@Matthieu-Jacquart There’s a new version

@Wayne-Workman Yeah, I figured, I kind of derped there to be honest.

@jkepple2003 Ubuntu 16.04 has specific installation instructions because it doesn’t have php5 packages, only php7. Please refer to the wiki entry for proper install.

@Darrell-Lanson How are you installing Windows 7 to a GPT disk?

You can clean install Windows 10 and enter the Windows 8 key for upgrade.

@kirkk There’s most likely leftover files which you need to manually remove.

I think on Ubuntu you’ll have to remove all php folders in /etc/apache2

You might be interested in post download scripts for this. Will accomplish basically the same thing, but in a more universal manner.

@lawrence1997 said in 1.2.0 to 1.3.0 Failed!! libapache2-mod-php5 Failed!:

Can you run the following command

sudo dpkg --get-selections | grep hold

Then run

sudo apt-get remove packagename

Where packagename is the name of the package that has install after it (if any)

@echo off

rem The fileserver IP
set FILESERVER=192.168.1.155

rem Share on the fileserver.
set SHARE=INSTALLERS\ISOFILES\0-WINPE

rem Username for the share
set SHAREUSER=root

rem Password for the share
set SHAREPASS=root

rem amd64 or x86
set ARCH=amd64

rem Path to hold working files. Needs about 500MB of free space.
set PEPATH="c:\winpe_%ARCH%"

rem ##########################################################
rem     Don't edit anything below here
rem ##########################################################
 
echo Creating the PE image
call copype.cmd %ARCH% %PEPATH% > NUL
 
echo Mounting the image
dism /Mount-Wim /WimFile:%PEPATH%\media\sources\boot.wim /index:1 /MountDir:%PEPATH%\mount /quiet
 
echo Adding commands to the startup script in PE
echo. >> %PEPATH%\mount\windows\system32\startnet.cmd
echo ping %FILESERVER% >> %PEPATH%\mount\windows\system32\startnet.cmd
echo net use z: \\%FILESERVER%\%SHARE% %SHAREPASS% /u:%FILESERVER%\%SHAREUSER% >> %PEPATH%\mount\windows\system32\startnet.cmd
echo z: >> %PEPATH%\mount\windows\system32\startnet.cmd
echo z:\64.bat >> %PEPATH%\mount\windows\system32\startnet.cmd
 
echo Creating the pxeboot directory
mkdir %PEPATH%\pxeboot > NUL
mkdir %PEPATH%\pxeboot\Fonts > NUL
copy /y %PEPATH%\mount\windows\boot\Fonts\*.* %PEPATH%\pxeboot\Fonts\ > NUL
copy /y "%WinPERoot%\%ARCH%\Media\Boot\boot.sdi" %PEPATH%\pxeboot\ > NUL
copy /y "%WinPERoot%\%ARCH%\Media\Boot\BCD" %PEPATH%\pxeboot\ > NUL
 
echo Unmounting the image
dism /unmount-Wim /MountDir:%PEPATH%\mount /Commit /quiet
 
echo Optimizing the image
imagex /EXPORT %PEPATH%\media\sources\boot.wim 1 %PEPATH%\pxeboot\boot.wim > NUL
 
 
echo.
echo All the files you need for your PXE server are in: %PEPATH%\pxeboot\

I use that batch file to easily create WinPE media for different Windows versions. It does require the imaging tools of the Windows Kits though, but I’m guessing most people will have that installed already.

You can add and remove certain commands as needed of course, for eg adding drivers using dism and such.

Any news on this…?

I’d just like to mention that if you clean install the latest W10 iso, this shouldn’t happen (unless you incorrectly remove certain apps)

http://blog.christosoft.de/2012/05/mount-clonezilla-image-to-restore-single-file-browse/

Might work.

You can try to do ./installfog.sh -y which should upgrade it automatically for you without accessing the webgui

@Wayne-Workman The advanced menu is empty by default I believe?

@shird Should be fixed if you update again.

I think this is related to this issue as well, when you choose Quick image it will say there are no images on the server.

All these issues trigger the same “Invalid mac address” bug in wakeonlan.class.php it seems

I think it might be a problem with isset as it always shows up explaining how to use it (indicating it’s not properly set?)

@Bob-Henderson The way I understand it it’s used to prep images regardless of whether or not you use sysprep. As such, it’s not a replacement for your current method, just a way to help you prepare for it.

I have something similar to this, although much more simple and extremely specific to my environment.

@Wayne-Workman The problem is, what arguments can we use to differentiate? It sounds like they’re basically identical NICs connecting to different network outlets, probably getting inconsistent names as well. (based on his results)

https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt

Scroll down to grcan.enable0

Looks like those options are useful?

@tag Are you using quick image?

Might be possible to tell it to use the faster NIC by registering them, assigning the faster NIC as primary NIC and deploying in that manner, but I really can’t be certain on that, I was kind of hoping someone else would chime on in on this, heh.