[quote=“Almeida, post: 40786, member: 27482”]Ok.
Is it possible to change the name of hosts after the task of deployment and thereafter to join a domain?
Thanks.[/quote]
With the fog client, if you have an host already deploy and you change the hostname and enable active directory (in the configuration of the host) after imaging, the host will reboot automatically to change it hostname and join the domain in the specific organization unit.
Hi,
I think the fog service installed on host can’t register a host in the fog server. You need to register it before in pxe (quick or full)
Regards,
Ch3i.
[quote=“dttom, post: 40731, member: 28128”]I’ve installed FOG 1.2.0 on Ubunut 14.04. The master storage node is on a NAS separated from the server where FOG is installed.
Uploading an image works fine and the images are lying under the /images folder on the NAS. When trying to start a download task fog reports “To setup download task, you must first upload an image”. If I connect to the NAS via ftp I can connect without problems.
In the dashboard the disk information for the storage node states "Failed to connect to " and if i click on it the message appear: “Unable to pull server information!”.
Any ideas why I can’t start a download task?[/quote]
Hi,
For the download, do you have set the image on the new machine ?
For the disk information, if the NAS is not mounted on your ubuntu, you can’t have these informations.
Regards,
Ch3i.
[quote=“Phillip Goble, post: 40727, member: 28105”]I have installed fog but do I have to configure it[/quote]
Hi,
It’s a very poor description of your problem :
There is a Wiki here : [url]http://www.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page[/url]
And some topics “how to install FoG” :
Regards,
Ch3i.
[quote=“sarge_212, post: 40653, member: 28103”]On this subject, I’ve successfully installed FOG on a vm(CentOS 7) and have had some trouble throughout. I used MariaDB for the database and was able to get a registration menu. However, when I go to upload my first image, I get this error:
*Mounting File System…mount: mounting <ip address>/images/dev on /images failed: Operation not supported
Done
*Preparing to send image file to server.
*Checking mounted File System…
#############################################
############################################
Fatal Error: Failed to mount NFS volume
I do have .mntcheck files in each the /images and /images/dev dirs and am trying to use the FOG server as the storage server as well. Any ideas on what to check? I’ve googled and gone through forums but any direction will help greatly![/quote]
Hi,
Did you check the right of each folder ?
Regards,
Ch3i.
[quote=“Jacob Gallant, post: 40567, member: 26524”]
3. I’m an idiot.
[/quote]
Hi,
How you solve this problem ? 
Regards,
Ch3i
[quote=“Jaymes Driver, post: 40594, member: 3582”]LTS would be a fine choice for FOG 
The only issue FOG had with some versions of Ubuntu, was an upstart bug OF UBUNTU, that they really took some time to fix, then bring back, and fix, and bring back again. It’s hard to say what is going to be broken again because Ubuntu isn’t exactly following the Debian mold any more.
I would look into a pure Debian LTS.[/quote]
Hi,
Never test with LTS but i’ll test later
Regards,
Ch3i.
Hi,
I use FoG on a debian headless server without problem
You can PM me on french if you want.
Regards,
Ch3i.
Hi,
I’ll try the iso asap.
Thx for the bug report on GitHub.
Regards,
Ch3i.
Hi,
On the ROM-o-matic website, I can’t set “Build configuration options”, or don’t understand where to put them…
Regards,
Ch3i.
[quote=“ch3i, post: 40313, member: 2513”]I’ll try this : [URL=‘http://boot.ipxe.org/ipxe.iso’]ipxe.iso[/URL] and the quick start here [url]http://ipxe.org/[/url][/quote]
It’s OK, but I dont know if it’s possible to automatically connect on the boot.php url.
I’ll try this : [URL=‘http://boot.ipxe.org/ipxe.iso’]ipxe.iso[/URL] and the quick start here [url]http://ipxe.org/[/url]
[quote=“TonyB.2871, post: 40293, member: 26980”]Just curious as we were able to image fine on 1.2.0 for quite some time up until recently. I know there was a minor network infrastructure change, but nothing that should have affected the Fog server’s functionality. Given I can access it via HTTP, TFTP, etc… and that it worked before, Im slightly confused why we need to upgrade.[/quote]
Hi,
No new hardware ? : switchs, computers, …
Your server is virtual ?
Regards,
Ch3i.
[quote=“TonyB.2871, post: 40279, member: 26980”]Could you explain why this is necessary? What bearing does it have on the PXE issues I am having?[/quote]
Hi,
SVN versions are “stable”, in my case correct lot of problems since 1.2.
Regards,
Ch3i.
[quote=“Thomas Rucker, post: 40196, member: 1970”]So, it’s not the GPT or MBR, but FOG has a limitation, because of how Lenovo loads their machines.
I guess I have to live with the RAW image then, correct.
I have to say, it works very well, but it’s very slow, thank you for your thoughts.[/quote]
If you have 6 primary partitions it’s GPT.
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GUID_Partition_Table[/url]