• Recent
    • Unsolved
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Multicasting with 0.33b?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    General
    4
    10
    2.9k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • D
      DanielJay
      last edited by

      I am having difficulties getting 0.33b to multicast images out. When I first started working on this it would load the partclone page and just sit there. I am not sure what has changed but now when I boot up the machines for a multicast job it sits at “Please Wait…”.

      I have gone through the post of: [url]http://fogproject.org/forum/threads/wiki-troubleshooting-multicast.22/[/url] and ran the commands at the top of the page for udp-sender and udp-receiver. Not sure if the commands at the bottom still work for 0.33b for sending the image and receiving the image via CLI?

      When I initially ran the udp-sender command the FOG server was on one subnet and the clients were on another. I could see the clients connect and receive the data that way even with a ttl of 1. I have since tried to change the server and clients to be on the same subnet just to see if my multicast routing was setup correctly and I am getting the same result.

      Has anybody done multicast with 0.33b?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Jaymes DriverJ
        Jaymes Driver Developer
        last edited by

        Honestly I don’t like using the multicast, so I hadn’t tested it. I do however set up groups and manage the image through the membership page. I will deploy to all 30 machines at once but only 10 of them will image at a time and from my experiences will image faster than multicast. My ~45gb image takes about 15-20 min per machine. In the past if I multicast each machine takes upwards of 2 hours and even then sometimes fails because a machine drops out or looses connection and bombs my entire lab.

        Try pushing your image out as a unicast to multiple machine and see if you can get by until someone fixes the multicast, you may find it is faster like I did 😉 .

        WARNING TO USERS: My comments are written completely devoid of emotion, do not mistake my concise to the point manner as a personal insult or attack.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • D
          DanielJay
          last edited by

          Jaymes,
          When you were multicasting were you doing identical hardware or different hardware? What was your link speed?

          I have 25 identical machines to image all connected via gigabit and a 10G uplink to network. I may end up doing unicast on these machines for now but would like to know if it is a FOG server problem or a network switch related problem.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • A
            ArchFan
            last edited by

            I did it at one point, but not with any of the revisions within the past month. Verify that the FogMulticastManager service is running - mine would do the same thing with the partclone screen until Tom helped me out with that step. If it’s not running, do a ‘sudo service FogMulticastManager start’ - that should start the service

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Jaymes DriverJ
              Jaymes Driver Developer
              last edited by

              [quote=“DanielJay, post: 24780, member: 23088”]Jaymes,
              When you were multicasting were you doing identical hardware or different hardware? What was your link speed?

              I have 25 identical machines to image all connected via gigabit and a 10G uplink to network. I may end up doing unicast on these machines for now but would like to know if it is a FOG server problem or a network switch related problem.[/quote]

              I have 29 identical machines at Gig link speed and 1 that is a newer model ( I usually image it manually since it is one machine and keep it out of the group so it doesn’t cause issues with hardware when pushing the image… JUST IN CASE. Plus the drivers for the machine aren’t included in the image yet due to laziness, but I have a driver disc I use for the one machine.

              WARNING TO USERS: My comments are written completely devoid of emotion, do not mistake my concise to the point manner as a personal insult or attack.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • D
                DanielJay
                last edited by

                I checked to see if the service was running by doing a: “ps -e | grep FOG” from the CLI and it showed the service was running.

                I decided to try downloading the image to one machine using unicast and that has failed. I am getting:
                “Storage Node ‘DefaultMember’ is open, but has recently failed for this HOST
                Unable to find a suitable Storage Node for transfer!”

                I have since opened my /opt/fog/.fogsettings file and copied the value of password into the password field of my default storage node. I have also copied that same password into the TFTP settings on the config page.
                After all of that was ran I restarted my NFS and TFTP servers. I am able to open up FileZilla and FTP to the FOG server using the fog user and that same password.

                Any suggestions on this issue?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • B
                  BigMan99211
                  last edited by

                  From my experience, most multicast issues come from an issue with your switch configuration.
                  Caution - Don’t use multicast on a production network during business hours…
                  I found out the hard way on this. My network bandwidth pegged out for the duration of transfer.
                  Multicast doesn’t care where the machines are that are getting imaged, as every port, on every switch on your network will get hit with the same data at the same time. You’re actually better off using unicast for 25 machines. Multicast is really only helpful if you have 100’s of machines to image in one night. <—emphasis on the NIGHT! 😄

                  "Failure is not an option. It come pre-installed on Windows…" - Anonymous

                  "Life is hard; It's harder if you're stupid" - John Wayne

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • D
                    DanielJay
                    last edited by

                    BigMan99211,
                    Multicast should not have issues if you have the network setup correctly. It is best if you use managed network switches and can run IGMP on your network. This would prevent the flood of traffic to all network ports.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Jaymes DriverJ
                      Jaymes Driver Developer
                      last edited by

                      [quote=“DanielJay, post: 24808, member: 23088”]BigMan99211,
                      Multicast should not have issues if you have the network setup correctly. It is best if you use managed network switches and can run IGMP on your network. This would prevent the flood of traffic to all network ports.[/quote]

                      This can also cause issues with trying to find the tftpboot server and your undionly.kpxe, be careful and take notes, I actually use the dnsmasq service because of this.

                      WARNING TO USERS: My comments are written completely devoid of emotion, do not mistake my concise to the point manner as a personal insult or attack.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • D
                        DanielJay
                        last edited by

                        [quote=“DanielJay, post: 24805, member: 23088”]I decided to try downloading the image to one machine using unicast and that has failed. I am getting:
                        “Storage Node ‘DefaultMember’ is open, but has recently failed for this HOST
                        Unable to find a suitable Storage Node for transfer!”

                        I have since opened my /opt/fog/.fogsettings file and copied the value of password into the password field of my default storage node. I have also copied that same password into the TFTP settings on the config page.
                        After all of that was ran I restarted my NFS and TFTP servers. I am able to open up FileZilla and FTP to the FOG server using the fog user and that same password.

                        Any suggestions on this issue?[/quote]

                        Jaymes,
                        Any idea what might be causing this above issue?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • 1 / 1
                        • First post
                          Last post

                        199

                        Online

                        12.0k

                        Users

                        17.3k

                        Topics

                        155.2k

                        Posts
                        Copyright © 2012-2024 FOG Project