FOG deploy: partitions 4 and 5 too big for disk

[madeyem]

@sebastian-roth said in FOG deploy: partitions 4 and 5 too big for disk:

@madeyem Don’t you have a so called master machine that you use to build your “golden setup” on to capture an image from (the same machine every time)?

Unfortunately not.

Not that I know of. We are missing some information here. No idea why this fails in your specific case. Does not seem to be a general issue.

I can say, that I did not have any problems under FOG 1.5.7, which I used for a long time. I will see, what I can do.

[Sebastian Roth]

@madeyem said in FOG deploy: partitions 4 and 5 too big for disk:

I can say, that I did not have any problems under FOG 1.5.7, which I used for a long time. I will see, what I can do.

I can say that FOG 1.5.7 would not have been able to shrink this layout either I am pretty sure!

[madeyem]

@sebastian-roth said in FOG deploy: partitions 4 and 5 too big for disk:

@madeyem said in FOG deploy: partitions 4 and 5 too big for disk:

I can say, that I did not have any problems under FOG 1.5.7, which I used for a long time. I will see, what I can do.

I can say that FOG 1.5.7 would not have been able to shrink this layout either I am pretty sure!

ok

[Sebastian Roth]

@madeyem Ok, I had another look at this and I have to say that my initial thought was right. Your issue is caused by the same problem discussed in the other forum topic mentioned before.

I can say that FOG 1.5.7 would not have been able to shrink this layout either I am pretty sure!

Proofed myself wrong!

I will look into fixing what is causing this in the inits. Will let you know as soon as I have it ready for testing.

[madeyem]

@sebastian-roth said in FOG deploy: partitions 4 and 5 too big for disk:

@madeyem Ok, I had another look at this and I have to say that my initial thought was right. Your issue is caused by the same problem discussed in the other forum topic mentioned before.

I can say that FOG 1.5.7 would not have been able to shrink this layout either I am pretty sure!

Proofed myself wrong!

I will look into fixing what is causing this in the inits. Will let you know as soon as I have it ready for testing.

Ok, thank you!

[Sebastian Roth]

@madeyem Please download this FOS init and try capture and deploy again. The issue should be fixed.

[madeyem]

@sebastian-roth said in FOG deploy: partitions 4 and 5 too big for disk:

@madeyem Please download this FOS init and try capture or deploy again. The issue should be fixed.

I’m currently on vacation for two weeks. I will report back, as soon as I’m back in the office and have tested it. Thanks!

[madeyem]

@sebastian-roth said in FOG deploy: partitions 4 and 5 too big for disk:

@madeyem Please download this FOS init and try capture or deploy again. The issue should be fixed.

I replaced the default init.xz with the one you linked and tried to deploy, but unfortunately I still get the same error message. The correct init version is shown (20211009).

I can try to re-capture an image as soon as I have one of the SSD machines at my disposal (or when the new PCs I ordered finally arrive).

[madeyem]

FYI:
Just for the fun of it, I tried to deploy an Windows 7 image from 2018, which worked perfectly fine, but all my Windows 10 images fail.

[Sebastian Roth]

@madeyem said in FOG deploy: partitions 4 and 5 too big for disk:

I replaced the default init.xz with the one you linked and tried to deploy, but unfortunately I still get the same error message.

Sure thing. As I said in my last post you should capture and deploy. In your case the already captured image doesn’t have the proper shrunken partition layout and therefore can’t be deployed to a smaller size disk I suppose. If you try deploy those Win 10 images to a large disk, do they fail just the same way? If so I ask you to take a picture of the error on screen and post that here.

[madeyem]

@sebastian-roth said in FOG deploy: partitions 4 and 5 too big for disk:

Sure thing. As I said in my last post you should capture and deploy. In your case the already captured image doesn’t have the proper shrunken partition layout and therefore can’t be deployed to a smaller size disk I suppose. If you try deploy those Win 10 images to a large disk, do they fail just the same way? If so I ask you to take a picture of the error on screen and post that here.

Ok, I think I might get my hands on one of the SSD machines later this (or next) week. I will then re-capture, deploy and report back.

[madeyem]

@sebastian-roth

I re-captured an image on a SSD machine (with the new init) and deployed to the HDD machine, but got the same error message as before.

From the re-captured image:

d1.minimum.partitions:

label: gpt
label-id: 8C0CB60E-93F5-4C14-B633-3852928F826C
device: /dev/nvme0n1
unit: sectors
first-lba: 34
last-lba: 1000215182
sector-size: 512

/dev/nvme0n1p1 : start=        2048, size=     1433600, type=C12A7328-F81F-11D2-BA4B-00A0C93EC93B, uuid=2AFFEC30-5F77-4C6B-BA7C-902A01A971E1, name="EFI system partition", attrs="GUID:63"

/dev/nvme0n1p2 : start=     1435648, size=      262144, type=E3C9E316-0B5C-4DB8-817D-F92DF00215AE, uuid=E8336B4A-8C8F-48F5-85DE-E6237B7A372F, name="Microsoft reserved partition", attrs="GUID:63"

/dev/nvme0n1p3 : start=     1697792, size=   995426761, type=EBD0A0A2-B9E5-4433-87C0-68B6B72699C7, uuid=38131294-BD57-43F5-ACE4-2E1413614C9A, name="Basic data partition"

/dev/nvme0n1p4 : start=   997126144, size=     1060864, type=DE94BBA4-06D1-4D40-A16A-BFD50179D6AC, uuid=A31B261E-E3EB-4671-BE66-F71AEEB51DB8, attrs="RequiredPartition GUID:63"

/dev/nvme0n1p5 : start=   998187520, size=     2027520, type=DE94BBA4-06D1-4D40-A16A-BFD50179D6AC, uuid=84072955-EDFD-4E05-84E6-C3A6C50CDB30, name="attrs=\x22RequiredPartition GUID:63

d1.partitions:

label: gpt
label-id: 8C0CB60E-93F5-4C14-B633-3852928F826C
device: /dev/nvme0n1
unit: sectors
first-lba: 34
last-lba: 1000215182
sector-size: 512

/dev/nvme0n1p1 : start=        2048, size=     1433600, type=C12A7328-F81F-11D2-BA4B-00A0C93EC93B, uuid=2AFFEC30-5F77-4C6B-BA7C-902A01A971E1, name="EFI system partition", attrs="GUID:63"

/dev/nvme0n1p2 : start=     1435648, size=      262144, type=E3C9E316-0B5C-4DB8-817D-F92DF00215AE, uuid=E8336B4A-8C8F-48F5-85DE-E6237B7A372F, name="Microsoft reserved partition", attrs="GUID:63"

/dev/nvme0n1p3 : start=     1697792, size=   995426761, type=EBD0A0A2-B9E5-4433-87C0-68B6B72699C7, uuid=38131294-BD57-43F5-ACE4-2E1413614C9A, name="Basic data partition"

/dev/nvme0n1p4 : start=   997126144, size=     1060864, type=DE94BBA4-06D1-4D40-A16A-BFD50179D6AC, uuid=A31B261E-E3EB-4671-BE66-F71AEEB51DB8, attrs="RequiredPartition GUID:63"

/dev/nvme0n1p5 : start=   998187520, size=     2027520, type=DE94BBA4-06D1-4D40-A16A-BFD50179D6AC, uuid=84072955-EDFD-4E05-84E6-C3A6C50CDB30, name="attrs=\x22RequiredPartition GUID:63"

The third partition still seems to be too big (i.e. not shrunk), do you agree?

[Sebastian Roth]

@madeyem said in FOG deploy: partitions 4 and 5 too big for disk:

...
/dev/nvme0n1p5 : ... name="attrs=\x22RequiredPartition GUID:63"
...

Wohoooo, it still has that same name/attrs problem. No idea why as I thought I had fixed that.

Edit: OMG, after some more digging I found that the change I made and committed to github didn’t make it into the test init I updated a few days after I asked you to test. My fault, because I work on another issue with someone else using the same test init. I am sorry. Please download the latest init from github once again, re-capture the image and we should see it work this time I am fairly sure. Pay attention to the Init Version: 20211107

[madeyem]

@sebastian-roth

With the new init (20211107) I re-captured from a SSD machine and was finally able to deploy to a HDD machine. So I guess the fixes can be implemented in the next official release. Thank you Sebastian!

[Sebastian Roth]

@madeyem Thanks heaps for testing again and letting me know! As well thanks for your patience.