• Recent
    • Unsolved
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Issue imaging with Surface Pro

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved
    FOG Problems
    3
    21
    4.7k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J
      jemerson93 @george1421
      last edited by

      @george1421 Okay going to go in order from your post.

      When inputting lsusb, I receive the following
      Bus 002 Device 002: ID 045e:0927
      Bus 001 Device 002: ID 045e:09c0
      Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002
      Bus 002 Device 003: ID 045e:094a
      Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003

      Manufacturer & Model: Microsoft USB Ethernet Adapter Model 1821
      Hadware ID: USB/VID_045E&PID_0927&REV_3100
      USB/VID_045E&PID_0927
      Surface Pro Model 1807 (Looks to be the 2017 model)
      All of the Surface Pro’s I have had issues with are either the 2017 model or 2018 model. All had LTE support enabled

      If I use a generic usb nic, it does not even PXE boot on a Surface. I have had success using a generic USB nic with other tablets though.

      george1421G 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • george1421G
        george1421 Moderator @jemerson93
        last edited by george1421

        @jemerson93 Well the sloppy fix is to plug in both usb ethernet adapters. Once to pxe boot the computer and one once FOS starts. Both plugged into each wall jack ahead of time. I said its not a nice solution, but in a pinch it should work.

        I’ll dig into the device since you provided a quality hardware ID.

        For translation to linux [045E:0927] for the hardware ID.

        Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

        J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J
          jemerson93 @george1421
          last edited by

          @george1421 George, this Surface only has 1 USB.

          Here is what I attempted. Connect Microsoft usb nic, boot to FOG, select deploy image
          As soon as I selected the image, I unplugged it and connected the generic one. I received the wwan error but after it failed a few times, it went into eht0 (this is with the generic usb nic) but I received a new error.

          0_1534375118816_image1.jpeg

          If I can get this error fixed, at least while you look into the microsoft nic (which I appreciate so much as this is out of my knowledge), this may work as you said as a sloppy fix

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • george1421G
            george1421 Moderator @jemerson93
            last edited by george1421

            @jemerson93 Back on point here. I looked and that usb ethernet adapter is not currently supported by the Linux kernel at least as of 4.17.13 (which is pretty new). I did find a FOG forum post ( https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/10943/surface-pro-4-registration-issues ) that discusses that exact network adapter. So it appears that the FOG Project may have a patch that enables that network adapter.

            Please try this development kernel: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1WPv4HeMrWdWu9uyOyVaoJkBX3A9EGi-t

            1. Download that file as bzImage41713m and place it in /var/www/html/fog/service/ipxe directory on your fog server.
            2. Goto the fog gui and locate the the computer in host management where this ethernet adapter is connected. There is an entry for Host Kernel enter bzImage41713m into that field.
            3. Pxe boot the target computer to run your capture/deployment.
            4. Note any error messages in regards to getting a dhcp address.

            I really don’t know if this will work (the FOG Project patch) or not for your install. This development kernel has quite a bit more hardware support added than previous releases of the FOS kernel. Will something else break? Probably…??, but it shouldn’t.

            Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

            J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J
              jemerson93 @george1421
              last edited by

              @george1421 said in Issue imaging with Surface Pro:

              bzImage41713m

              Did as you said, kicked in the eth0 interface and got further. Now running into this issue.

              0_1534434287024_FOG Issue2.jpg

              Tom ElliottT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Tom ElliottT
                Tom Elliott @jemerson93
                last edited by

                @jemerson93 unable to find image store means fos cannot see your image files anywhere. Do they exist? If you have other nodes, do those nodes also have the image?

                Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG! Get in contact with me (chat bubble in the top right corner) if you want to join in.

                Web GUI issue? Please check apache error (debian/ubuntu: /var/log/apache2/error.log, centos/fedora/rhel: /var/log/httpd/error_log) and php-fpm log (/var/log/php*-fpm.log)

                Please support FOG if you like it: https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/Support_FOG

                J 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • J
                  jemerson93 @Tom Elliott
                  last edited by

                  @tom-elliott I have 1 storage node and I just tested that specific image (which used to work) on another laptop and it had the same issue.

                  When checking /images, I am finding all of my images except for that one listed. I will re-upload it now and test.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • J
                    jemerson93 @Tom Elliott
                    last edited by

                    @tom-elliott @george1421

                    Update. I tested another one of our images just to test imaging and it successfully imaged. I appreciate the assistance so much.

                    I do have 2 questions. First question, I noticed when using this kernel compared to the current kernels I am using, I am back to the issue with the long erasing MBR/GPT partitions. Anyway to fix that with this custom kernel or just need to deal with it?

                    Secondly, is there a way for me add other usb nics as I find issues, or how to find a kernel that supports them instead of opening a forum post if I run into issues. Reason I ask is we have a Dell USB nic for some of the new XPS models and I have yet to test it.

                    george1421G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • george1421G
                      george1421 Moderator @jemerson93
                      last edited by

                      @jemerson93 said in Issue imaging with Surface Pro:

                      I am back to the issue with the long erasing MBR/GPT partitions

                      Well that tells me the kernel patch I applied didn’t address the slow gpt partition creation (same issue with FOS 4.17.0)

                      @tom-elliott The nic was enabled by adding

                          {REALTEK_USB_DEVICE(VENDOR_ID_MICROSOFT, 0x0927)}
                      

                      to drivers/net/usb/r8152.c

                      @jemerson93 To your adding other usb nics. The answer is sure, all you need to do is patch the linux kernel source from http://www.kernel.org and then compile the linux kernel.

                      Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

                      J 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • J
                        jemerson93 @george1421
                        last edited by

                        @george1421 George I’ll look into that for other USB nics (my Linux knowledge is not the greatest but growing)

                        I can deal with the longer erasing mbr/gpt partition for those specific devices (hoping newer kernels may resolve it)

                        Thanks again for the help! So greatly appreciated.

                        george1421G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • J
                          jemerson93 @george1421
                          last edited by

                          @george1421 Also I’m not sure how to change this to solved.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • george1421G
                            george1421 Moderator @jemerson93
                            last edited by

                            @jemerson93 The mbr/gpt issue needs to be resolved, period. The truth may be this slow creation process may be a ‘feature’ of 4.17.x kernel and not a bug. I can tell you this issue is still on the developers plate (which is getting overloaded at the moment). Please give them a bit to get back from holiday and back in business.

                            Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • 1
                            • 2
                            • 2 / 2
                            • First post
                              Last post

                            160

                            Online

                            12.0k

                            Users

                            17.3k

                            Topics

                            155.2k

                            Posts
                            Copyright © 2012-2024 FOG Project