick registration as {SYSSERIAL}

      posted in FOG Problems
      Tom ElliottT
      Tom Elliott
    • RE: Multicast De-Sync When Resizing Disks

      @christop Roger, sorry I’ve been doing a lot of programming in python lately and introduced “int(…)” which isn’t valid PHP syntax. This is corrected in the latest, please pull/install and let me know if it helps?

      Thank you for letting me know.

      posted in FOG Problems
      Tom ElliottT
      Tom Elliott
    • RE: Interface logout gives timeout

      @AUTH-IT-Center Sorry I hadn’t seen this, glad this is fixed now.

      posted in FOG Problems
      Tom ElliottT
      Tom Elliott
    • RE: Minor issue with logging out of FOG web UI: HTTP ERROR 500

      @Fog_Newb This should be fixed in the latest dev-branch please let me know if it’s not.

      Thank you!

      posted in FOG Problems
      Tom ElliottT
      Tom Elliott
    • RE: Multicast De-Sync When Resizing Disks

      @christop Also, another output for informatoin would be:

      sudo systemctl -l status FOGMulticastManager.servcie
      
      posted in FOG Problems
      Tom ElliottT
      Tom Elliott
    • RE: Avoid running tasks when in audit mode

      Now I’m not saying this isn’t a feature that will (or will not) be added. I am not a C# programmer and wouldn’t really know how to start doing this.

      That said, even if we did add this feature, you’d still need to disable the service for sysprep so that when the machine does boot you don’t have an issue.

      Since you have to disable the service anyway, I’m not sure it’s worth the effort to put in a “stop” feature into the client.

      Could even OOBE sysprep load/startup mode potentially be detected? Possibly, but why would we put that much into the FOG Client when it’s just as easy to disable to service when doing configuration stuff such as you’re doing?

      posted in Feature Request
      Tom ElliottT
      Tom Elliott