• Recent
    • Unsolved
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    SVN 3530 Download Issue (Partimage)

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved
    FOG Problems
    4
    10
    2.8k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • D
      dustindizzle11
      last edited by dustindizzle11

      Quick question when anyone has time. I upgraded my fog unit to SVN 3530 from 1.2, and I noticed now after downloading an image, after it gets to about 5% the progress screen gets all wacked out and the imaging doesn’t finish. Below is a picture of the normal screen along with the screen it changes to at about 5%. I appreciate any help, Thanks!

      photo 1.JPG photo 2.JPG

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Tom ElliottT
        Tom Elliott
        last edited by

        The colors aren’t as strange but does this happen on every system or just that particular one.

        Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG! Get in contact with me (chat bubble in the top right corner) if you want to join in.

        Web GUI issue? Please check apache error (debian/ubuntu: /var/log/apache2/error.log, centos/fedora/rhel: /var/log/httpd/error_log) and php-fpm log (/var/log/php*-fpm.log)

        Please support FOG if you like it: https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/Support_FOG

        D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • D
          dustindizzle11
          last edited by

          Hi Tom,
          Thanks for your quick response and sorry about the late reply. I will get back to you on the imaging issue here soon. I put the old .31 server back in place just for the time being because Apache keeps having issues. Computers in the network are unable to boot to PXE, so I just swapped the server for the time being. This has happened for a few days in a row now. I would get apache working, but it would eventually fail (I would come into work in the morning and computers would be having issues starting up because they were not able to PXE boot). I would get errors similar to the ones below.

          [Mon Jun 08 10:37:42 2015] [error] [client 192.168.69.85] PHP Warning: mysqli::mysqli(): (HY000/2002): Can’t connect to local MySQL server through socket '/var/run/mysq$
          [Mon Jun 08 10:37:42 2015] [error] [client 192.168.69.85] PHP Warning: mysqli::select_db(): Couldn’t fetch mysqli in /var/www/fog/lib/db/MySQL.class.php on line 165
          [Mon Jun 08 10:37:42 2015] [error] [client 192.168.69.85] PHP Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn’t fetch mysqli in /var/www/fog/lib/db/MySQL.class.php on line 89
          [Mon Jun 08 10:37:42 2015] [error] [client 192.168.69.85] PHP Warning: MySQL::sqlerror(): Couldn’t fetch mysqli in /var/www/fog/lib/db/MySQL.class.php on line 180
          [Mon Jun 08 10:37:42 2015] [error] [client 192.168.69.85] PHP Warning: array_key_exists() expects parameter 2 to be array, null given in /var/www/fog/lib/db/MySQL.class$
          [Mon Jun 08 10:37:42 2015] [error] [client 192.168.77.50] PHP Warning: mysqli::mysqli(): (HY000/2002): Can’t connect to local MySQL server through socket '/var/run/mysq$
          [Mon Jun 08 10:37:42 2015] [error] [client 192.168.77.50] PHP Warning: mysqli::select_db(): Couldn’t fetch mysqli in /var/www/fog/lib/db/MySQL.class.php on line 165

          Regarding the imaging issue, I just hooked up the SVN 3530 server in a separate network where I can troubleshoot apache and the imaging screen mentioned in the post. Apache seems to be working again. I will test a few different models to see if it’s just this one model that has that weird screen.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • D
            dustindizzle11 @Tom Elliott
            last edited by

            @Tom-Elliott

            Just tested another model and got the same results.

            Tom ElliottT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Tom ElliottT
              Tom Elliott @dustindizzle11
              last edited by

              @dustindizzle11 are they exactly the same?

              Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG! Get in contact with me (chat bubble in the top right corner) if you want to join in.

              Web GUI issue? Please check apache error (debian/ubuntu: /var/log/apache2/error.log, centos/fedora/rhel: /var/log/httpd/error_log) and php-fpm log (/var/log/php*-fpm.log)

              Please support FOG if you like it: https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/Support_FOG

              D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • D
                dustindizzle11 @Tom Elliott
                last edited by

                @Tom-Elliott
                It’s the same type of image. Some of the text looks different in spots.photo.JPG

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • C
                  crosser
                  last edited by crosser

                  So as some of you know, I’ve had some issues with FOG lately that I’ve mostly resolved by reformatting my Ubuntu FOG server and by reinstalling everything fresh. With that being said, I am now able to successfully upload and deploy new images to my FOG server.

                  BUT, I too, have this exact same issue reported on this thread on SVN 3537. It seems to ‘only’ occur with these legacy image settings:
                  Image Type: Single Disk - Resizable
                  Image Manager: PartImage

                  PS: We still use the settings listed above for some legacy XP machines that were imaged that way. All other legacy “PartImage” images that are “Multi-partition - Single Disk” work just fine.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Wayne WorkmanW
                    Wayne Workman
                    last edited by

                    Is it at all possible to build a .32 fog server on some old desktop machine and quickly deploy these old images to the relevant hardware, and then upload those freshly imaged machines to a partclone image on the new FOG server???

                    Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!
                    Daily Clean Installation Results:
                    https://fogtesting.fogproject.us/
                    FOG Reporting:
                    https://fog-external-reporting-results.fogproject.us/

                    C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • C
                      crosser @Wayne Workman
                      last edited by

                      @Wayne-Workman

                      Possible? Yes. Practical? Not really, since we have quite a few legacy models.

                      What I think I might do though is leave our old FOG 0.32 server running in case we need to use it for these specific legacy images.

                      Thanks again to everyone on the FOG team for all of the development and support you all do!

                      Wayne WorkmanW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Wayne WorkmanW
                        Wayne Workman @crosser
                        last edited by

                        @crosser said:

                        @Wayne-Workman

                        Possible? Yes. Practical? Not really, since we have quite a few legacy models.

                        What I think I might do though is leave our old FOG 0.32 server running in case we need to use it for these specific legacy images.

                        Thanks again to everyone on the FOG team for all of the development and support you all do!

                        That’s a good choice. Sorry we couldn’t help more, but this issue is pretty bizarre.

                        Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!
                        Daily Clean Installation Results:
                        https://fogtesting.fogproject.us/
                        FOG Reporting:
                        https://fog-external-reporting-results.fogproject.us/

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • 1 / 1
                        • First post
                          Last post

                        211

                        Online

                        12.0k

                        Users

                        17.3k

                        Topics

                        155.2k

                        Posts
                        Copyright © 2012-2024 FOG Project