• Recent
    • Unsolved
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. braindead
    3. Posts
    B
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 4
    • Posts 29
    • Best 0
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Posts made by braindead

    • RE: Download/Upload Performance Issues Since 1.1.2

      Well, bad news: ethtool is showing all interfaces to be at gigabit speeds, and the switch is showing gigabit speeds being negotiated.

      My copies are going as they have before: ~75 MB/sec.

      Also, my numbers were based on one machine imaging. With about 7 machines, it got down to ~1.2 GB/min.

      posted in Linux Problems
      B
      braindead
    • RE: Download/Upload Performance Issues Since 1.1.2

      I’ll check this stuff out when I get back from lunch and get back to you.

      ethtool on the servers was reporting gigabit earlier today (in the terminals), but I’m going to check it out to be sure.

      posted in Linux Problems
      B
      braindead
    • RE: Download/Upload Performance Issues Since 1.1.2

      [quote=“ianabc, post: 31699, member: 24548”]Has your iSCSI performance dropped? or is it just imaging? The second set of numbers you gave look typical of a single interface to me so my first guess would be your interface bonding has come undone during the update.[/quote]

      No iSCSI performance drops. I changed to single interfaces in response to the performance drop, thinking the switch may be getting overworked, but nope, same performance. 😕

      posted in Linux Problems
      B
      braindead
    • Download/Upload Performance Issues Since 1.1.2

      First off, once again, great work. I appreciate all the work that goes into this project.

      Now to get to business.

      I’ve noticed some significant performance issues since I upgraded from 1.0.1 to 1.1.2, and I can’t figure out where it’s coming from.

      Before the update, I was getting 5-7 GB/min for my downloads, and anywhere from 2-4 GB/min uploads. Now, I get ~1.39 GB/min downloads and ~750 MB/min to 1.3 GB/min uploads.

      Information:

      FOG Server-
      Ubuntu 12.04.4 64-bit
      Pentium Dual-Core E5500 2.8 GHz
      4 GB RAM
      Gigabit network connection
      Dedicated iSCSI gigabit connection to a HP Proliant DL385 with 6 15000 RPM drives in LVM running Ubuntu Server 12.04.4 (with dual processor, 9 GB RAM).

      This has been a great setup, but it took a significant hit as of 1.1.2.

      Throughout the setup, the network connection was bonded to two interfaces on each server in round-robin connection, both connected to the same switch, but I opted to try connecting the Proliant directly to the FOG server, but I haven’t seen any performance increase.

      Any suggestions on where else to look? Layer 1 is fine, and layer 2 seems to be working fine also.

      Thanks.

      Edit: Also, I’m doing unicast in all these setups. I haven’t had too great of performance in multicast to justify configuring it, and unicast works well for me.

      posted in Linux Problems
      B
      braindead
    • RE: Problem after update

      [quote=“Pascal Gazaille, post: 31675, member: 21659”]When I try to do the installation, I have the error in the txt file.

      I’ve updated the my information in the /opt/fog/.fogsettings[/quote]

      I had the same errors, but modified the [CODE]snmysqlpass=“”[/CODE] to blank, then reinstalled.

      Did you run the FOG install script after that?

      Also, there’s a point during the install script to update the DB, then you hit enter afterwards. Try that.

      posted in FOG Problems
      B
      braindead
    • RE: Problem after update

      I was able to resolve this problem by following Tom’s suggestion [URL=‘http://fogproject.org/forum/threads/fog-1-1-2-released.10938/’]here[/URL].

      It’s basically edit this setting to be blank:

      [CODE]snmysqlpass=“”[/CODE]

      in /opt/fog/.fogsettings

      Modify that setting, then reinstall the update.

      posted in FOG Problems
      B
      braindead
    • RE: Requests for Wiki Access <--- ASK HERE

      I realize I’m new (although I’ve been using FOG for about a year now), but I’d like to help out a bit with the documentation side of things.

      Can I get an account?

      Thanks.

      posted in General
      B
      braindead
    • RE: Partclone

      [quote=“Tom Elliott, post: 27535, member: 7271”]This thread is fairly old. Almost as old as when I first moved to partclone in the first place. When we released 1.0.0, we defaulted current images as legacy as most people were upgrading from 0.32 to 1.X.X. This means there’s no more need to download, tweak, and reupload. Hope this helps.[/quote]

      I only posted this because I just did a fresh install of 1.0.1 last night and I had that problem with old images that I was using. The screen told me my images weren’t partclone images. I wasn’t aware of any legacy option.

      BTW, thanks for the hard work. 🙂

      posted in Tutorials
      B
      braindead
    • RE: Partclone

      Hey, I finally have something to contribute to this awesome community!

      I wanted to through this out there for those looking for an alternative solution.

      What I did for migrating some images from 0.32 (partimage) to 1.x (partclone) was:
      [LIST=1]
      []Take a fresh drive and rewrite the partition table.
      [
      ]Create partitions identical to the image I was using.
      []I installed partimage in Ubuntu
      [
      ]Ran partimage and pointed each partition file to the respective partitions.
      []Uploaded to fog 1.0
      [
      ]Voila! Done.
      [/LIST]
      I hope that can help someone.

      posted in Tutorials
      B
      braindead
    • 1 / 1