• Recent
    • Unsolved
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Anyone have a 3.4 kernel to hand?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    General
    7
    38
    13.4k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • A
      astrouga
      last edited by

      I haven’t had a chance to try it on everything inventory yet – my FOG system is in limbo as I have mainly been playing with .33 beta. Though I suspect it will work on everything.

      The KS is supposed to have more drivers, though I haven’t looked at the .config file to see what sort of things are included. Perhaps it will be unnecessary. I read sometime back that the KS kernel might increase device support at the cost of performance though. I’ll have to try some comparisons on different hardware between the core.config and kitchensink.config, just to see if that is true these days.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J
        jmwalton
        last edited by

        This post is deleted!
        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J
          jmwalton
          last edited by

          please post what you come up with.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • falkoF
            falko Moderator
            last edited by

            [URL=‘http://www.filedropper.com/bzimage’]core kernel 3.4.1 [/URL]

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J
              jmwalton
              last edited by

              [quote=“falko, post: 3895, member: 48”][URL=‘http://www.filedropper.com/bzimage’]core kernel 3.4.1 [/URL][/quote]
              what are the changes?
              thanks

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • falkoF
                falko Moderator
                last edited by

                tbh i’m not quite sure lol, I know it has vmware ISCSI support and is just a maintenance release of astrouga’s 3.4 really

                Linux kernel 3.4.1 includes mostly updated drivers, a few ARM, PowerPC, x86, and SPARC fixes, and other small improvements related to wireless networking and SELinux.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • J
                  jmwalton
                  last edited by

                  [quote=“falko, post: 3898, member: 48”]tbh i’m not quite sure lol, I know it has vmware ISCSI support and is just a maintenance release of astrouga’s 3.4 really

                  Linux kernel 3.4.1 includes mostly updated drivers, a few ARM, PowerPC, x86, and SPARC fixes, and other small improvements related to wireless networking and SELinux.[/quote]
                  well, its probably not the right place to ask, but is there a reason when I deploy to a bunch of computers, it seems to have a memory leak and then seems to just loose network connectivity?
                  I hope you can help.
                  again, sorry if its the wrong thread for this stuff.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • falkoF
                    falko Moderator
                    last edited by

                    Are you refering to 3.4, 3.4.1?

                    What’s your set up? What PCs

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • J
                      jmwalton
                      last edited by

                      [quote=“falko, post: 3902, member: 48”]Are you refering to 3.4, 3.4.1?

                      What’s your set up? What PCs[/quote]
                      well, we have a ubuntu 10.04 server. and we have a ubuntu 10.04 storage server with tftp and pxe abilities thanks to the guide on the fog wiki and I included dhcp in that so that we could get it to work on a different network.
                      we are using currently some optiplex 760 and 740 computers and are going to be upgrading to optiplex 790s here soon.
                      thanks

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • falkoF
                        falko Moderator
                        last edited by

                        [quote=“jmwalton, post: 3904, member: 697”]well, we have a ubuntu 10.04 server. and we have a ubuntu 10.04 storage server with tftp and pxe abilities thanks to the guide on the fog wiki and I included dhcp in that so that we could get it to work on a different network.
                        we are using currently some optiplex 760 and 740 computers and are going to be upgrading to optiplex 790s here soon.
                        thanks[/quote]
                        What kernel? And are your Ubuntu machines fully updated?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • J
                          jmwalton
                          last edited by

                          [quote=“falko, post: 3905, member: 48”]What kernel? And are your Ubuntu machines fully updated?[/quote]
                          yes and 3.4.0 the one that was posted earlier on this thread. is that bad?

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • falkoF
                            falko Moderator
                            last edited by

                            If your having issues , try the 3.4.1 or roll back to a kernel that works with them machines.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • J
                              jmwalton
                              last edited by

                              [quote=“falko, post: 3909, member: 48”]If your having issues , try the 3.4.1 or roll back to a kernel that works with them machines.[/quote]
                              well, the thing is, it works just fine, but the server gets slammed and we loose all contact with it, and the ram usage goes through the roof!
                              could the kernel have something to do with it?
                              the fog kernel I mean?
                              thank you again.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • B
                                boon
                                last edited by

                                Will the more ATI drivers be rolled into the Kitchen Sink 3.4.x? I am currently using [URL=‘http://scatteredspace.com/Fog/bzImage.zip’]this kernel[/URL] for any workstation that has an ATI card, otherwise I get the snow screen.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • falkoF
                                  falko Moderator
                                  last edited by

                                  [quote=“boon, post: 3930, member: 833”]Will the more ATI drivers be rolled into the Kitchen Sink 3.4.x? I am currently using [URL=‘http://scatteredspace.com/Fog/bzImage.zip’]this kernel[/URL] for any workstation that has an ATI card, otherwise I get the snow screen.[/quote]
                                  have you tried the 3.4.1 kernel?

                                  what ati card?

                                  what kernel is that?

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • falkoF
                                    falko Moderator
                                    last edited by

                                    [quote=“jmwalton, post: 3910, member: 697”]well, the thing is, it works just fine, but the server gets slammed and we loose all contact with it, and the ram usage goes through the roof!
                                    could the kernel have something to do with it?
                                    the fog kernel I mean?
                                    thank you again.[/quote]

                                    I have never come across this myself, you may be best starting a new thread, maybe more people can chime in with help

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • J
                                      jmwalton
                                      last edited by

                                      [quote=“falko, post: 3933, member: 48”]I have never come across this myself, you may be best starting a new thread, maybe more people can chime in with help[/quote]
                                      well I can report that we rebuilt the server with Debian, and for a while it seemed to do just fine until it stalled out and we had like 8 computers to go. I think I will start a new thread.
                                      I do want to know, what kind of hardware does your fog server have in it? could that be the problem? could we have a server with not enough power in it to do the job?
                                      thanks

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • R
                                        Robin Commander
                                        last edited by

                                        I don’t think you need a powerful server - I’m using an HP Microserver (AMD N36L processor) with 3Gb ram and 2 x 1Tb sata drives in software raid 1 so not exactly a Ferrari… It has no problems imaging 10 machines concurrently and I’ve not seen any memory leak issues. I’m on Ubuntu 10.04 LTS and FOG 0.31 running the 3.4 kernel.

                                        Assumption is the mother of all f***ups !

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • J
                                          jmwalton
                                          last edited by

                                          [quote=“Robin Commander, post: 3961, member: 64”]I don’t think you need a powerful server - I’m using an HP Microserver (AMD N36L processor) with 3Gb ram and 2 x 1Tb sata drives in software raid 1 so not exactly a Ferrari… It has no problems imaging 10 machines concurrently and I’ve not seen any memory leak issues. I’m on Ubuntu 10.04 LTS and FOG 0.31 running the 3.4 kernel.[/quote]
                                          well, I can give you what happens to our server after a while of imageing, I have the syslog output.
                                          here it is below.
                                          note: I took the computername out of the log output.
                                          Jun 6 14:43:31 computername kernel: [ 2020.988408] tg3 0000:0a:01.0: eth0: transmit timed out, resetting
                                          Jun 6 14:43:31 computername kernel: [ 2020.988466] tg3 0000:0a:01.0: eth0: DEBUG: MAC_TX_STATUS[00000008] MAC_RX_STATUS[00000000]
                                          Jun 6 14:43:31 computername kernel: [ 2020.988521] tg3 0000:0a:01.0: eth0: DEBUG: RDMAC_STATUS[00000000] WDMAC_STATUS[00000000]
                                          Jun 6 14:43:31 computername kernel: [ 2021.088778] tg3 0000:0a:01.0: tg3_stop_block timed out, ofs=2c00 enable_bit=2
                                          Jun 6 14:43:31 computername kernel: [ 2021.189610] tg3 0000:0a:01.0: tg3_stop_block timed out, ofs=1800 enable_bit=2
                                          Jun 6 14:43:31 computername kernel: [ 2021.289938] tg3 0000:0a:01.0: tg3_stop_block timed out, ofs=4800 enable_bit=2
                                          Jun 6 14:43:32 computername kernel: [ 2021.464962] tg3 0000:0a:01.0: eth0: Link is down
                                          thank you.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • falkoF
                                            falko Moderator
                                            last edited by

                                            My server hardware

                                            Its just an old Dell T3400 with a terabyte drive, nothing beefy at all, even on 100mb connection to network, will change soon to 1 GB (should see a performance improvement)

                                            Ubuntu Linux 10.04.4
                                            [B]Webmin version[/B] 1.580
                                            [B]Time on system[/B] [URL=‘https://172.26.154.140:10000/time/’]Thu Jun 7 09:06:47 2012[/URL]
                                            [B]Kernel and CPU[/B] Linux 2.6.32-39-server on x86_64
                                            [B]Processor information[/B] Intel® Core™2 Duo CPU E6750 @ 2.66GHz, 2 cores
                                            [B]System uptime[/B] 64 days, 23 hours, 38 minutes
                                            [B]Running processes[/B] [URL=‘https://172.26.154.140:10000/proc/’]129[/URL]
                                            [B]CPU load averages[/B] 0.00 (1 min) 0.01 (5 mins) 0.00 (15 mins)
                                            [B]CPU usage[/B] 0% user, 0% kernel, 2% IO, 97% idle
                                            [B]Real memory[/B] 1.96 GB total, 273.72 MB used

                                            [B]Local disk space[/B] 1.79 TB total, 184.62 GB used

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 2 / 2
                                            • First post
                                              Last post

                                            152

                                            Online

                                            12.0k

                                            Users

                                            17.3k

                                            Topics

                                            155.2k

                                            Posts
                                            Copyright © 2012-2024 FOG Project