Differences between acronis and FOG
I could help with some disadvantages of acronis, and some advantages of FOG, I would like to make a comparative picture of these two software, clearly benefiting FOG.
I feel I should add the only reason FOG doesn’t win on “disk to disk imaging” is because of how it’s configured to operate vs an inability to do such a thing. It can most definitely do Disk to Disk imaging, but it’s written to take advantage of mass imaging particularly over network.
@Jair I’ve used both, I’ve also used others. Fog is the clear winner in all scenarios except local disk to disk imaging. For that, clonezilla is the clear winner. I can give a lot more detail when I’m back at a keyboard after the weekend. Feel free to post what you have.