• Recent
    • Unsolved
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    OS drive SSD or SATA

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Hardware Compatibility
    5
    7
    2.0k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J
      Julianh
      last edited by

      Hi All,

      As the data moves between the “Stroge” node and the client, there seems little point in using a SSD instead of a normal hard disk as regards speed.

      However, I was thinking of using a small, 60 GB SSD purely because it’s small and won’t take a drive bay.

      Out of curiosity, am I correct? The imaging process will be no faster.

      Thanks

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • S
        Sebastian Roth Moderator
        last edited by

        @Julianh Quite often disk IO is a bottle neck. Therefore I suppose imaging will be faster on the SSD drive.

        Web GUI issue? Please check apache error (debian/ubuntu: /var/log/apache2/error.log, centos/fedora/rhel: /var/log/httpd/error_log) and php-fpm log (/var/log/php*-fpm.log)

        Please support FOG if you like it: https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/Support_FOG

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Q
          Quazz Moderator
          last edited by

          Clients are usually the bottleneck, an SSD and faster CPU there helps a ton.

          I don’t think an SSD on the FOG server will make a huge difference for top speed (depending on the state of the hard drive), but it may increase concurrency.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • george1421G
            george1421 Moderator
            last edited by

            I started doing some benchmarking on making fog go faster here: https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/10459/can-you-make-fog-imaging-go-fast
            Warning: that post has a ton of data in it as I tried to document each step

            I ran out of extra time to work on it consistently. There are benchmarking numbers in there. If you have a single hdd disk in your fog server AND you are trying to deploy multiple unicast images to different computers at the same time a ssd in the fog server will help quite a bit.

            For fog to go really fast you need 4 things.

            1. Fast disk subsystem in fog server (helps greatly when sending out multiple simultaneous images at the same time)
            2. Fast network infrastructure
            3. Fast NFS configuration
            4. Fast target computer

            Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J
              Julianh
              last edited by

              Hi all,

              I don’t think I was clear. Sorry.

              I’m going to have a seperate SSD Raid array for the images. but I was going to use a SSD as the OS drive, for no other reason than it’s not going to use a drive bay. I was just curios if it would make FOG run faster.

              Thanks

              george1421G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • george1421G
                george1421 Moderator @Julianh
                last edited by

                @julianh A SSD for only the OS will not add much value making FOG go fast. The critical data path is from /images -> nfs -> network -> target computer.

                Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                • x23piracyX
                  x23piracy
                  last edited by x23piracy

                  it’s all about network througput and storage fastness comparing to the network speed 😉
                  would be interesting to see the deployment speed with a native 10gbit lan and ssd raid for storage 😛 …and sure the client should have ssd too.

                  But i can tell you 1gbit lan and hdd in the storage node can easily deploy a 16gb image within 2 minutes to a system with ssd 😉 i see it daily happen again and again hehe

                  ║▌║█║▌│║▌║▌█

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • 1 / 1
                  • First post
                    Last post

                  187

                  Online

                  12.0k

                  Users

                  17.3k

                  Topics

                  155.2k

                  Posts
                  Copyright © 2012-2024 FOG Project