FOG Compatibility Test Failed

Sebastian Roth

Sorry! Should be (remove $

            [[ -z $submask ]] && submask=$( cidr2mask $(getCidr $interface))

@george1421 You are absolutely right about people need to get enough sleep!

techlover28

@Sebastian-Roth Thank you for the instant response.

I have edited it and removed the “$” symbol.

It has failed again.

Setting up and starting DHCP Server…Failed!

It seems that “dhcpd.conf” has the “option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;” line in it. When I remove it, I am able to start the DHCPd service.

subnet 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0{
option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;
range dynamic-bootp 192.168.1.253 192.168.1.254;
default-lease-time 21600;
max-lease-time 43200;

Sebastian Roth

I have that option in my config too. Does not cause an issue?! I can’t see what’s wrong with it.

techlover28

@Sebastian-Roth I am not sure why it is causing the issue. When I remove it, DHCP service works, when I keep it, DHCP service does not come up.

May be because we are configuring mask (255.255.255.0) two times?

Sebastian Roth

@techlover28 Please take a look at your syslog while having the option in place and restarting dhcpd. Do tail -f /var/log/messages on one console and restart the service on another. See what error message comes up.

Quazz

@techlover28 That should not cause an issue, but I do note that in my dhcp configs there’s a space between netmask 255.255.255.0 and {

Might be irrelevant, but I’ve yet to see a valid config without that space.

Sebastian Roth

@Quazz Thought about that too, but tested with and without space and it’s fine either way.

techlover28

@Sebastian-Roth Ah! sorry. Behavior has changed from the previous versions. In previous version, it used to say “unrecognized command” or something (not sure about the exact errors) in messages.

But in the current version (6181), install.sh does fail on DHCP but not because of “options” thing. Should be something else. It doesn’t give the same error under messages which it used to in old version.

In fog_error_6181.log, we see this:

Shutting down dhcpd: ESC[60G[ESC[0;32m  OK  ESC[0;39m]
Starting dhcpd: ESC[60G[ESC[0;32m  OK  ESC[0;39m]
status: unrecognized service

In messages, we see this:

Feb  4 15:30:18 Phoenix dhcpd: Not searching LDAP since ldap-server, ldap-port and ldap-base-dn were not specified in the config file
Feb  4 15:30:18 Phoenix dhcpd: Wrote 0 class decls to leases file.
Feb  4 15:30:18 Phoenix dhcpd: Wrote 0 leases to leases file.
Feb  4 15:30:18 Phoenix dhcpd: Listening on LPF/em2/f8:bc:12:3b:48:3d/192.168.1.0/24
Feb  4 15:30:18 Phoenix dhcpd: Sending on   LPF/em2/f8:bc:12:3b:48:3d/192.168.1.0/24
Feb  4 15:30:18 Phoenix dhcpd: 
Feb  4 15:30:18 Phoenix dhcpd: No subnet declaration for em1 (10.201.6.176).
Feb  4 15:30:18 Phoenix dhcpd: ** Ignoring requests on em1.  If this is not what
Feb  4 15:30:18 Phoenix dhcpd:    you want, please write a subnet declaration
Feb  4 15:30:18 Phoenix dhcpd:    in your dhcpd.conf file for the network segment
Feb  4 15:30:18 Phoenix dhcpd:    to which interface em1 is attached. **
Feb  4 15:30:18 Phoenix dhcpd: 
Feb  4 15:30:18 Phoenix dhcpd: Sending on   Socket/fallback/fallback-net
Feb  4 15:35:50 Phoenix dhcpd: Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Server 4.1.1-P1
Feb  4 15:35:50 Phoenix dhcpd: Copyright 2004-2010 Internet Systems Consortium.
Feb  4 15:35:50 Phoenix dhcpd: All rights reserved.
Feb  4 15:35:50 Phoenix dhcpd: For info, please visit https://www.isc.org/software/dhcp/

It appears to be a system specific issue. I should be able to get rid of it soon.

Sebastian Roth

Is this with “option subnet-mask”?? Looks ok from the logs I reckon:

Feb  4 15:30:18 Phoenix dhcpd: Listening on LPF/em2/f8:bc:12:3b:48:3d/192.168.1.0/24
Feb  4 15:30:18 Phoenix dhcpd: Sending on   LPF/em2/f8:bc:12:3b:48:3d/192.168.1.0/24

Quazz

With option subnetmask included, could you run

dhcpd -t -cf /path/to/dhcpd.conf

And post the output here? (or on pastebin if it’s a lot)

Wayne Workman

@techlover28 Can we see your entire dhcpd.conf file please?

Also, dhcp ignoring interface em1 is fine, since you don’t want dhcp served on that network.
But if you want that error to go away, just create a blank declaration for that interface’s network.

techlover28

@Sebastian-Roth @Sebastian-Roth Yes it is with “option subnet-mask”. But install.sh is still failing.

A quick question, do “ldap” errors won’t affect the working of DHCP? I can ignore it then.

@Quazz Please find the output below:

 # dhcpd -t -cf /etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf
Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Server 4.1.1-P1
Copyright 2004-2010 Internet Systems Consortium.
All rights reserved.
For info, please visit https://www.isc.org/software/dhcp/
Not searching LDAP since ldap-server, ldap-port and ldap-base-dn were not specified in the config file

@Wayne-Workman Please find the complete DHCPd.conf below:

# DHCP Server Configuration file\n#see /usr/share/doc/dhcp*/dhcpd.conf.sample
# This file was created by FOG
#Definition of PXE-specific options
# Code 1: Multicast IP Address of bootfile
# Code 2: UDP Port that client should monitor for MTFTP Responses
# Code 3: UDP Port that MTFTP servers are using to listen for MTFTP requests
# Code 4: Number of seconds a client must listen for activity before trying
#         to start a new MTFTP transfer
# Code 5: Number of seconds a client must listen before trying to restart
#         a MTFTP transfer
option space PXE;
option PXE.mtftp-ip code 1 = ip-address;
option PXE.mtftp-cport code 2 = unsigned integer 16;
option PXE.mtftp-sport code 3 = unsigned integer 16;
option PXE.mtftp-tmout code 4 = unsigned integer 8;
option PXE.mtftp-delay code 5 = unsigned integer 8;
option arch code 93 = unsigned integer 16;
use-host-decl-names on;
ddns-update-style interim;
ignore client-updates;
next-server 192.168.1.1;
# Specify subnet of ether device you do NOT want service.
# For systems with two or more ethernet devices.
# subnet 136.165.0.0 netmask 255.255.0.0 {}
subnet 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0{
    option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;
    range dynamic-bootp 192.168.1.253 192.168.1.254;
    default-lease-time 21600;
    max-lease-time 43200;
    class "UEFI-32-1" {
        match if substring(option vendor-class-identifier, 0, 20) = "PXEClient:Arch:00006";
        filename "i386-efi/ipxe.efi";
    }
    class "UEFI-32-2" {
        match if substring(option vendor-class-identifier, 0, 20) = "PXEClient:Arch:00002";
        filename "i386-efi/ipxe.efi";
    }
    class "UEFI-64-1" {
        match if substring(option vendor-class-identifier, 0, 20) = "PXEClient:Arch:00007";
        filename "ipxe.efi";
    }
    class "UEFI-64-2" {
        match if substring(option vendor-class-identifier, 0, 20) = "PXEClient:Arch:00008";
        filename "ipxe.efi";
    }
    class "UEFI-64-3" {
        match if substring(option vendor-class-identifier, 0, 20) = "PXEClient:Arch:00009";
        filename "ipxe.efi";
    }
    class "Legacy" {
        match if substring(option vendor-class-identifier, 0, 20) = "PXEClient:Arch:00000";
        filename "undionly.kkpxe";
    }
}

Wayne Workman

@Tom-Elliott @techlover28

What’s wrong with this line?
range dynamic-bootp 192.168.1.253 192.168.1.254;

I would recommend we add 10 to the network base (in the ConfigureDHCP function) instead of 253.

techlover28

@Wayne-Workman I believe that would be a right thing to do.

FOG Compatibility Test Failed

248

11.7k

17.1k

154.6k