• Recent
    • Unsolved
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Fog Server Multi-Home

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved
    FOG Problems
    2
    6
    1.9k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J
      josh.nicholson99
      last edited by

      We have a population of machines on different vlans and we would like to have an interface (trunked) on the fog server participate on the different vlans as we did it ghost.

      We are running Ubuntu 14.04 and have added the vlans to the /etc/network/interfaces and used vconfig to add the vlans to the interface.

      What should we do?

      We would like to avoid configuring the routers to pass multicast traffic and would like to keep the routing simple.

      Please advise.
      Thank you.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Wayne WorkmanW
        Wayne Workman
        last edited by

        I’m more than willing to help, but I don’t have vlans to test with. If you explain in detail how you did it with Ghost, maybe we will see how to do it with fog?

        Otherwise, the Location Plugin is designed specifically for this. With the location plugin setup, you disable Image downloading traffic across defined locations. You’d need storage nodes on each vlan though - which isn’t too tough. You can run a fog storage node on an old core 2 duo without much issue.

        Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!
        Daily Clean Installation Results:
        https://fogtesting.fogproject.us/
        FOG Reporting:
        https://fog-external-reporting-results.fogproject.us/

        J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J
          josh.nicholson99
          last edited by

          We tagged multiple vlans on one port on our switch and then had multiple IP’s configured on that interface on our server. Does that make sense?

          In linux what I would do is have multiple vlans bound to a single interface an example is:
          sudo vconfig add eth1 10
          sudo vconfig add eth1 20
          sudo vconfig add eth1 30

          I would then configure IP’s for each of those vlans in the /etc/network/interfaces config file.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • J
            josh.nicholson99 @Wayne Workman
            last edited by

            This post is deleted!
            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J
              josh.nicholson99
              last edited by

              Is there a way to make the tftp and PXE services listen on multiple interfaces/virtual interfaces?

              Wayne WorkmanW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Wayne WorkmanW
                Wayne Workman @josh.nicholson99
                last edited by

                @josh.nicholson99 I should slow you down firstly - do your vlans go over slow and long distance links?

                For example, my organization has every site connected via dedicated lines - but those lines are low speed links. We avoid heavy loads over the WAN links at all costs. EVEN THOUGH we have a vlan infrastructure that can easily bring any network to any port that we wish. If your organization’s setup is similar to this, I’d urge you to use the location plugin and setup storage nodes at each of your physical locations.

                In the case that you have amazing WAN speeds or don’t have WAN links at all, then I’ve found these links that might be of interest:
                https://communities.bmc.com/thread/41369
                http://www.humboldt.co.uk/a-working-tftp-server-for-multi-homed-linux-systems/
                http://www.tecmint.com/install-pxe-network-boot-server-in-centos-7/

                It would seem as if dnsmasq is the answer… I haven’t looked deeply into it yet though.

                Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!
                Daily Clean Installation Results:
                https://fogtesting.fogproject.us/
                FOG Reporting:
                https://fog-external-reporting-results.fogproject.us/

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • 1 / 1
                • First post
                  Last post

                161

                Online

                12.0k

                Users

                17.3k

                Topics

                155.2k

                Posts
                Copyright © 2012-2024 FOG Project