Posts made by plegrand

@Tom-Elliott i’m testing the ps script, but i cant understand why it could works better than a batch script which make the same thing

@Avaryan then i use your ps script as a powershell template into snapin ?
thanks i try

@Avaryan As you can see , i need to mount the share and execute a command which is inside this share…
Then i thin it’s not possible ?

@Tom-Elliott Here is what i need to do and which doesn’ works :

net use * /delete /y >> %tmp%\Update_Windows7.log 2>&1
net use z: \\samba\wsus$ "my'password" /user:samba\administrateur >> %tmp%\Update_Windows7.log 2>&1
z:\wsusoffline\client\UpdateInstaller.exe >> %tmp%\Update_Windows7.log 2>&1
net use /delete * /y >> %tmp%\Update_Windows7.log 2>&1

UpdateInstaller.exe isn’t launched

@Tom-Elliott OK i understand
Then no solution ?

@Avaryan it’s for use WsusOffline which is installed on a samba share \samba\wsus
then i need to mount the wsus share , launch a command (wsus command) dnd then umount share.

@Tom-Elliott the user who established the mount => You means system user ?

@Tom-Elliott I understand that is System User who mounted the point but i’m loged as administrator. It’s not enough to use the share ?
I don’t use GPO’s.
Have you got an idea on how mount a share via snapin ?

@Avaryan I think it will be the same with power shell

thanks for your help

Running Version 1.3.5
SVN Revision: 6067
Client 0.11.11
Debian stable

Hello,

here is a piece of code which doesn’t works from snapin :

net use * /delete /y >> %tmp%\Update_Windows7.log 2>&1
call net use z: \\samba\wsus$ "my'password" /user:samba\administrateur >> %tmp%\Update_Windows7.log 2>&1

(note the " ’ " into the password)

This code works fine from the command line, but from snapin, the drive is displayed with a red cross as it was disconnected, and when i click on it, it says that the name or password is wrong. As i said before this code works fine from command line.

An idea for this problem ?
Thanks for your help

It seams that the problem is because the script is launched as system user.
Is there a solution to solve that ?

@Tom-Elliott
No, same “problem”

@Tom-Elliott said in Wrong Image size in web interface:

systemctl -l status FOGImageSize

systemctl -l status FOGImageSize

● FOGImageSize.service - FOGImageSize
   Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/FOGImageSize.service; enabled)
   Active: active (running) since ven. 2017-05-12 14:32:36 CEST; 5min ago
 Main PID: 12288 (FOGImageSize)
   CGroup: /system.slice/FOGImageSize.service
           ├─12288 /usr/bin/php -q /opt/fog/service/FOGImageSize/FOGImageSize &
           └─12289 /usr/bin/php -q /opt/fog/service/FOGImageSize/FOGImageSize &

mai 12 14:32:36 Fog systemd[1]: Started FOGImageSize.
mai 12 14:32:38 Fog FOGImageSize[12288]: du: impossible d'accéder à « /home/images/PORTGLT650G2 »: Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type

The last error is normal there is no directory PORTGLT650G2, i have to remove image in web interface

@Tom-Elliott
For the moment i prefer to keep the latest stable version.
There is no errors into fogimagesize.log.

@Tom-Elliott
i restarted FOGImage service which is present in 1.3.5 without success

But as you said :
“this element has no impact on the functionality/usability of the images in question.”

No problem for me

Hello Tom,
this the size on client, but the size on server

FOG Configuration => Fog Settings => General Settings => FOG_FTP_IMAGE_SIZE (on)

is wrong also

Then, what is the meanings of these informations ?

Running Version 1.3.5
SVN Revision: 6067
Client 0.11.11
Debian stable

Hello, i’ve got a problem when i look into image management on the web interface.
I cant understand the difference between the informations on the web interface and the image size on the server.

Here is what i can see on the interface :

IUT-206 - 32
default: Windows 7
Single Disk - Resizable
Everything 4.03 MiB Partclone Compressed 2016-07-05 08:51:33

IUT-206-Prof - 36
default: Windows 7
Single Disk - Resizable
Everything 4.04 MiB Partclone Compressed 2016-07-04 17:09:35

IUT-221-Prof - 37
default: Windows 7
Single Disk - Resizable
Everything 6.25 MiB Partclone Compressed 2016-07-04 15:19:22

And on the server itself :

ls -alh IUT206
total 7,0G
drwxrwxrwx  2 fog root 4,0K juil.  5  2016 .
drwxrwxrwx 33 fog root 4,0K mai    2 14:40 ..
-rwxrwxrwx  1 fog root    2 juil.  5  2016 d1.fixed_size_partitions
-rwxrwxrwx  1 fog root 1,0M juil.  5  2016 d1.mbr
-rwxrwxrwx  1 fog root  190 juil.  5  2016 d1.minimum.partitions
-rwxrwxrwx  1 fog root   15 juil.  5  2016 d1.original.fstypes
-rwxrwxrwx  1 fog root    0 juil.  5  2016 d1.original.swapuuids
-rwxrwxrwx  1 fog root 8,2M juil.  5  2016 d1p1.img
-rwxrwxrwx  1 fog root 7,0G juil.  5  2016 d1p2.img
-rwxrwxrwx  1 fog root  190 juil.  5  2016 d1.partitions

ls -alh IUT206Prof
total 7,0G
drwxrwxrwx  2 fog root 4,0K juil.  4  2016 .
drwxrwxrwx 33 fog root 4,0K mai    2 14:40 ..
-rwxrwxrwx  1 fog root    2 juil.  4  2016 d1.fixed_size_partitions
-rwxrwxrwx  1 fog root 1,0M juil.  4  2016 d1.mbr
-rwxrwxrwx  1 fog root  190 juil.  4  2016 d1.minimum.partitions
-rwxrwxrwx  1 fog root   15 juil.  4  2016 d1.original.fstypes
-rwxrwxrwx  1 fog root    0 juil.  4  2016 d1.original.swapuuids
-rwxrwxrwx  1 fog root 8,2M juil.  4  2016 d1p1.img
-rwxrwxrwx  1 fog root 7,0G juil.  4  2016 d1p2.img
-rwxrwxrwx  1 fog root  190 juil.  4  2016 d1.partitions

ls -alh IUT221Prof
total 11G
drwxrwxrwx  2 fog root 4,0K juil.  4  2016 .
drwxrwxrwx 33 fog root 4,0K mai    2 14:40 ..
-rwxrwxrwx  1 fog root    2 juil.  4  2016 d1.fixed_size_partitions
-rwxrwxrwx  1 fog root 1,0M juil.  4  2016 d1.mbr
-rwxrwxrwx  1 fog root  190 juil.  4  2016 d1.minimum.partitions
-rwxrwxrwx  1 fog root   15 juil.  4  2016 d1.original.fstypes
-rwxrwxrwx  1 fog root    0 juil.  4  2016 d1.original.swapuuids
-rwxrwxrwx  1 fog root 8,4M juil.  4  2016 d1p1.img
-rwxrwxrwx  1 fog root  11G juil.  4  2016 d1p2.img
-rwxrwxrwx  1 fog root  190 juil.  4  2016 d1.partitions

What could be the problem ?
Thanks for your help

@Jaymes-Driver
It’s already the best !!!

@Jaymes-Driver
Yes everything works fine, it’s just as you said a very minor issue.
It was for information only.
Thanks for your help

@Jaymes-Driver
Yes

@Jaymes-Driver
Just for information, may be i should start an other thread but when i launch a deploy task for a group I’ve got this message :

Note “Array”
Is it normal ?

The problem was the client version. (old version: 0.9.12)
I had to install the new one on each computer (0.11.9), then reboot each computer.
Then “reset encrypted data” on the group
Now it works fine.
I thought that once there was a new version on the server the client updated “alone”.