• Recent
    • Unsolved
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Intel NUC iPXE stuck

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Hardware Compatibility
    5
    28
    14.5k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • K
      KOA-IT
      last edited by

      I tried kernel version 3.8.8 and still get “no partitions found” after being presented with a screen displaying at a higher resolution with text.

      [ATTACH]1347[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]1348[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]1349[/ATTACH]

      Thanks for your response, but the original issue remains. I’m sure more people will start using these NUC’s as they are very cost effective and are perfect for educational establishments and will probably encounter our issues if using FOG… It’s a great solution for everything else we have but these NUC’s are troublemakers!

      [url=“/_imported_xf_attachments/1/1346_IMG_1117.JPG?:”]IMG_1117.JPG[/url][url=“/_imported_xf_attachments/1/1347_IMG_1118.JPG?:”]IMG_1118.JPG[/url][url=“/_imported_xf_attachments/1/1348_IMG_1119.JPG?:”]IMG_1119.JPG[/url][url=“/_imported_xf_attachments/1/1349_IMG_1120.JPG?:”]IMG_1120.JPG[/url]

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Tom ElliottT
        Tom Elliott
        last edited by

        Can you try a later version of fog? Possibly get into Debug mode as well?

        Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG! Get in contact with me (chat bubble in the top right corner) if you want to join in.

        Web GUI issue? Please check apache error (debian/ubuntu: /var/log/apache2/error.log, centos/fedora/rhel: /var/log/httpd/error_log) and php-fpm log (/var/log/php*-fpm.log)

        Please support FOG if you like it: https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/Support_FOG

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • K
          KOA-IT
          last edited by

          Hi,

          I have now upgraded to version 1.2.0 and the Intel NUC hangs on this screen… on the older version it continued past this but displayed an error. This is with kernel version 3.14.2 x86 - I can see it says i8042 no controller found on a previous screen and maybe that has something to do with it?

          The NUC is using a 120GB Crucial SSD in the mSATA slot.

          [ATTACH]1350[/ATTACH]

          –
          We are also having issues with this version joining our domain. The error in the log i’ve checked is ‘Unknown Error: Code 87’ on a different machine that previously worked.

          Thanks for your time, I hope the information provided helps…

          [url=“/_imported_xf_attachments/1/1350_IMG_1121.JPG?:”]IMG_1121.JPG[/url]

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Tom ElliottT
            Tom Elliott
            last edited by

            At this screen.

            Can you attempt to put the system into upload - debug. At the command prompt that comes up, type fixparts and confirm the changes.

            Then run the command fog.

            Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG! Get in contact with me (chat bubble in the top right corner) if you want to join in.

            Web GUI issue? Please check apache error (debian/ubuntu: /var/log/apache2/error.log, centos/fedora/rhel: /var/log/httpd/error_log) and php-fpm log (/var/log/php*-fpm.log)

            Please support FOG if you like it: https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/Support_FOG

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • K
              KOA-IT
              last edited by

              Hi,

              I’ve ran fixparts and it complained that partitions were dodgy on dev/sda1 - it didn’t fix this.

              Partitions #1 #2 #3 #4 were apparently too large which the tool then said it had deleted three times but the same warning cropped up. I ignored this in the end and tried to re-upload the image after doing fixparts and I am now getting a completely different error which i’m still at a loss on how to solve.

              If i push return it then says task complete but I don’t think it actually does complete it as the web interface says no data still. These NUC’s are little troublemakers!

              [ATTACH]1351[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]1352[/ATTACH]

              Again, thanks for your time with this issue.

              [url=“/_imported_xf_attachments/1/1351_IMG_1157.JPG?:”]IMG_1157.JPG[/url][url=“/_imported_xf_attachments/1/1352_IMG_1158.JPG?:”]IMG_1158.JPG[/url]

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Tom ElliottT
                Tom Elliott
                last edited by

                if you reuploaded AFTER doing fixparts you shouldn’t be seeing anything about GPT headers and the like, unless you’re really trying to run a GPT partitioned layout?

                Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG! Get in contact with me (chat bubble in the top right corner) if you want to join in.

                Web GUI issue? Please check apache error (debian/ubuntu: /var/log/apache2/error.log, centos/fedora/rhel: /var/log/httpd/error_log) and php-fpm log (/var/log/php*-fpm.log)

                Please support FOG if you like it: https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/Support_FOG

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • K
                  KOA-IT
                  last edited by

                  I just attempted fixparts again in Upload Debug mode… here’s the images I grabbed. It complained about the partitions which is fine as it’s supposed to solve that? Then I wrote the changes and proceeded to start the fog upload.

                  [ATTACH]1353[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]1354[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]1355[/ATTACH]

                  [url=“/_imported_xf_attachments/1/1353_IMG_1160.JPG?:”]IMG_1160.JPG[/url][url=“/_imported_xf_attachments/1/1354_IMG_1161.JPG?:”]IMG_1161.JPG[/url][url=“/_imported_xf_attachments/1/1355_IMG_1162.JPG?:”]IMG_1162.JPG[/url]

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Tom ElliottT
                    Tom Elliott
                    last edited by

                    Is this drive, perhaps, an SSD?

                    Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG! Get in contact with me (chat bubble in the top right corner) if you want to join in.

                    Web GUI issue? Please check apache error (debian/ubuntu: /var/log/apache2/error.log, centos/fedora/rhel: /var/log/httpd/error_log) and php-fpm log (/var/log/php*-fpm.log)

                    Please support FOG if you like it: https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/Support_FOG

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • K
                      KOA-IT
                      last edited by

                      Yep it is a Crucial 120GB SSD in the mSATA slot which is what I think was causing the issues regarding communicating to it, but wanted to know if there was a fix. I did mention it in previous posts but it may have been overlooked… Sorry for not making the hardware setup clearer.

                      I appreciate your very timely responses with the issues I’m experiencing, and hope we can come to a resolution so we can roll out some NUC’s to our Library as the testing ground. =]

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • K
                        KOA-IT
                        last edited by

                        Hi,

                        Sorry to bother you guys again…

                        I would like to know if this is a Kernel issue regarding the use of SSD’s or would you know if there is anything else I can do to get the NUC’s working?

                        Thanks for your help in solving these niggly issues so far, you’ve been very helpful 🙂

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • JunkhackerJ
                          Junkhacker Developer
                          last edited by

                          i have used many ssd’s without issue and am unaware of any known issues with SSD’s, but a few people are reporting issues with the NUC systems. unfortunately, i don’t think any of the developers have access to a NUC themselves, so troubleshooting is tricky

                          signature:
                          Junkhacker
                          We are here to help you. If you are unresponsive to our questions, don't expect us to be responsive to yours.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • S
                            Sodden
                            last edited by

                            I don’t think it’s SSD related. We’ve been using the same SSD’s in the NUC’s with manufacturing data 01/2014 and those work with fog. Only those with manufacturing data 05/2014 are having troubles. Intel switched mainboards, 05/14 only accepts 1.35V RAM while 01/14 accepts 1.5V. The NIC is differnt too, and probably the SATA controller.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • S
                              Sodden
                              last edited by

                              After having another go at this with the latest svn build, I finally solved the problem. Or at least I hope I did.

                              I had the same problem as before with the latest svn release. I changed between different .kpxe and .kkpxe files countless times until I tried something I hadn’t done before. I always used symlink’s to switch between .kpxe and .kkpxe files, but instead of doing that I decided to change Option 67 in the DHCP settings for a change. And it worked!

                              I’ll try a different client later to see if it really is the fix I’ve been looking for.

                              Edit: Doesn’t seem to solve the Problem. But I found a workaround. Booting any OS (Live CD is enough) and rebooting solves the problem. I guess it has something to do with the NIC not being shut-down correctly by the manufacturer.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • 1
                              • 2
                              • 2 / 2
                              • First post
                                Last post

                              180

                              Online

                              12.0k

                              Users

                              17.3k

                              Topics

                              155.2k

                              Posts
                              Copyright © 2012-2024 FOG Project