I have a freshly installed Centos 6.7 server running lastest svn 5307. Running client 0.9.6 on win 7 I get an error in the client log telling PrinterManager ERROR: Response was not encrypted. There is no other errors in the log file.
What I try to do is push a printer and remove other printers on the client.
I have the exact same trouble. Now I have no access to my FOG-system. My own fault as the svn is not stable, I know. Any idea how to fix this? I will try the mentioned stuff tomorrow.
I’m trying to upgrade from svn 3427 to latest of today. When I run the install script I get an error telling:
./installfog.sh
…/lib/common/functions.sh: line 305: syntax error in conditional expression: unexpected token (' ../lib/common/functions.sh: line 305: syntax error near +(’
…/lib/common/functions.sh: line 305: if [[ "$linuxReleaseName" == +(*[Ff]'edora'*) ]]; then' ../lib/common/config.sh: line 62: syntax error in conditional expression: unexpected token(’
…/lib/common/config.sh: line 62: syntax error near +(*' ../lib/common/config.sh: line 62: if [[ “$linuxReleaseName” == +(‘Ubuntu’|‘Debian’) ]]; then’
./installfog.sh: line 45: syntax error in conditional expression: unexpected token (' ./installfog.sh: line 45: syntax error near +(’
./installfog.sh: line 45: ` if [[ “$linuxReleaseName” == +([Dd]‘ebian’|‘buntu’) ]]; then’
I’m running Centos 5.11 and php 5.6.8
@ch3i I think I have discovered the issue. The add to group is missing from Host Management when FOG settings are set to LIST as default. My not-working setting is LIST 12 and then the group options are missing. When I changed setting to SEARCH the options appeared.
@Wayne-Workman The problem is there is no such option when searching for hosts, only when listing all hosts.
Tom: Yes, but where? There is no such options in bottom of the search list in Host management. If my memory is correct this function used to be there? In rev 3377 it has disappeared, even after an empty cache in browser.
[quote=“Tom Elliott, post: 47256, member: 7271”]It should be there. I had a power outage last night so I can’t confirm. Basically the selection isn’t done from a aelect tag any more but the basic idea should work similarly. Host management -> group membership -> checkbox for hosts not in this group -> check the boxes for that area of which hosts you want to be in that group and click add hosts.[/quote]
Hm, it is not found in Host Management. No such options as I think was there in earlier versions. You mean the only option is to put hosts into groups from Membership menu in Groups? This is very little user friendly as I have to find each single host in the list in stead of having the possibility to search for patterns as possible in Host Management. Very time consuming when searhing for a couple of hosts among several hundreds.
Running rev 3377 on CentOs I cannot find where to add hosts to a group. Have I forgotten something? I thought it should be possible to put selected hosts into existing or new group from Host Management. There is no option to do this below the list of hosts.
Then I tried to do this from membership under Groups. All hosts are shown and I can choose which ones to include into the group. This is not a good solution if there are hundreds of hosts. A search/filter function would be nice.
Have a overlooked something?
[quote=“Tom Elliott, post: 47184, member: 7271”]I don’t think it has anything to do with the client.
pmonstad, try clearing your cache.
I run CentOS as my “testing” system and am not seeing the same issue.[/quote]
You are right, Tom. Clearing the cache solved the problem.
Rev 3377 on Centos: When I edit a Host, the menues at the left is not responding. Nothing happens at all when I select e.g. Printers, Snapins etc.
Is the printer management working with the new client on Win 7 hosts?
I am upgrading to SVN 2974 (old SVN is a week or two old). When upgrading the database scheme in GUI I got this error:
Install / Update Failed!
[SIZE=5][B]The following errors occured[/B][/SIZE]
[B]Update ID:[/B] 1 - 0
[B]Database Error:[/B]
mysqlnd cannot connect to MySQL 4.1+ using the old insecure authentication. Please use an administration tool to reset your password with the command SET PASSWORD = PASSWORD(‘your_existing_password’). This will store a new, and more secure, hash value in mysql.user. If this user is used in other scripts executed by PHP 5.2 or earlier you might need to remove the old-passwords flag from your my.cnf file, Message: Check that database is running
[B]Database SQL:[/B]
CREATE DATABASE fog
[B]Update ID:[/B] 1 - 1
[B]Database Error:[/B]
mysqlnd cannot connect to MySQL 4.1+ using the old insecure authentication. Please use an administration tool to reset your password with the command SET PASSWORD = PASSWORD(‘your_existing_password’). This will store a new, and more secure, hash value in mysql.user. If this user is used in other scripts executed by PHP 5.2 or earlier you might need to remove the old-passwords flag from your my.cnf file, Message: Check that database is running
[B]Database SQL:[/B]
CREATE TABLE fog.groupMembers (
gmID int(11) NOT NULL auto_increment,
gmHostID int(11) NOT NULL,
gmGroupID int(11) NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (gmID),
KEY new_index (gmHostID),
KEY new_index1 (gmGroupID)
) ENGINE=MyISAM AUTO_INCREMENT=1 DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1 ROW_FORMAT=DYNAMIC
The error list is very long and I have only pasted the first paragraphs.
How can I fix this?
Use Webin ([url=“http://www.webmin.com”]www.webmin.com[/url], free of charge) and you can easily set up both cron jobs and automatic database backups, and a lot more as well. The best server admin software there is!
[quote=“Joseph Hales, post: 41379, member: 18131”]I remember in the lead up to the 1.1.0 release their was discussion of a more granular user rights setup and was wondering if this was any closer to becoming a reality. My main concern is almost every interface page has a delete all button now and it has me on edge just waiting for one of my lower level users to send me an email titled “Sorry I Deleted all the clients!” or something similar. Really the most common restriction I can think off would be a user limited to registering hosts, adding snapins, and deploying images. This would keep the more inept users out of uploading and deleting anything. Even mobile only access would work if they could add snapins to a host.[/quote]
A tip is to export the hosts. If a user delete hosts by accident you can easily import them again. I have not tested this myself but is should work, I hope 
[quote=“Tom Elliott, post: 40785, member: 7271”]SVN 2895 released.
All the pages should have the multi-deletion capabilities all ready to go. This includes from edit pages of the relevant items too. Hopefully you’ll all enjoy.[/quote]
And it says “Delete all selected hosts” even in Printer Management and Group management.
[quote=“Tom Elliott, post: 40785, member: 7271”]SVN 2895 released.
All the pages should have the multi-deletion capabilities all ready to go. This includes from edit pages of the relevant items too. Hopefully you’ll all enjoy.[/quote]
There is a problem as the first time I do a search the delete and group options are not present in the bottom of the host list. I have to hit the link New search to get these options available.
[quote=“Tom Elliott, post: 39751, member: 7271”]ftp doesn’t in your case.
have you tried logging via ftp to the system (directly) to see if there’s an error being reported during connection?[/quote]
I can do some testing if I can have some help what to do, like a small step-by-step guide.
I still have this problem. Running a 14 days old SVN (-+ 1 week) on Centos where images are put in the home folder. problem have been there since I moved images, and all settings seems to be OK.
[quote=“pmonstad, post: 39225, member: 17422”]Strange. I have a very simple setup for cloning here. A brand new server and a Cisco GB switch connected directly to my office. No other cables etc. Not a big deal really, just wandered if the graph was as expected or if there was some kind of a bug.[/quote]
I can add that the graph looks much better and more correct when I do a deploy. My random “peak graph” was during an upload.
Strange. I have a very simple setup for cloning here. A brand new server and a Cisco GB switch connected directly to my office. No other cables etc. Not a big deal really, just wandered if the graph was as expected or if there was some kind of a bug.
It is set correct here too.