FOG Compatibility Test Failed
-
@Tom-Elliott I have done the “svn up”, below is the output:
# svn up A .gitignore U lib/common/functions.sh . . U packages/web/lib/fog/group.class.php Updated to revision 4752.
But the install.sh script failed again at the same place (Setting up and starting DHCP Server…Failed!).
-
@techlover28 Ok so, you have many interfaces.
What network do you want FOG to serve DHCP to? The 192.168.1.0 network or the 10.201.0.0 network?
-
@Wayne-Workman I am using interface em2 (192.168.1.0) for FOG/DHCP management.
-
@techlover28 So are you specifying the correct interface during the FOG installation? the
em2
interface? -
@Wayne-Workman Yes, I am.
* Here are the settings FOG will use: * Base Linux: Redhat * Detected Linux Distribution: CentOS * Server IP Address: 192.168.1.1 * Interface: em2 * Installation Type: Normal Server * Donate: 0 * Internationalization: 0 * Image Storage Location: /images * Using FOG DHCP: Yes * DHCP router Address: * DHCP DNS Address:
-
I’ve forked the fogproject and added auxiliary code in case the IP or Subnet mask is missing - to hopefully solve your issue.
If you know how to use git, the project is here: https://github.com/wayneworkman/fogproject
Report back with your findings please, if it works we need to merge it to the main repo.
-
@Wayne-Workman I had installed FOG 1.2.0 earlier. It worked fine with DHCP. I observed the issue during upgrade to Trunk (I attempted to upgrade because I was facing issue with the RAID disk and Trunk has RAID drivers included).
If you know how to use git, the project is here: https://github.com/wayneworkman/fogproject
This link appears to be pointing to the download of Fog 1.2.0. Is it the updated version including RAID drivers?
-
@techlover28 It’s not pointing to 1.2.0.
-
@techlover28 Please update and try again, the changes I’ve made have been merged. Maybe it’s fixed now?
-
@Wayne-Workman Sorry I should have downloaded and installed it instead of just looking at the text. I have downloaded it and trying to install it now.
I am getting an error:
Setting up and starting DHCP Server…/lib/common/functions.sh: line 1705: 255.255.255.0: command not found
Failed!I think it should be something to do with GIT.
-
I am trying to make an understanding with GIT and going to try again installing version 6181 after setting GIT up.
-
@techlover28 No I think there is a fix needed that @Wayne-Workman can shoot up pretty soon!
In line 1705 instead of:
[[ -z $submask ]] && $( cidr2mask $(getCidr $interface))
should be (I reckon):
[[ -z $submask ]] && $submask=$( cidr2mask $(getCidr $interface))
You can edit this in your local files and test till you hear from Wayne.
-
@Sebastian-Roth I have edited functions.sh file - replaced 1705 line.
I am facing the same issue again.
Setting up and starting DHCP Server…/lib/common/functions.sh: line 1705: =255.255.255.0: command not found
Failed! -
Sorry! Should be (remove
$
[[ -z $submask ]] && submask=$( cidr2mask $(getCidr $interface))
@george1421 You are absolutely right about people need to get enough sleep!
-
@Sebastian-Roth Thank you for the instant response.
I have edited it and removed the “$” symbol.
It has failed again.
Setting up and starting DHCP Server…Failed!
It seems that “dhcpd.conf” has the “option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;” line in it. When I remove it, I am able to start the DHCPd service.
subnet 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0{ option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0; range dynamic-bootp 192.168.1.253 192.168.1.254; default-lease-time 21600; max-lease-time 43200;
-
I have that option in my config too. Does not cause an issue?! I can’t see what’s wrong with it.
-
@Sebastian-Roth I am not sure why it is causing the issue. When I remove it, DHCP service works, when I keep it, DHCP service does not come up.
May be because we are configuring mask (255.255.255.0) two times?
-
@techlover28 Please take a look at your syslog while having the option in place and restarting dhcpd. Do
tail -f /var/log/messages
on one console and restart the service on another. See what error message comes up. -
@techlover28 That should not cause an issue, but I do note that in my dhcp configs there’s a space between netmask 255.255.255.0 and {
Might be irrelevant, but I’ve yet to see a valid config without that space.
-
@Quazz Thought about that too, but tested with and without space and it’s fine either way.