• Recent
    • Unsolved
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Cannot deploy (download) image in 1.2.0

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved
    FOG Problems
    3
    20
    4.9k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • N
      netman86
      last edited by

      Clarification: when I say I did my own factory install, I meant to say “Base” install- just a standard MS win7 disk.

      ubuntu 14.04
      fog 1.2.0

      image name was “BitSecSource”

      Wayne WorkmanW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Wayne WorkmanW
        Wayne Workman @netman86
        last edited by

        @netman86
        Post the output of this please:

        cd /images/BitSecSource/;ls -lahRt;cat d1.original.partitions;cat d1.minimum.partitions
        
        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • N
          netman86
          last edited by

          I don’t have any .partitions files in bitsecsource;
          only files in there are:
          d1.mbr
          d1p1.img
          d1p2.img
          d1p3.img
          d1p4.img
          d1p5.img

          Wayne WorkmanW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Wayne WorkmanW
            Wayne Workman @netman86
            last edited by

            @netman86

            ok, that’s fine… the command would have told me this…

            I’d still like to know the file sizes to look for potential issues.

            ls -lhaRt /images
            
            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • ?
              A Former User
              last edited by

              Could be completely wrong but I have ran into a problem that sounds similar to yours where it just skipped the imaging process for no reason. I finally figured out that apparently even though the drives showed the same size and both should be able to handle the same image, I had to shrink the partition size just a little so it was under the max size of the hard drive. Maybe give that a try?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • N
                netman86
                last edited by Wayne Workman

                I shrank partition 5 and re-imaged the machine, and now the target machine did run the restore- although partition 5 came up empty on the target machine (yet it IS formatted and has the correct label- curious!)

                As requested, here’s the paste from the console- note that bitsecsource was the image that wouldn’t deploy, and source2 is the one that worked minus partition5.

                /images/Source2:
                total 19G
                drwxrwxrwx 6 root root 4.0K Jul  9 16:37 ..
                -rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7.5G Jul  9 16:37 d1p5.img
                drwxrwxrwx 2 root root 4.0K Jul  9 16:01 .
                -rwxrwxrwx 1 root root  296 Jul  9 16:01 d1p4.img
                -rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 152M Jul  9 16:01 d1p3.img
                -rwxrwxrwx 1 root root  11G Jul  9 15:59 d1p2.img
                -rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 8.2M Jul  9 15:07 d1p1.img
                -rwxrwxrwx 1 root root  512 Jul  9 15:07 d1.mbr
                
                /images/BitSecSource:
                total 18G
                drwxrwxrwx 6 root root 4.0K Jul  9 16:37 ..
                -rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7.5G Jul  9 12:31 d1p5.img
                drwxrwxrwx 2 root root 4.0K Jul  9 11:54 .
                -rwxrwxrwx 1 root root  295 Jul  9 11:53 d1p4.img
                -rwxrwxrwx 1 root root  69M Jul  9 11:53 d1p3.img
                -rwxrwxrwx 1 root root  11G Jul  9 11:52 d1p2.img
                -rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 8.2M Jul  9 11:01 d1p1.img
                -rwxrwxrwx 1 root root  512 Jul  9 11:01 d1.mbr
                

                Mod edited to use code boxes.

                Wayne WorkmanW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Wayne WorkmanW
                  Wayne Workman @netman86
                  last edited by

                  @netman86 Would you consider upgrading to FOG Trunk? Your issue might be resolved by this alone.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • N
                    netman86
                    last edited by

                    I can’t say I’ve got a compelling reason not to, assuming it’s a fairly pain free process and the TRUNK version is considered fairly stable.

                    This FOG machine was built just for this job (I’ve always wanted to try it out) so I don’t have too much to lose if it goes awry.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • N
                      netman86
                      last edited by

                      Since I see the d1p5 has data in the image, I’m going to upgrade to trunk and try to re-deploy to another laptop- assuming it lets me deploy an image made with 1.2.0

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • N
                        netman86
                        last edited by

                        So after spending a few hours fixing everything after attempting to upgrade to trunk, I’m running trunk.

                        I tried to deploy the same image to another laptop and had the same issue I had in 1.2.0.

                        I then tried to create a NEW image from the source, and that appeared to go fine- but it overwrote my old source instead of creating a new one as I had specified (Odd issues with changing options in host management not sticking)

                        For whatever reason, the image didn’t work. It went through and did a partition copy, and wrote new files to /images/source2, but under image management that source shows up as 0.00B when it’s about 50G on disk.

                        I went and changed it to source3 again and created an upload job, which failed- I had to manually create a Source3 directory in /images/ for it to start the process, which tells me that maybe something is screwy with permissions for /images- but everything appears to be 777 so I can’t fathom what it could be.

                        Creating a new source3 image now just to see what happens…

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • N
                          netman86
                          last edited by

                          New image appears to have created correctly, and shows up in image from the web UI with a size- but the restore back to another box had the same results.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • N
                            netman86
                            last edited by

                            update:

                            after the failed deployment, the size listed under image management changed to 0.00iB. Odd.

                            Wayne WorkmanW 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • Wayne WorkmanW
                              Wayne Workman @netman86
                              last edited by

                              This post is deleted!
                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • Wayne WorkmanW
                                Wayne Workman @netman86
                                last edited by Wayne Workman

                                @netman86 said:

                                update:

                                after the failed deployment, the size listed under image management changed to 0.00iB. Odd.

                                That’s a minor bug that is non-impacting. I have a few images that list as 0 in size on client, but they work just fine.

                                Why do you have 5 partitions?

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • N
                                  netman86
                                  last edited by

                                  1. the windows 100mb boot partition
                                  2. C drive
                                  3. D drive (required for this purpose)
                                  4. extended for 5
                                  5. backup partition with image of C for on the road re-imaging (also required…)

                                  I might be able to get away with keeping the image on partition 3 as a file, but TPTB want it on its own partition.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • N
                                    netman86
                                    last edited by

                                    I just spoke to the guy wanting these and the requirement has changed- I also need a small (100mb) partition for the lab, so that’ll be six partitions in all.
                                    I’m testing a RAW image clone right now, I can’t think of a reason it wouldn’t work if FOG manages to initiate the copy on the destination…

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • 1 / 1
                                    • First post
                                      Last post

                                    142

                                    Online

                                    12.1k

                                    Users

                                    17.3k

                                    Topics

                                    155.4k

                                    Posts
                                    Copyright © 2012-2024 FOG Project