• Recent
    • Unsolved
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Imaging issues after updating from 0.32 to 1.1.2

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    FOG Problems
    4
    11
    3.2k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • U
      undead_rattler
      last edited by

      I updated, and everything worked out of the box, except actually writing the image to the host.
      I searched everywhere to get an actual text copy of the error, but seeing as it occurs on the client, I couldn’t get one for you 🙂

      Server: openvz squeeze with unfs3 instead of nfs-kernel. worked perfectly fine with .32; backup available if needed, and I might have to spin it back up if I can’t figure this out.

      client: dell optiplex gx520 - no frill, just a HDD, tested to be working before upgrade

      [url]http://imgur.com/doIXejR[/url] < link to the actual error message. Transcripted as follows:

      [CODE]/usr/share/fog/lib/funcs.sh: line 84: 2522 Aborted partimage restore $2 $1 -f3 -b 2> /tmp/status.fog

      • Backing up and replacing BCD…mv: cannot stat ‘/bcdstore/Boot/BCD’: No such file or directory
        umount: can’t umount /bcdstore: Invalid argument
        Done
      • Resizing ntfs volume (/dev/sda1)…Done
      • Clearing ntfs flag…Done
      • Changing Hostname…Done
      • Updating Computer Database Status[/CODE]

      short of unpacking the boot image and reading the script, it appears to be an un-fixable bug.
      help?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • JunkhackerJ
        Junkhacker Developer
        last edited by

        what was your procedure for updating? did you upgrade on a running 0.32 computer, or did you migrate your data to a new install?

        signature:
        Junkhacker
        We are here to help you. If you are unresponsive to our questions, don't expect us to be responsive to yours.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Tom ElliottT
          Tom Elliott
          last edited by

          I’m aware of an issue with partimage, and am trying to figure out the cause. Hopefully will have fix soon.

          Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG! Get in contact with me (chat bubble in the top right corner) if you want to join in.

          Web GUI issue? Please check apache error (debian/ubuntu: /var/log/apache2/error.log, centos/fedora/rhel: /var/log/httpd/error_log) and php-fpm log (/var/log/php*-fpm.log)

          Please support FOG if you like it: https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/Support_FOG

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • U
            undead_rattler
            last edited by

            Junkhacker: in-place upgrade from 0.32 to 1.1.2.

            Tom Elliot: weird question, but why did we move away from pxelinux.0 to undionly.kpxe? It definitely seems to take longer, and feels like an extra unnecessary step. Is there a large change in the menu system?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • JunkhackerJ
              Junkhacker Developer
              last edited by

              everything about ipxe is faster then pxelinux.0, so far as i know. what is going slower? and yes, there has been a massive change in the menu system.

              signature:
              Junkhacker
              We are here to help you. If you are unresponsive to our questions, don't expect us to be responsive to yours.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • U
                undead_rattler
                last edited by

                it just feels longer, watching the pxe load up, then having to wait for ipxe to ‘initalize devices’. It could just be the client device I’m using too. And, upon further reading elsewhere in the forums, I have also realized that it’s just future-proofing for uefi (which is also a stupid technology, but that’s besides the point 🙂

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Tom ElliottT
                  Tom Elliott
                  last edited by

                  This issue should be fixed in SVN. Please give it a shot. At the least you can just try the init:

                  [code]wget https://svn.code.sf.net/p/freeghost/code/trunk/packages/web/service/ipxe/init.xz -O /var/www/fog/service/ipxe/init.xz
                  wget https://svn.code.sf.net/p/freeghost/code/trunk/packages/web/service/ipxe/init_32.xz -O /var/www/fog/service/ipxe/init_32.xz[/code]

                  Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG! Get in contact with me (chat bubble in the top right corner) if you want to join in.

                  Web GUI issue? Please check apache error (debian/ubuntu: /var/log/apache2/error.log, centos/fedora/rhel: /var/log/httpd/error_log) and php-fpm log (/var/log/php*-fpm.log)

                  Please support FOG if you like it: https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/Support_FOG

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • U
                    undead_rattler
                    last edited by

                    Tom, after updating the initrd and booting, it still errors out - it goes by so fast and then restarts, I don’t have time to read the error messages. In my attempt to find a debug system I booted the compatibility menu entry and got a kernel panic. I might just spin back up my 0.32 and re-upload all the images to a new 1.1.2 box. I can hold off on that for about another week, if you’d like to continue troubleshooting.

                    also, is the advanced menu menu entry syntax different? I tried to load the advanced menu to see if the debug option was there, but it just cycles back to the basic menu, and restarts the timer.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • JunkhackerJ
                      Junkhacker Developer
                      last edited by

                      the advanced menu is ipxe menu format
                      [url]http://fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/Advanced_Boot_Menu_Configuration_options[/url]

                      signature:
                      Junkhacker
                      We are here to help you. If you are unresponsive to our questions, don't expect us to be responsive to yours.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • C
                        cr31
                        last edited by

                        Was this a New HDD?
                        I came accross this when we purchased a pallet full of refurbished machines, and got the same message…because the HD wasn’t initialised.
                        I removed the drive, put it into an external caddy, used disk management to initialise the disk, put disk back into PC, re-tried with Fog, and it worked!
                        Alternatively you can use Diskpart or similar

                        i may be off the mark here, but just check

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • U
                          undead_rattler
                          last edited by

                          [quote=“cr31, post: 33511, member: 25150”]Was this a New HDD?
                          I came accross this when we purchased a pallet full of refurbished machines, and got the same message…because the HD wasn’t initialised.
                          I removed the drive, put it into an external caddy, used disk management to initialise the disk, put disk back into PC, re-tried with Fog, and it worked!
                          Alternatively you can use Diskpart or similar

                          i may be off the mark here, but just check[/quote]

                          it is definitely initialized - it’s currently got XP on it. Also, it imaged fine with the 0.32 fog server when I spun it back up. The issue is somewhere in the update, unfortunately 😕

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • 1 / 1
                          • First post
                            Last post

                          196

                          Online

                          12.0k

                          Users

                          17.3k

                          Topics

                          155.2k

                          Posts
                          Copyright © 2012-2024 FOG Project