Intel Raid0 Image Capture

[jpmartin]

@george1421 We’re on Raid0, if that makes a difference.

[george1421]

@jpmartin OK here is what I did.

1. Installed 2 test hard drives in the 780
2. Changed the 780 disk mode to Raid
3. Booted the system and went into the Raid setup <Ctrl-I>
4. Created a new Raid0 array (Name Volume0)
5. I used my FOS usb in the debug grub entry I added “mdraid=true”
6. Booted off the FOS USB stick and it hung after loading the inits

I remember that Tom upgraded the kernel after I created my FOS USB so I downloaded the latest firmware and inits to the fos-usb stick. This kernel was 4.6.2 (not sure what was before)
7. I again booted the FOS engine from the USB stick.
8. I inspected /proc/mdstat and received the following

Personalities : [linear] [raid0] [raid1] [raid10] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] [multipath] [faulty]
md126 : active raid0 sda[1] sdb[0]
      156307456 blocks super external:/md127/0 128k chunks

md127 : inactive sdb[1](S) sda[0](S)
      4856 blocks super external:imsm

unused devices: <none>

9. Hey! the kernel saw the fake raid!
10. Now lets see if mdadm understands it mdadm -D /dev/md126

/dev/md126:
      Container : /dev/md/imsm0, member 0
     Raid Level : raid0
     Array Size : 156307456 (149.07 GiB 160.06 GB)
   Raid Devices : 2
  Total Devices : 2

          State : clean
 Active Devices : 2
Working Devices : 2
 Failed Devices : 0
  Spare Devices : 0

     Chunk Size : 128K


           UUID : d0202e14:9f7ca368:a44d0646:e4480443
    Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
       1       8        0        0      active sync   /dev/sda
       0       8       16        1      active sync   /dev/sdb

11. Nice!
12. I wondered if it was real or a mirage 'fdisk /dev/md126`

Welcome to fdisk (util-linux 2.27.1).
Changes will remain in memory only, until you decide to write them.
Be careful before using the write command.

Device does not contain a recognized partition table.
Created a new DOS disklabel with disk identifier 0x7f7c460d.

13. I was able to create a partion on the disk

Disk /dev/md126: 149.1 GiB, 160058834944 bytes, 312614912 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 131072 bytes / 262144 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x7f7c460d

Device       Boot Start       End   Sectors   Size Id Type
/dev/md126p1       2048 312614911 312612864 149.1G 83 Linux

14. I wonder if I can format it? mkfs -t ext4 /dev/md126p1

mke2fs 1.42.13 (17-May-2015)
Creating filesystem with 39076608 4k blocks and 9773056 inodes
Filesystem UUID: ba6c9de0-0032-4fbc-82c3-054bbb92df20
Superblock backups stored on blocks:
        32768, 98304, 163840, 229376, 294912, 819200, 884736, 1605632, 2654208,
        4096000, 7962624, 11239424, 20480000, 23887872

Allocating group tables: done
Writing inode tables: done
Creating journal (32768 blocks): done
Writing superblocks and filesystem accounting information: done

15. Well can I mount it? mount -t ext4 /dev/md126p1 /mnt

# df
Filesystem     1K-blocks  Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/root          95538 82836      7897  92% /
/dev/md126p1   153721892 60864 145829324   1% /mnt

16. Success!!

So now to turn to FOG

I ran out of time to play for today.

But I updated the host definition with
Host Kernel Arguments: mdraid=true
Host Primary Disk: /dev/md126

The image deploy threw an error.

Seems like you are trying to restore to an empty disk. Be aware that this most probably will cause trouble

No image file found that would match the partitions to be restored
args passed /dev/md126 /images/WIN7ENTX64 all

Conclusion: The array is there and I can mount it. We just need to identify why this error is being thrown.

I also saw a device /dev/md/Volume0_0 which seemed to match the name of the array I created in the Intel firmware.

[Sebastian Roth]

@george1421 Great stuff man! Just wondering that you had the same md127 : inactive ... Possibly that’s just the way it is with those fake RAID controllers?

@jpmartin George’s mdadm -D /dev/md126 seems to be very handy and informative. Give that a try!

No image file found that would match the partitions to be restored
args passed /dev/md126 /images/WIN7ENTX64 all

Guess that’s just a matter of tuning the init scripts to make this work. Will have a look tomorrow. Marking this unread…

[george1421]

I left the FOS kernel running. Now that I’m home I’m able to remote into FOS to continue debugging.

Looking at what FOS has done so far, I can see that it did create the partitions

Disk /dev/md126: 149.1 GiB, 160058834944 bytes, 312614912 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 131072 bytes / 262144 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x9bfaf142

Device       Boot   Start       End   Sectors   Size Id Type
/dev/md126p1 *       2048   1023999   1021952   499M  7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/md126p2      1024000 312614911 311590912 148.6G  7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT

I’m going to keep walking down the fog.download script to see where its falling down.

Here is the exact error:

 * Attempting to expand/fill partitions..............Done
 * Press [Enter] key to continue

 * Seems like you are trying to restore to an empty disk. Be aware this will most probably cause trouble.

   +--------------------------------+
   |  Attempting to download image  |
   +--------------------------------+
   |         Using Partclone        |
   +--------------------------------+
##############################################################################
#                                                                            #
#                         An error has been detected!                        #
#                                                                            #
##############################################################################
No image file(s) found that would match the partition(s) to be restored (performRestore)
   Args Passed: /dev/md126 /images/WIN7ENTSP1X6401 all

Its dieing somewhere in this section in funcs.sh in the performRestore() sub.

    local disk_number=1
    local part_number=0
    local restoreparts=""
    local mainuuidfilename=""
    [[ $imgType =~ [Nn] ]] && local tmpebrfilename=""
    for disk in $disks; do
        mainuuidfilename=""
        mainUUIDFileName "$imagePath" "$disk_number"
        getValidRestorePartitions "$disk" "$disk_number" "$imagePath" "$restoreparts"
        [[ -z $restoreparts ]] && handleError "No image file(s) found that would match the partition(s) to be restored (${FUNCNAME[0]})\n   Args Passed: $*"
        for restorepart in $restoreparts; do

[george1421]

With the last bit of brain power I have left today I think I narrowed it down to the following (I don’t know what I’m looking at only that it doesn’t work"

In /usr/share/fog/lib/funcs.sh at function: getPartitions()

There is a call to lsblk that should be returning something, but its returning and empty string instead.

This is the command
lsblk -I 3,8,9,179,259 -lpno KNAME,TYPE /dev/md126 | awk '{if ($2 ~ /part/) print $1}'

If I shorten the command to just the lsblk without the awk I get

# lsblk -I 3,8,9,179,259 -lpno KNAME,TYPE /dev/md126
/dev/md126   raid0
/dev/md126p1 md
/dev/md126p2 md

If I run the full command on my fog server using /dev/sda I get

# lsblk -I 3,8,9,179,259 -lpno KNAME,TYPE /dev/sda | awk '{if ($2 ~ /part/) print $1}'
/dev/sda1
/dev/sda2

Running lsblk alone on FOS

lsblk /dev/md126
NAME      MAJ:MIN RM   SIZE RO TYPE  MOUNTPOINT
md126       9:126  0 149.1G  0 raid0
|-md126p1 259:4    0   499M  0 md
`-md126p2 259:5    0 148.6G  0 md

Running lsblk alone on FOG

# lsblk
NAME            MAJ:MIN RM  SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
fd0               2:0    1    4K  0 disk
sda               8:0    0   20G  0 disk
├─sda1            8:1    0  500M  0 part /boot
└─sda2            8:2    0 19.5G  0 part
  ├─centos-root 253:0    0 17.5G  0 lvm  /
  └─centos-swap 253:1    0    2G  0 lvm  [SWAP]
sr0              11:0    1    4G  0 rom

Hopefully the devs can make heads or tails of why the lsblk command is not returning the expected value.

[edit] Heck, now that I spell it out I see the issue. The awk regular expression is only looking for part in the type column. awk '{if ($2 ~ /part/) print $1}' But the mdraid its type md not part !!!

[Tom Elliott]

@george1421 what was the function the error came from?

[george1421]

@Tom-Elliott getPartitons from download. I’ll have to look at the code again

[edit] here is the call chain
fog.download:restorePartition->funcs.sh:runPartprobe->funcs.sh:performRestore->funcs.sh:getValidRestorePartitions->funcs.sh:getPartitions

[george1421]

Updating the trouble code
lsblk -I 3,8,9,179,259 -lpno KNAME,TYPE /dev/md126 | awk '{if ($2 ~ /part/) print $1}'

to
lsblk -I 3,8,9,179,259 -lpno KNAME,TYPE /dev/md126 | awk '{if ($2 ~ /md/) print $1}'

Allowed the system to image in debug mode. I doubt it will run because I don’t have the raid drivers in my pushed image, but imaging did complete fully without error.

[jpmartin]

@Sebastian-Roth said in Intel Raid0 Image Capture:

@jpmartin George’s mdadm -D /dev/md126 seems to be very handy and informative. Give that a try!

No image file found that would match the partitions to be restored
args passed /dev/md126 /images/WIN7ENTX64 all

Guess that’s just a matter of tuning the init scripts to make this work. Will have a look tomorrow. Marking this unread…

Here you go:

mdadm -D /dev/md126.txt

[jpmartin]

@george1421 Have you been able to capture an image from the machine?

Do you think it’d be possible to capture a Single Disk Resizable image from these fake raid machines?

[Tom Elliott]

I updated the source for this to allow for if ($2 ~ /part/ || $2 ~ /md/).

Hopefully this will work for you needs.

[george1421]

@Tom-Elliott That should do it very nicely!!

The OP will need to update to the latest release of the FOG trunk once the change has been pushed. I can confirm that it works. I still have my test rig set running.

As for “Do you think it’d be possible to capture a Single Disk Resizable image from these fake raid machines?”. I was able to deploy to this machine once I hacked the init (not needed now) so I also assume you should be able to capture resizeable. My deploy was a single disk resizeable image.

[Tom Elliott]

@george1421 I don’t know if it will “capture” unless the primary device is set though.

[george1421]

@Tom-Elliott Right. I know I have a wall of text in this one. But to use these fake raid systems you have to update the host registration with these settings. Without these set FOS will only see just a bunch of disks and not the array.

Host Kernel Arguments: mdraid=true
Host Primary Disk: /dev/md126

[edit] Corrected the extra bits in the host primary disk

[jpmartin]

@george1421 where does “Here” come from in “/dev/md126Here” in your post just below?

[Tom Elliott]

@jpmartin I think he was just typing. Ultimately, remove the “Here” as I highly doubt you all have a “/dev/md126Here” labeled device. :smiley_face_here:

As we don’t have smilies I suppose it would be better to add a bit that I’m just playing around.

[jpmartin]

@Tom-Elliott That’s what I was thinking too. But was just checking to make sure I didn’t miss anything.

Have the changes been pushed to the svn trunk so I can update and test?

[george1421]

@jpmartin said in Intel Raid0 Image Capture:

@george1421 where does “Here” come from in “/dev/md126Here” in your post just below?

Sorry trying to do my job and play at the same time, victim of copy/paste. Tom is right its just /dev/md126

[Tom Elliott]

Yes, changes have been pushed and init’s are updated. Reinstalling will work as well, but I still say to just update.

[jpmartin]

@Tom-Elliott Excellent. I’ll update and report back.