Imac 27" ipxe boot
-
@Quazz
Hi, we just tried with all snponly files and each time gotConfiguring (net0 38:c9:86:12:xx:xx)..............No configuration method succeeded (http://ipxe.org/040ee186)
as a response.
-
@Seb-B said in Imac 27" ipxe boot:
Well this is a different/interesting error.
This is saying that it can’t get a dhcp address on interface net0. But what is interesting is that it now picks up the mac address of the nic. This tells me that the nic is initializing (!!). Can you confirm what device is
38:c9:86:12:xx:xx
If this was a Dell box, at this point I would say your issue could be related to spanning tree, where the building switch is not using one of the fast spanning tree protocols like RSTP, fast stp, etc.
-
If my memory is serving me correctly, there was a similar thread about this in the past, I’ll see if I can dig it up from the abyss. If I am remembering correctly they other person got it working.
-
Hi,
Yes the mac address of the device is correct.
I don’t think it could be a spanning tree since
a - I a m plugged on a switch port with no spanning tree
b - other iMacs(21.5") on the same port have no problem getting through this step
c - I think using the efi file with the 10sec delay would have worked if this was the case (not sure though)Once again, I could be wrong but spanning tree issues don’t seem logical to me in this case.
Thanks anyhow.
-
@Seb-B is the 21.5" iMac an older generation than the 27" iMac?
With the efi kernel that shows the mac address, please install an unmanaged switch between the building switch and the target computer. This is a quick test to see if its a spanning tree/green ethernet issue.
Understand we are now to the point if guessing a bit, since this is not a FOG issue but an iPXE booting issue.
As long as we are guessing, is the firmware up to date on this target computer?
-
The “working” Imacs are from late 2014 while the “not working” ones are from late 2015.
I’m already plugged on a non manageable switch, that’s what I was trying to tell you in my last reply.
Yes I checked the firmware for the IMac and it is up to date.As for the guessing, I checked this post and checked the cable integrity just in case but to no avail so far…
-
@Seb-B On the windows side, we’ve seen newer nic adapters support some more advanced functions (like green ethernet 802.3az) that seems to be causing issues with pxe booting. The unmanaged switch also blocks this type if pre-link protocols (which is good for us).
When you get the error pxe booting does it give you an option to press ‘s’ to get to an ipxe command prompt?
-
Yes it does, I tried some commands but I’m not really familiar withe the ipxe environment.
-
@Seb-B OK, its been a while since I had to mess with the iPXE kernel. But the first thing I would try is to get to the iPXE command prompt. Wait 30 seconds and then key in
dhcp net0
that will instruct the kernel to try to pick up a dhcp address.I’m going to have to create a similar issue here in my test lab to see if I can remember the commands to confirm the network adapter is ready. But starting with dhcp after 30 seconds will tell us if there is a timeout involved.
-
Ok, I’ve done that after waiting 30 secs and still got the no configuration method succeeded message.
-
@Seb-B Is your fog server, dhcp server, and target computer on the same subnet?
-
Actually no, the dhcp and fog server are on a dedicated server vlan while the host is on another vlan.
However, we have half a hundred stations on this configuration and never encountered any trouble so far.
We did a test where we check on the dhcp server while running
dhcp net0
and get no request on the dhcp.We tried with several efi files and never got anything showing up on the dhcp.
-
@Seb-B Well my thought was to have them on the same subnet (for testing), then setup tcpdump to capture any dhcp being emitted from the mac when you issue the
dhcp net0
ordhcp net1
command. You can install tcpdump on the fog server or in your case setup wireshark to capture ports 67, 68 if done from the FOG server 67,68,69,4011 all udp ports.What I’m interested in is the target computer actually requesting anything on the network wire, or is there still an iPXE <-> Hardware issue. By doing the capture from the fog server and all being on the same subnet you can inspect the entire pxe booting process, from dhcp to tftp moving of the file to the target computer.
-
Ok so we tried that and ran tcpdump on both the dhcp server and the fog server and didn’t get any result pas the bootp part where we get to choose ipxe from the mac boot menu.
The tcpdump command we ran:
tcpdump 'host 172.16.xxx.xxx and (portrange 67-69 or 4011)'
The result :
17:13:53.000214 IP 172.16.xxx.xxx.bootpc > 255.255.255.255.bootps: BOOTP/DHCP, Request from 38:c9:86:12:xx:xx (oui Unknown), length 295 17:13:53.000463 IP Server.DOMAINNAME.bootps > 172.16.xxx.xxx.bootpc: BOOTP/DHCP, Reply, length 303 17:13:53.000569 IP Server.DOMAINNAME.bootps > 172.16.xxx.xxx.bootpc: BOOTP/DHCP, Reply, length 321 17:13:53.000643 IP Server.DOMAINNAME.bootps > 172.16.xxx.xxx.bootpc: BOOTP/DHCP, Reply, length 321
And as soon as we click on the ipxe option, nothing is received
-
@Seb-B Ok then just to confirm, when you hit ‘s’ on the target computer and dropped to the iPXE kernel command prompt, and then waiting 30 seconds (for STP to timeout and start forwarding the port), when you issued a
dhcp net0
ordhcp net1
nothing was detected by tcpdump? I’m trying to see if the iMac/iPXE is sending any data requests that might indicate it can talk out the network port.Secondly since the target computer is on a different subnet from the fog server you will not see the broadcast messages it is sending out, you will only see the unicast messages to the computer you are running tcpdump on.
-
@george1421 Just for clarity (and my ignorance of Macs) we are talking about a desktop computer with a built in ethernet adapter, right? You are not using a usb ethernet dongle adapter.
-
Hi,
let me sum up the tests so far, so that it’s clear for everyone (me included) :
-
With the host and servers on a different vlan
- while booting ipxe from the mac startup menu, nothing is detected by tcpdump on the fog and dhcp server
- while on the ipxe kernel command prompt, after waiting 30 secs and launching
dhcp
,dhcp net0
, ordhcp net1
, nothing is detected by tcpdump either on the fog or the dhcp server
-
With the host and servers on the same vlan
- while booting ipxe from the mac startup menu, nothing is detected by tcpdump on the fog and dhcp server
- while on the ipxe kernel command prompt, after waiting 30 secs and launching
dhcp
,dhcp net0
, ordhcp net1
, nothing is detected by tcpdump either on the fog or the dhcp server
We also tried with the default .efi file but didn’t get any more result in tcpdump…
It doesn’t seem it can use the NIC properly once in ipxe, we might try a tcp dump without filter except the source to see if anything is sent once the ipxe is loaded, which I doubt at this pointTo address your other question, yes it is a built-in NIC in a desktop computer with no dongle whatsoever…
-
-
@Seb-B said:
we might try a tcp dump without filter except the source to see if anything is sent once the ipxe is loaded, which I doubt at this point
Yes, please do so as DHCP messages usually don’t have IP addresses set in the IP header yet - sure because the client is asking to get an IP! DHCP and TFTP are both UDP while lots of other traffic is TCP. So using tcpdump with filter
udp
is a good start I reckon. -
@Seb-B FWIW: This is the preferred tcpdump query:
tcpdump -w output.pcap port 67 or port 68 or port 69 or port 411
if executed on the fog server. -
George,
I ran this command on the Fog server while running a
dhcp net0
on the client and got no resulttcpdump: listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 262144 bytes 0 packets captured 0 packets received by filter 0 packets dropped by kernel
With a 24ko wireshark file with no visible data.
I also tried with another efi file with no difference in the tcpdump results.I can’t try on the dhcp sever right now as it is in use for something else. I’ll give it a shot tomorrow morning.
Thanks again to both of you.