• Recent
  • Unsolved
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • Recent
  • Unsolved
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

PXE Boot issue on second FOG-Server

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved
FOG Problems
2
2
272
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • E
    El-Fogito
    last edited by Nov 24, 2023, 3:19 PM

    This post is deleted!
    G 1 Reply Last reply Nov 24, 2023, 3:37 PM Reply Quote 0
    • G
      george1421 Moderator @El-Fogito
      last edited by Nov 24, 2023, 3:37 PM

      @El-Fogito said in PXE Boot issue on second FOG-Server:

      VLAN 10.20.88.0 and 10.20.82.0 (on which I configured port 66/67 from DHCP to server 10.20.10.38) finds NOTHING.

      The first question is that is 10.20.88.0 fully routable to 10.20.10.38? i.e. can you ping 10.20.10.38 from the 10.20.88.0 subnet?

      Do have any firewalls or screening routers that might stop udp port 67 and 68 from reaching 10.20.10.38? You can test this by using a computer on the remote subnet and trying to tftp one of the boot files from the fog server.

      You are saying that you can change dhcp option 66 from 10.10.10.38 to 10.20.10.38 and the remote system can’t pxe boot. This eliminates dhcp server and possibly any router dhcp helper/relay settings from the problem.

      If you have a witness computer (third computer on the remote subnet running wireshark) on the 10.20.88.0 you might setup a pcap to see what the remote pxe booting computers are being told what to load. This would ensure that the remote pxe booting computer was being told the proper values. If true then you can eliminate dhcp infrastructure issues and then deal with IP routing as the problem.

      Is there any WAN links between 10.20.10.38 and 10.20.88.0/24 subnets? I have see WAN links that have a smaller MTU than the tftp block size cause a problem. I think the default block size for tftp is 1468 so if the link MTU is below that value it will case the tftp packet to fragment and then fail to download. From your error message it doesn’t sound like this is the issue, but its always good to ask.

      Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • 1 / 1
      1 / 1
      • First post
        1/2
        Last post

      211

      Online

      12.0k

      Users

      17.3k

      Topics

      155.2k

      Posts
      Copyright © 2012-2024 FOG Project