• Recent
    • Unsolved
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. geardog
    3. Posts
    G
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 15
    • Posts 71
    • Best 6
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Posts made by geardog

    • RE: Boot emtpy VM to PXE for deployment

      It sounds like your VM handler doesn’t know how to boot off PXE. I had to fiddle with VBox some to find the right NIC settings, but I was able to PXE boot VBox eventually. If your physical boxes can do it, FOG would seem to be up and functional.

      posted in Windows Problems
      G
      geardog
    • A couple images won't shrink/resize on capture..

      I’ve captured most of the boxes around the house, but a couple of them don’t appear to resize. FOG tells me I’m capturing 232GB images.

      During capture the bar says it is basically done at 122GB.

      0_1537890794659_0a2b2a68-9932-4e2d-baec-7a8585f81559-image.png

      Image lists show it at 232GB
      0_1537890876137_cb69eed1-d927-4201-99c2-db6a106171fc-image.png

      The folder shows something like 42GB
      0_1537891125542_255a9808-b6b5-46a8-9e47-23b5b086f23e-image.png

      I’ve run cleanup, chkdsk, & defrags. These boxes aren’t encrypted.

      Any tips to get these to behave/report properly?

      posted in Windows Problems
      G
      geardog
    • RE: No configuration methods succeeded (I210 NIC) HP-Z240

      @george1421

      Tried disabling Spanning tree with no effect.

      It turned out to be a bios/UEFI setting “option rom launch policies.” New to me. In my defense, this box’s bios is pretty massive and clumsy to navigate through, but works now!
      I feel stupid, but my issue appears resolved! Thank you very much George. I might not have ever stumbled through those screens again if it weren’t for you.

      As an aside, the MAC address cloning is a little odd as fog find and tries to get an IP on the wrong NIC first, before it gives up and tries the next NIC.

      posted in Hardware Compatibility
      G
      geardog
    • RE: No configuration methods succeeded (I210 NIC) HP-Z240

      @george1421
      I hadn’t considered a MAC mismatch. This box has two NICs (one to control some equipment). They BOTH have the same MAC address… So maybe the box is trying to configure the first NIC that is only connected to a machine. Of course no IP will be given. Should I spoof a MAC for the “internet NIC” and enter taht in the host record? Will this method confuse FOG?

      posted in Hardware Compatibility
      G
      geardog
    • RE: No configuration methods succeeded (I210 NIC) HP-Z240

      Details on this NIC say it supports pre-boot, but also speaks of available option ROMs. I’m not familiar with much of what I find in this document. Clueless here.

      https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/faqs/ethernet-controller-i210-i211-faq.pdf

      I might just swap out the NIC, but I don’t honestly know if it will make a bit of difference.

      posted in Hardware Compatibility
      G
      geardog
    • No configuration methods succeeded (I210 NIC) HP-Z240

      So this is an HP workstation with an I210-T1 NIC I’m trying to image. It is UEFI, and I don’t make it to the FOG boot menu. Instead I get this:
      0_1536940790766_c9c4c532-02c1-4eba-a34c-00c0f386d787-image.png

      I added vendor codes to the DHCP / windows AD setup ages back, and all that is foggy. I can say that other UEFI boxes image ok.
      0_1536942849889_9c3eb6bb-3f78-4ee1-ade2-cabbbf57bcac-image.png
      0_1536943513626_d1958abb-432e-44a8-96fc-78ab62355bfb-image.png

      Any advice on how to get PXE up on this one?
      0_1536941076693_9abacd5d-5100-4cab-a465-ecdb3c3ab228-image.png

      posted in Hardware Compatibility
      G
      geardog
    • RE: Cannot find disk on system, NVMe, RAID mode, Intel RST

      @Sebastian-Roth

      lspci -nn showed the drive to be in raid mode

      using a tutorial on bcdedit via cmd for safemode boot I was able to change the setting without reinstalling windows

      now the machine is imaged

      resolved and thankyou

      coming back to this with a fresh mind and some new info helped

      posted in Hardware Compatibility
      G
      geardog
    • RE: Cannot find disk on system, NVMe, RAID mode, Intel RST

      @george1421
      Back at it. One of the other hats I wear got in the way.

      I’m on FOG 1.5.4 \ kernel 4.18.3

      As requested…
      0_1536785231194_e0b4e504-71b8-4777-9f40-18b451245345-image.png

      Any hope of getting this NVMe to show up?

      also … on pxe boot this comes up … significant?
      0_1536785366652_3a799a7c-c5e2-47bf-9a6f-c48caa158569-image.png

      posted in Hardware Compatibility
      G
      geardog
    • Dell PE1950 gets error "Can’t load firmware file bnx2/bnx2-rv2p-06-6.0.15.fw"

      This error occurs when trying to catalog a PE1950. I find it a little odd, as I have cataloged and deployed to another PE1950. I have, however, upgraded FOG since then. I’m running fog from a PE2950, on ver 1.5.4 and using the latest kernel (images from 4.18.3).

      I found similar topics, but cringe a little at modifying the boot image. Any other thoughts?

      https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/915/where-do-i-place-firmware-so-fog-can-use-it-during-imaging?loggedin=true

      https://github.com/FOGProject/fos/issues/11

      Just drop firmware file in /lib/firmware/ ?

      posted in Linux Problems
      G
      geardog
    • RE: Deploying image, "~empty image might cause issues," but it initially shows as 65GB then 0.0 after deploy

      @sebastian-roth

      I just happen to be harvesting 1TB drives from workstations for server use. The 250GB drives I picked up for $10 each are adequate for the floor computers.

      Thank you for the firm point at cause.

      posted in FOG Problems
      G
      geardog
    • RE: Deploying image, "~empty image might cause issues," but it initially shows as 65GB then 0.0 after deploy

      @george1421
      I had a handful of the target drive model. I used the same drives I attempted to use as a deploy target to start over. I reinstalled windows on one of the handful of 512 sector drive, and managed to capture and deploy flawlessly to the same box (a Dell Inspiron 3650).

      I then started over trying to capture/deploy the OEM drive/install to help debug the issue. I still can’t deploy an image of the OEM successfully. All of this has been on the same box.

      The error came in when capturing a 4k sector drive and deploying it to a 512 sector drive. This failed in the same way repeatably. This scenario is what I’ve documented here in various ways. The last pictures are of the originating 4k 1TB OEM dell install drive, next the error on deploying the capture of that drive (that was listed as a successful capture), and finally a debug deploy showing the resulting partition info on the intended 250GB 512 target drive.

      posted in FOG Problems
      G
      geardog
    • RE: Deploying image, "~empty image might cause issues," but it initially shows as 65GB then 0.0 after deploy

      In case there is desire to sort out what was going on I ran through the attempted capture/deploy of the original disks. Hoping I’m giving the info asked for.

      This is the disk I captured.
      0_1519142607605_5bd44d87-9fb1-4c2d-8115-952035d4b53d-image.png

      This is the error I got deploying was:
      “no image files found that would match the partitions to be restored”

      This is the debug info I got of the target of failed deployment.
      0_1519142480433_8c677775-7317-4b71-8af8-64bf6229c52c-image.png

      posted in FOG Problems
      G
      geardog
    • RE: Deploying image, "~empty image might cause issues," but it initially shows as 65GB then 0.0 after deploy

      Update:
      The box itself clearly hasn’t been the issue. I’ve done a fresh install of Win10. It captured and deployed successfully to the same target drives. The computer handles 4k and 512 drives fine.

      posted in FOG Problems
      G
      geardog
    • RE: Deploying image, "~empty image might cause issues," but it initially shows as 65GB then 0.0 after deploy

      With the hopes of clearing any confusion, I used diskpart to clean the 250GB drive that was mis-sized with the protected GPT partition mess. It was then 238GB unallocated, which I tried to deploy the 65GB image to again, with the same results.

      posted in FOG Problems
      G
      geardog
    • RE: Deploying image, "~empty image might cause issues," but it initially shows as 65GB then 0.0 after deploy

      I’ve not adjusted anything. This machine is how Dell shipped it. It is a box with UEFI. “Windows tried to fix gpt but nearly fails…” doesn’t make much sense to me, as all of this is outside of windows. The only time windows has any play is when it is booting the original working drive, at which point it works fine. I attached the intended target drive (after deployment failure) to a running windows box to see that mis-sized 1TB protected gpt partition business. As I haven’t successfully cloned the drive, I’m not keen on fixpart’ing it. Maybe tomorrow I’ll call it quits, and just install fresh on another drive, leaving this odd issue to experimentation.

      I can boot from fog either uefi or legacy, but native is surely uefi. I get the same squashed image results.

      EDIT: Ah, you’re curious about output of fixparts on the target drive, I suppose. I’ll try it tomorrow.

      posted in FOG Problems
      G
      geardog
    • RE: Deploying image, "~empty image might cause issues," but it initially shows as 65GB then 0.0 after deploy

      @george1421
      You have it correct. Compressed, it adds up to 65GB. It is an OEM layout that probably has a recovery partition, that I’d hope to never deal with really. For “siplicity” I hoped to just grab and go dealing with the extra data.

      @Sebastian-Roth
      That is a good thought! I’ve never run into compatibility issues on this topic. The original is 4k, and the target that got mis-sized is 512.

      Edit:
      0_1519061306816_892c6068-99ce-4bd8-aecd-dc29a37169ed-image.png

      0_1519061434962_e18f05ba-0022-46b5-be2d-1141d9bfa137-image.png

      0_1519061501631_1cfd6c13-966d-4153-8066-e23a6ed2e206-image.png

      posted in FOG Problems
      G
      geardog
    • RE: Deploying image, "~empty image might cause issues," but it initially shows as 65GB then 0.0 after deploy

      As an update to this peculiar behavior, I see that fog has written the target drive for deployment to be a 1TB drive, but it is a 250GB. Connecting the mis-sized drive to a windows box and opening a storage management window, I see that it is GPT protected and it is 1TB (the size of the drive that was captured coincidentally). If I open diskpart, it shows as the expected 232GB. Cleaning the disk with diskpart returns it to expected values in windows’ storage management viewport.

      posted in FOG Problems
      G
      geardog
    • RE: Deploying image, "~empty image might cause issues," but it initially shows as 65GB then 0.0 after deploy

      @george1421

      I took two shots of ls -la results. The first pic is where the image is shown as being 0.0GB in image listings. The second picture is a re-capture to again show 65GB in the image listing. As soon as I try to deploy this 65GB image it fails and goes to 0.0GB.

      0_1519009508572_9b3ecda3-a9d2-4e75-acb5-15ecfdb063cc-image.png

      posted in FOG Problems
      G
      geardog
    • RE: Deploying image, "~empty image might cause issues," but it initially shows as 65GB then 0.0 after deploy

      The bios only shows AHCI. No other option exists.

      0_1518819540487_f929feed-96cc-4757-b7f3-d47b8d669bfd-image.png

      posted in FOG Problems
      G
      geardog
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 3 / 4