I was tired and typed UID out of what I thought was memory, I meant to type SID, as in machine Security Identifier.
Look, this is the information that sysprep changes, and to say that it isn’t needed is bologna, if it wasn’t needed it wouldn’t be required…
“Windows operating system installations include many unique elements per installation that need to be “generalized” before capturing and deploying a disk image to multiple computers. Some of these elements include:
Computer name[1]
Security Identifier (SID)
Driver Cache
Sysprep seeks to solve these issues by allowing for the generation of new computer names, unique SIDs, and custom driver cache databases during the Sysprep process.”
I’m not here to argue, just recommend that you sysprep. It has been speculation that the SID affects activation. I can’t confirm or deny this, but I can point you at an example.
This summer we rolled out Windows 7, the reason they never upgraded was because they didn’t want to sysprep and get the image to activate. We do not have a Volume license, we have KMS, and very few MAK keys. After I spent some time playing with 7, deploying, and activating it to the MAK, I realized with some help of this forum, that my imaging method was incorrect and figured out the way to sysprep our image. After my sysprep image was pushed to my test machines I was able to activate my images to my KMS sever, or the MAK license we had. All I can state is SOMETHING that sysprep does, WILL affect your activation. Specifically if you have a WSUS server for windows updates and activation.
That being said, you are correct Mark does state that having more than one SID shouldn’t affect anything
“I realize that the news that it’s okay to have duplicate machine SIDs comes as a surprise to many, especially since changing SIDs on imaged systems has been a fundamental principle of image deployment since Windows NT’s inception. This blog post debunks the myth with facts by first describing the machine SID, explaining how Windows uses SIDs, and then showing that - with one exception - Windows never exposes a machine SID outside its computer, proving that it’s okay to have systems with the same machine SID. [B]Note that Sysprep resets other machine-specific state that, if duplicated, can cause problems for certain applications like Windows Server Update Services (WSUS), so MIcrosoft’s support policy will still require cloned systems to be made unique with Sysprep.[/B]”
So I am sorry in stating that SID affects activation, I was incorrect, but as you can see there are other reasons to sysprep that will affect the outcome of your image.
Also note that in an Active Directory environment, having machines with the same SID would be counter-productive.
Might I ask why you do not want to sysprep?