Unable to Deploy Image
-
Tom,
When I noticed I had an issue, I upgraded to the Kernel - 3.14.2. I was then unable to pxe boot to the fog page (to register the client, memtest etc). I installed Kernel - 3.18.4 and resolved that issue.
Here is the video (excuse the auto focus). I have a task set to download. The video ends at the point that the machine restarts back to the fog pxe menu and the tasks shows complete.
[media=youtube]X29p6H78EXw[/media]
-
The machines were delivered to us from Dell w/ a french version on Win 7 installed - they have an OS loaded on them already.
I’ve also attempted this using a laptop that I have imaged prior and receive the same outcome.
-
This definitely sounds like what junkhacker states.
Your drives are completely uninitialized and cannot find a partition to boot from.
This isn’t a kernel issue. The unable to pxe boot sounds more like the file was just bad, not necessarily a direct problem with the kernel. This meaning, the kernel trying to load was wrong for the init and probably ended in a kernel panic, or in the case of memtest, the file memtest.bin was missing or not correct. My guess is you’ll still see issues with memtest of the file is bad as your redownloading of the kernel would have no affect on memtest directly.
To fix the partition problem try the steps here:
[url]http://fogproject.org/forum/threads/quick-format-to-ntfs-with-fog-for-noobs.10349/[/url]If this does not help, the other thing I’d think to check would be the format the mbr file is trying to push. If you do a download debug, it should pause you a whole bunch of times. When it gets to the No Extended Partitions point, ctrl + c out of it back to terminal.
Once in debug - download, you’ll get terminal prompt. Type the command fog and wait for the no extended partitions point and ctrl+c out back to the terminal. Then run fdisk -l, what’s the output.
-
do you mind upgrading to an svn version? there are a number of features that have been improved, and while i can’t guarantee that whatever is causing your problem has been “fixed” it is possible. at any rate, the debug mode in the newer versions lets you actually read what’s going on during a task instead of just blurring by.
my production server is currently running svn 2948 and appears to be stable. normally i would recommend updating to the latest svn, but i know that tom is working on a few things pretty heavily right now and a few features might be disabled or broken.
to update to version 2948:
[CODE]cd ~
mkdir svn
cd svn
svn checkout https://svn.code.sf.net/p/freeghost/code/trunk@2948
cd trunk/bin
sudo ./installfog.sh[/CODE] -
There’s only one feature that’s “broken/disabled” for right now.
That’s the group page membership capability to change the image right from that particular screen. Everything else should be stable and functional.
-
I am now running 2948. Same issue. Running through download debug now. I will report back shortly.
-
How does your partition layout look like? Please run this command on one of your clients (e.g. bootup in debug mode):
[CODE]sfdisk -d /dev/sda[/CODE]
Which files do you have on your FOG server?
[CODE]ls -al /images/DellAllinOne8GBWIN764[/CODE]
What image type is configured? Single Disk Multiple Partitions? -
ls -al /images/DellAllinOne8GBWIN764 shows:
d1.mbr
d1p1.img
d1p2.img
The image is multiple partition - single disk.sfdisk -d /dev/sda shows:
/dev/sda1/ : start= 2048, size= 204800, Id= 7, bootable
/dev/sda2/ : start= 206848, size= 976564224, Id= 7
/dev/sda3/ : start= 0, size=0, Id=0
/dev/sda4/ : start= 0, size=0, Id=0 -
after typing that… I realize the image is probably larger than 40gb. If our techs put 40gb drives in these machines - I have a bigger problem.
-
[quote=“Just10, post: 41992, member: 28415”]ls -al /images/DellAllinOne8GBWIN764 shows:
d1.mbr
d1p1.img
d1p2.img
The image is multiple partition - single disk.Any more on this? I am in exactly the same situation. Win7 image that is multiple partition - single disk. TFTP is verified working. When I run a debug and look at my disk and partition(s) it looks fine. I run a debug deploy and everything is fine except it never actually downloads anything. As I step through the steps everything appears okay and then it says it’s finished.[/quote]
-
Oh, and another thing I can add is that if I let the download (either via debug or normally) run it creates the correct partition table and MBR on the disk. Once it reboots if I check it it has done exactly what I’d expect. Just no file download.
-
[quote=“Just10, post: 41995, member: 28415”]after typing that… I realize the image is probably larger than 40gb. If our techs put 40gb drives in these machines - I have a bigger problem.[/quote]
So is this causing the problem in your case??Maybe we have another weird issue with partprobe again. Please run another debug download session. Type ‘fog’ and hit Enter till you see ‘Mounting File System . . .’ then press Ctrl+C to get back to the console.
[CODE]# dd if=/images/d1.mbr of=/dev/sda
…fogpartinfo --list-parts /dev/sda
…
ls -al /dev/sda*
…
partprobe /dev/sda
fogpartinfo --list-parts /dev/sda
…
ls -al /dev/sda*
…
hdparm -z /dev/sdafogpartinfo --list-parts /dev/sda
…
ls -al /dev/sda*
…[/CODE]
Sounds weird but I had a disk where device files were “missing” after running partprobe…[B]By the way, which version of FOG are you running, Jeff??[/B]
-
[quote=“Uncle Frank, post: 42045, member: 28116”]So is this causing the problem in your case??
[B]By the way, which version of FOG are you running, Jeff??[/B][/quote]
Uhh, I hate to admit it, but yes, my target disk was just slightly smaller than my original image. Interestingly, one reason I was confused and having issues after attempting to deploy an image was because FOG partitioned the disk with the desired size for the image. So when I ran a disk partitioning utility to check it the first thing I saw was an error because a partition was created beyond the limits of the disk. Weird it is even able to do that and not just error out.
So, replacing the target disk with a larger one resolved the issue for me. I need to go back and recreate my original image using a much smaller disk.
Running FOG 1.2.0
My suggestion for an added feature would be to do some sanity check for disk size and give some sort of feedback to the user if a target disk is too small.
Thanks for the help and the excellent cloning solution!
JF
-
is there a reason you can’t use a resizeable image type?
-
I just wanted to chime in - my issue was the target disk was slightly smaller than the original as well (physical to ssd and assuming, without double-checking).
