FOG 1.3.0 RC23 Multicast not working - StorageNode

[Duncan]

@ryanxplosion

no luck still failing

[Tom Elliott]

@Duncan Can you show us exactly what you’ve tried?

[Duncan]

@Tom-Elliott

sorry, i think i have it now.

[11-17-16 2:41:47 pm] * No tasks found!
[11-17-16 2:41:37 pm] * No tasks found!
[11-17-16 2:41:27 pm] * No tasks found!
[11-17-16 2:41:17 pm] * No tasks found!
[11-17-16 2:41:07 pm] * No tasks found!
[11-17-16 2:40:57 pm] * No tasks found!
[11-17-16 2:40:57 pm] * Starting service loop
[11-17-16 2:40:57 pm] * Checking for new items every 10 seconds
[11-17-16 2:40:57 pm] * Starting MulticastManager Service
[11-17-16 2:40:57 pm] Interface Ready with IP Address: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[11-17-16 2:40:57 pm] Interface Ready with IP Address: x.x.x.x
[11-17-16 2:40:57 pm] Interface Ready with IP Address: x.x.x.x

#########################################
# GNU GPL Version 3 #
# http://fogproject.org/credits #
# Credits: #
# Free Computer Imaging Solution #
#########################################```

[Tom Elliott]

@Duncan So you’re operational now?

[Duncan]

@Tom-Elliott

Need to test, will let you know - cheers

[Duncan]

@Duncan said in FOG 1.3.0 RC23 Multicast not working - StorageNode:

@Tom-Elliott

Need to test, will let you know - cheers

[11-17-16 2:46:28 pm] | Task (1) Multi-Cast Task is already running with pid: 6042.
[11-17-16 2:46:18 pm] | Task (1) Multi-Cast Task is already running with pid: 6042.
[11-17-16 2:46:08 pm] | Task (1) Multi-Cast Task is already running with pid: 6042.
[11-17-16 2:45:58 pm] | Task (1) Multi-Cast Task is already running with pid: 6042.
[11-17-16 2:45:48 pm] | Task (1) Multi-Cast Task is already running with pid: 6042.
[11-17-16 2:45:38 pm] | Task (1) Multi-Cast Task is already running with pid: 6042.
[11-17-16 2:45:28 pm] | Task (1) Multi-Cast Task is already running with pid: 6042.
[11-17-16 2:45:18 pm] | Task (1) Multi-Cast Task is already running with pid: 6042.
[11-17-16 2:45:08 pm] | Task (1) Multi-Cast Task is already running with pid: 6042.
[11-17-16 2:44:58 pm] | Task (1) Multi-Cast Task is already running with pid: 6042.
[11-17-16 2:44:48 pm] | Task (1) Multi-Cast Task is already running with pid: 6042.
[11-17-16 2:44:38 pm] | Task (1) Multi-Cast Task is already running with pid: 6042.
[11-17-16 2:44:28 pm] | Task (1) Multi-Cast Task has started!
[11-17-16 2:44:28 pm] | Command: cat /images/storage/Windows764bitDomain/d1p1.img | /usr/local/sbin/udp-sender --interface eth0 --min-receivers 2 --max-wait 600 --mcast-data-address 10.1.9.217 --portbase 62054 --full-duplex --ttl 32 --nokbd --nopointopoint;cat /images/storage/Windows764bitDomain/d1p2.img | /usr/local/sbin/udp-sender --interface eth0 --min-receivers 2 --max-wait 10 --mcast-data-address 10.1.9.217 --portbase 62054 --full-duplex --ttl 32 --nokbd --nopointopoint;
[11-17-16 2:44:28 pm] | Task (1) Multi-Cast Task sending on base port: 62054.
[11-17-16 2:44:28 pm] | Task (1) Multi-Cast Task 2 clients found.
[11-17-16 2:44:28 pm] | Task (1) /images/storage/Windows764bitDomain image file found.
[11-17-16 2:44:28 pm] | Task (1) Multi-Cast Task has been cleaned.
[11-17-16 2:44:28 pm] | Task (1) Multi-Cast Task is new

Stuck at Partclone screen now

[jhuebner]

@Duncan Then you need to do the truncate stuff in the database mentioned somewhere else

[Duncan]

@jhuebner

just doing it now, cheers

[Tom Elliott]

Anybody familiar with code, and/or feel like testing:

Please take a look here:

https://github.com/FOGProject/fogproject/commit/5ead9f7a9dfd822aae06bb99de41769b87988ddb

Criticize and/or test the code that I’ve added to see if it help address the issue please?

[Duncan]

@jhuebner said in FOG 1.3.0 RC23 Multicast not working - StorageNode:

@Duncan Then you need to do the truncate stuff in the database mentioned somewhere else

Truncated but still no joy.

Il go and do some fault finding now.

Cheers for all the help so far @Tom-Elliott @jhuebner @ryanxplosion

[Tom Elliott]

@Duncan What did you truncate?

Please try:

TRUNCATE TABLE multicastSessions;
TRUNCATE TABLE multicastSessionsAssoc;
DELETE FROM tasks WHERE taskTypeID='8' AND taskStateID NOT IN ('4','5');

[Duncan]

@Tom-Elliott

first time truncated:

TRUNCATE TABLE multicastSessions;
TRUNCATE TABLE multicastSessionsAssoc;
DELETE FROM tasks WHERE taskTypeID='8';

Didnt make a difference.

Just ran the ones you gave me there, still stuck at partclone screen.
Restarted FOGMulticastManager service and mysql service for good luck too.

[Tom Elliott]

@Duncan said in FOG 1.3.0 RC23 Multicast not working - StorageNode:

Restarted FOGMulticastManager service and mysql service for good luck too.

You recreated teh taskings and restarted the clients?

[Duncan]

@Tom-Elliott said in FOG 1.3.0 RC23 Multicast not working - StorageNode:

Try these steps please:
rm -rf /etc/php* /etc/apache2*
apt-get purge php5* php7* apache2* libapachephp

Edit the /opt/fog/.fogsettings file.
Change out the php_ver to read with php_ver=‘7.1’
Change out the php_verAdds to read with php_verAdds=‘-7.1’
Delete the packages line.
Rerun the installer.

Is it worth doing this on my FOG server also. I only did my master storagenode

[Tom Elliott]

@Duncan
You can do this on the server too… Though I still think the DB needs to be cleaned up first.

[Duncan]

@Tom-Elliott

Your probably right. Iv had this DB from FOG 0.32…

[Wayne Workman]

@Tom-Elliott This line could fail:
https://github.com/FOGProject/fogproject/commit/5ead9f7a9dfd822aae06bb99de41769b87988ddb#diff-4d38e5a470509891be8d02be2ec77126R37

The output should be sent to the installation log, and the echo line below it replaced with:

[[ $? -eq 0 ]] && echo "Done" || echo "Failed"

[Tom Elliott]

@Wayne-Workman The issue is where this is happening in the source, so the data to log to may not be fully ready and available to start logging to.

If this doesn’t work, the installation steps will fail anyway. That’s why I didn’t focus too much the error stat information.

[Wayne Workman]

@Tom-Elliott Ok then, but it would still be good to have “Done” / “Fail” messages I think. That’s simple to do.

[Tom Elliott]

@Wayne-Workman Yep, for now I’m not overly concerned. It will work one way or the other (fail later or we can fail it immediately). Eitherway, there’s at least a potential solution that prompts for user input first anyway.