2MB Transfer over GBE | Fog 1.2.0

[Seth Earby]

I just changed it over to an HP with 2 NIC’s to test and I’m still getting 2MB transfers. So it’s a fog configuration.

Here is my Advanced Boot Menu:

[CODE]set boot-url http://${fog-ip}/${fog-webroot}
:MENU
menu
item --gap – Imaging and Diagnostics
item QDX QDX Diagnostic
item HIR Hirens 15.2 DvD
item Untangle Untangle 11
item hostinfo Host Information (Your Machine Info)
choose target && goto ${target}

:QDX
initrd http://${fog-ip}/iso/qdx.iso
chain memdisk iso raw ||
echo failed to boot
prompt
goto MENU

:HIR
initrd http://${fog-ip}/iso/hirens15.iso
chain memdisk iso raw ||
echo failed to boot
prompt
goto MENU

:Untangle
initrd http://${fog-ip}/iso/untangle.iso
chain memdisk iso raw ||
echo failed to boot
prompt
goto MENU

:hostinfo
echo This computer : ||
echo MAC address…${net0/mac} ||
echo IP address…${ip} ||
echo Netmask…${netmask} ||
echo Serial…${serial} ||
echo Asset number…${asset} ||
echo Manufacturer…${manufacturer} ||
echo Product…${product} ||
echo BIOS platform…${platform} ||
echo ||
echo press any key to return to Menu ||
prompt
goto MENU[/CODE]

[Tom Elliott]

If it was a “fog configuration” issue,

Then nearly everybody using fog would be experiencing the exact same problem.

[Seth Earby]

I figured it was something that I may have put in wrong. However, I’m downloading the iso over httpd. It’s a steady 2MB. However, the speeds are much faster if I browse Ip/iso/image.iso and download that. Is there an alternative way I could write my file to do tftp or something else?

Thanks.

[Seth Earby]

How does the http .iso download work? Does it download then mount it or is it try to unpack the .iso on the server?

[Tom Elliott]

it tries to store the iso into ram on the client.

[Seth Earby]

So IO shouldn’t be a problem. The client in question has an i3 with 8GB of RAM. Do you have to do custom iso’s over HTTP or can you pull them from TFTP?

[Junkhacker]

when loading an ISO into ram, the transfer method to get it there is irrelevant, as long as it gets there

[Seth Earby]

Well, I’m trying to see what could be the issue. It shouldn’t be 2MB slow. Even on at 10/100 connection. I’m trying to see if another retrieval method would be faster.

[Seth Earby]

Out of curiosity, could 2 NIC’s have anything to do with it?

[Tom Elliott]

One of the reasons to go http over tftp is the speed.

TFTP has this problem of limiting down to 10MB per second transfer, where HTTP can achieve, potentially, full throughput on the NIC.

Yes, 2 NICs could potentially cause issues though I don’t know how or what the issue is.

[Seth Earby]

I have it running out off of the onboard NIC (Intel Controller) and it’s still 2MB. Is there anything I could paste to provide better information? I’m really stuck to why this is happening.

[Tom Elliott]

Is it bridged or host-only?

[Seth Earby]

[quote=“Tom Elliott, post: 37978, member: 7271”]Is it bridged or host-only?[/quote]

It is host only.

[Tom Elliott]

Can you attempt putting it into Bridged mode.

Host-only, as I understand it, makes the device as if it’s going through the host machine. This sound’s like it’d be a good thing, except the VM still has to process the information as if it is its own device. So, when you choose Host-Only, the device suddenly becomes processed by two CPU’s.

It’s just a theory and one that I think deserves a good ol’ college try!

Change out of host-only to Bridged NIC and maybe things will work better?