• Recent
    • Unsolved
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    "No configuration method succeeded" but autoboot works

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    FOG Problems
    2
    4
    421
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • F
      f-15s-mtd
      last edited by

      Hi everyone, no sure if this if this is an ipxe issue or a FOG issue: I am attempting to boot into FOG using ipxe.

      The computer netboots, pulls the ipxe image, and then is supposed to boot into FOG, but it fails with “No configuration methods succeeded” and the 040ee119 error. ifstat shows closed. However, if I use the dhcp command, it returns “ok” and then ifstat returns open. From here, running autoboot boots into FOG as expected.

      So my question is, why doesn’t this happen automatically?

      Placing a dumb switch in between the computer and the network stack, makes the netboot go automatically. I have read that disabling EEE on the switch (Cisco 2690S) can fix this, but the switch does not support EEE.

      I am out of my element as far as networking goes, so I am unsure how to troubleshoot.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • george1421G
        george1421 Moderator
        last edited by

        ok since you tested with a cheap/dumb/unmanaged switch and it works, then the problem is most likely that you have standard spanning tree enabled on your network switch. You need to change the configuration so you are using one of the fast spanning tree protocols (port-fast, FastSTP, RSTP, MSTP, or what ever your switch manufacturer calls it).

        Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • F
          f-15s-mtd
          last edited by

          Awesome, changing protocols is actually on the big to-do list anyway.

          For the sake of testing, would I only need to change the switches in the route, or would every switch need to be changed (it’s a good size network)?

          Thank you!

          george1421G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • george1421G
            george1421 Moderator @f-15s-mtd
            last edited by george1421

            @f-15s-mtd You will need to change every switch/port that has a device that you want to pxe boot on. This is an access layer issue not something related to the FOG server or switch to switch communication. The problem is in the “last mile” so to speak.

            ref: https://community.cisco.com/t5/other-network-architecture/enable-portfast-on-all-ports/td-p/324511 read down the post because there are switch global commands that you can use.

            Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • 1 / 1
            • First post
              Last post

            137

            Online

            12.1k

            Users

            17.3k

            Topics

            155.4k

            Posts
            Copyright © 2012-2024 FOG Project