Support for multiple nics / subnets
-
Great info, we’re using simple netgear switches, I think the problem is I’ve overthought this, I’ve an automated image pulled via a menu selection and have just realised that this has the IP address of fog hard coded, this must be why imaging fails on other subnets.
Thanks for your help, I will do some more testing
-
The “bypass host registration” entry I had with hard coded IPs didn’t work when I copied and changed for the other subnet.
Menu entries appear, but doing any action just causes it to hang, e.g. doing a full host registration, it correctly see’s the hard disk, then says “Starting host registration…” and just stays like that for a long while, then it comes back with the specs, and attempts to send and hangs for longer.
On the default subnet this works as expected and no hangs.
Fog’s default IP is on subnet one, the test machine is on subnet two.
Falko, can you tell me how you initially setup fog, specifically the IP / networking portion when going through the script.
-
I would like to reopen this as I think it’s better than creating new topic (if not, feel free to move it).
As far as I understood from reading this forum, there are 2 ways for FOG supporting multiple subnets:
[LIST=1]
[]1 FOG server and allowing traffic to it from other subnets
[]1 master FOG server and several nodes per subnet
[/LIST]
Suppose I can’t go (I’m not saying that I can’t, but say I can’t) or don’t want to go either of them. So there is this 3rd way - making FOG able to work for multiple nics (virtual or physical). How much work and how hard would it be to accomplish this? I know a bit of php, mysql, shell scripting, so I would help or try to make it myself if it’s not too much of remaking of FOG. I will have maybe 1 or 2 weeks for this. -
I can’t answer that question but for those reading this option one from above is the easiest. Just need a layer 3 switch to do the vlan routeing.
Also to answer Yusuf’s question ( I know it was long ago) I simply gave it all the ip settings of the vlan the server was in. And let the switches do the rest
-
I started to explore FOG’s code and now I think I understand which parts are involved in creating multicast task. So I decided to try it. My idea is to associate groups with interfaces (probably by adding new column to table groups, called say “interface”) and then use existing code - function createMulticastJob used in /var/www/management/includes/tasks.confirm.include.php, which has now (in FOG 0.32) set parameter $eth to “null” (change this that the parameter would be set according to group’s interface). And updating /opt/fog/service/common/lib/MulticastTask.class.php accordingly.
What do you think? Do you see better/easier way? Or do you see any problems doing this? I would like to make it as simple as possible (because of time constraints) and change as little as is needed to have FOG be able to run multiple (ideally simultaneous) multicast tasks. But would like to see opinions/thoughts of anybody who is interested - to make the changes as widely usable as possible. But bear in mind that I’m not as much experienced in php and mysql and have just 1 or 2 weeks.
Does anybody see problems with simultaneous multicast session (sitting on different interfaces and perhaps different ports(?))? Or with any other part (processes) involved?
What about new FOG version (0.33)? Are there any changes in code affecting multicast tasks?
Thanks.
-
So, small progress. I was able to change FOG to create 2 simultaneous multicast tasks with different interfaces and base ports (but didn’t test it yet). I changed FOGMulticastManager to query interface from db (added column groupInterface to groups table and updated my groups with interface) instead of from /opt/fog/service/etc/config.php. And changed /var/www/fog/commons/functions.include.php (added function getGroupsInterface( $conn, $taskName )) and /var/www/fog/management/includes/tasks.confirm.include.php (lines for getting groups interface and adding this interface to function createMulticastJob).
Just wanted to know if my initial idea would work. If somebody is interested, feel free to comment. No time today, will continue next week.
-
rado,
Unless there’s a particular reason, can you test out 0.33b code? I got multicast tasks working. I can create multiple tasks, though I haven’t played too much with interfaces. I imagine, however, with my new understanding, it’s relatively easy to setup. The only issue I foresee is the storage of the “2nd” interface would have to be either group and/or host related. This is because in 0.33, you can create individual multicast jobs to a host. I haven’t, yet, figured out how to kill a previously generated task and recreate a new one (while also changing the task and pxe files) to reflect the new change. The port would still work as the original task would have been used.I believe the issue you were initially running into was because the ports were all the same. It wouldn’t matter, as far as I can tell, if two interfaces were using the same port, which is why you had to create different ports. The same port was causing your issue, not the interface.
I Imagine that you’d only need two interfaces, or more, if you’re trying to separate different segments of the network for testing or some real major need. However, it’d be easier (and you could use the same ports, though it may confuse systems trying to communicate on that/those ports) to setup two separate server rather than trying to make your server perform all the work.
-
Hi Tom, yes, I can. I have no special reason to change 0.32 code, just had it installed and didn’t know how usable is 0.33. So, I try it. I’m not sure with some of your sentences, but maybe I should first take look at the changes and then I ask.
How far are you from proper release of 0.33 (I don’t know the right name, is it beta?, but hope you understand)?Can you pleas tell me which svn link should I use? I found these 3:
[url]https://svn.mastacontrola.com/svn/freeghost[/url]/ but it says it’s revision 1
[url]https://svn.mastacontrola.com/p/freeghost/code/trunk/[/url] says revision 1117
[url]https://svn.code.sf.net/p/freeghost/code/trunk[/url] says 1118 -
svn.mastacontrola.com/svn/freeghost, (That was when I first created my svn server.) (DO NOT USE THIS ONE.)
svn.mastacontrola.com/p/freeghost/code/trunk (Syncs every hour, and I just released r1118, so it may not have synced yet.) You can use it, but I would use:svn.code.sf.net/p/freeghost/code/trunk (DING DING DING DING, Use this one for the most accurate.)
-
So, I have FOG 0.33 running. Now I’m uploading image (because I accidentally deleted previous one). Tomorrow will test multicast - should I test something concrete regarding multicast?
[quote=“Tom Elliott, post: 21567, member: 7271”]The only issue I foresee is [B]the storage[/B] of the “2nd” interface would have to be either group and/or host related. This is because in 0.33, you can create individual multicast jobs to a host. I haven’t, yet, figured out how to kill a previously generated task and recreate a new one (while also changing the task and pxe files) to reflect the new change. The port would still work as the original task would have been used.[/QUOTE]
Are you talking about storage node? Or?
[quote=“Tom Elliott, post: 21567, member: 7271”]
I believe the issue you were initially running into was because the ports were all the same. It wouldn’t matter, as far as I can tell, if two interfaces were using the same port, which is why you had to create different ports. The same port was causing your issue, not the interface.I Imagine that you’d only need two interfaces, or more, if you’re trying to separate different segments of the network for testing or some real major need. However, it’d be easier (and you could use the same ports, though it may confuse systems trying to communicate on that/those ports) to setup two separate server rather than trying to make your server perform all the work.
[/quote]What do you mean by this issue? I don’t have problems with ports, just wanted to get fog running on 2 or more ifaces.
-
Originally mistakenly posted to “Latest FOG 0.33b” topic.
Hi. So I decided not to work on multiinterface patch - because of time and because there is too much change on 0.33 now and haven't time to figure out which code is involved. So I will postpone it for now. If you would have time, Tom (or anybody who has some idea about it), to write down the internals of multicasting in FOG 0.33 - which parts of code are involved (I think it should be enough which classes and scripts (just file names) - I think I would be able to understand the logic when I have an idea where to start from. If not, I will ask :) ), it would be really good - I will look here occasionally. -
The multicast works based on three areas.
The first part: (The actual classes)
MulticastSessions.class.php (Just to create the actual session for use. Multiple or individual system.)
MulticastSessionsManager.class.php (Just the manager for finding/obtaining the sessions.)
MulticastSessionsAssociation.class.php (Used for the host/task relationship, Number of pc’s in tasking are counted through this. Associates the Session with the Tasks and Hosts.)
MulticastSessionsAssociationManager.class.php (Just to help find which tasks are part of a specific session.)
MulticastTask.class.php (Used to actually generate the command, kill the task when complete, update relevant fields as necessary.)
Host.class.php (The function createImagePackage() actually generates the package so hosts can operate as with any other tasking generated, but has separated methods to deal with multicast vs. unicast.)That’s pretty much it. It looks like a lot, but it really isn’t. The main files you’ll need to work with are:
MulticastSessions.class.php (To generate the session based on interface)
MulticastSessionsAssociation.class.php (So you can assign hosts/groups with a specific interface, this links the session with the tasking.)
MulticastTask.class.php (Really just to make sure the interface setting is where you need it.) -
Thanks much Tom. I will look at it when time permits (I suppose in few weeks).
[quote=“Tom Elliott, post: 22323, member: 7271”]The multicast works based on three areas.
The first part: (The actual classes)
[/quote]What’s the second part, is there any? Thanks.
-
Yeah,
The classes are all separated into their own parts.
First Part: (These files handle the sessions generated.)
MulticastSessions.class.php
MulticastSessionsManager.class.phpSecond Part: (These files associate the Task to the Session based on the Image)
MulticastSessionsAssociation.class.php
MulticastSessionsAssociationManager.class.phpThird Part: (These files deal with Task Creation and Command Creation:
Host.class.php (The function createImagePackage generates the taskings.)
MulticastTask.class.php (This file creates the command line and handles the stuff on the server.) -
Ok, thanks.
-
So, finally I’ve time to look at this again. I decided that I at first try to tinker with interface settings. But I can’t find right setting which affects udp-sender’s interface - I tried settings in FOG Configuration (FOG_WOL_INTERFACE, FOG_UDPCAST_INTERFACE, FOG_NFS_ETH_MONITOR), in Storage Management and in /var/www/fog/lib/fog/Config.class.php, and some combinations of these, but nothing works.
What’s the right way to change it? Is there some other setting I missed?
Thanks.
-
the interface for udp-sender is stored in /var/www/fog/lib/fog/Config.class.php under svc_setting method. I believe it’s defined value is:
MULTICASTINTERFACE -
Hi, thanks. I tried this already, but tried it once again and the same result. Then I realized, that maybe it needs /etc/init.d/FOGMulticastManager restart and yes, now the interface is changed
Few questions however - what is that setting - FOG_UDPCAST_INTERFACE - in FOG Configuration for? And why are there 2 configuration places - database and config file? Is it for some legacy reasons, or?
-
I think UDPCAST_INTERFACE is the intentional item to be used for dynamics. I can take a look on the SVN side of the house and get the interface from there.
-
SVN 2004 now uses the FOG_UDPCAST_INTERFACE rather than the defined interface in Config.class.php.
