Very slow cloning speed on specific model
@Quazz Do you have some manual as I can upgrade the Partclone?
@oleg-knysh You may also be interested in trying out an experimental init.xz that uses a newer version of partclone. Though the github issue does not indicate this resolves the issue for them, perhaps it will in this case. It’s worth a shot anyway.
@Quazz I checked, exactly same disks were in the previous HP laptop model - 840 G5. So I think the next test I’ll do it’s downgrading BIOS version to the previous version.
@oleg-knysh Here is the issue on the partclone github: https://github.com/Thomas-Tsai/partclone/issues/112
Currently still unresolved unfortunately.
I can only recommend trying to update BIOS and update firmware of the disks.
Another “Baggy” laptop with a low Partclone speed:
HP 840 G6
SSD: Toshiba KXGZNV512G
Let’s name it Laptop A
Let’s name it Laptop B
- SSD A (from a buggy laptop) inserted to laptop B - worked fine (SSD itself is not a problem)
- SSD B (from a good laptop) inserted to laptop A - worked fine (the laptop itself is not a problem)
- SSD A inserted back to the laptop A - worked very slow
Very strange situation. Partclone is not working with a specific laptop and specific SSD.
@Quazz I’ll check SSD model for the next “baggy” laptop. Today for Crucial P1 NVMe M.2 1TB worked without issues
@oleg-knysh I do recall a specific SSD model (or multiple) having absurdly low speeds in partclone.
Do you know what models they are?
The new test ran without this problem. The Partclone ran fast as usual and imaging took less than a minute.
Maybe it depends on the type of SSD disk…?
@Sebastian-Roth I don’t know how, but it helped. Maybe something else happened at the same time. As I wrote need to more tests
@oleg-knysh This doesn’t make sense. Removing the partitions manually doesn’t influence the speed.
The workaround was found.
When I used diskpart and removed all partitions from the disk before cloning (used boot from regular Win10 installation usb media), after that Partclone ran as usual.
Need to test on more laptops to be sure.
@oleg-knysh This is a very strange issue. The only recommendation/question I have at the moment is what version of the FOS Kernel are you using? The latest version is 4.19.64
I also wonder if you update to the latest version of FOG (1.5.7) to see if any of the fixes since 1.5.4 will address this issue. I don’t have a high confidence that it will fix this speed issue. I know it will solve some disk structure problems.