Dell 7730 precision laptop deploy GPT error message

[Sebastian Roth]

@jmason Hmmmm, thanks for the heads up! Not sure what is going on there but I am fairly sure the init_nvme.xz file on our webserver has not changed since I posted the link last. It’s only Tom and me having access at the moment and I don’t think he’s done anything to it. To me this sounds more like there is still an issue within the scripts that only appears in certain situations. Will try to find it on the weekend.

[jmason]

@Sebastian-Roth Was looking in the images directory here is the contents of the d1.original.uuids file

/dev/nvme0n1 c0c5d1ae-844a-476e-81c6-7df5e3996ef1
 1:d8b3acfb-02fa-4da3-9eee-b42d59256a4f
/dev/nvme0n1p2 2:2607-0C5E 2:ee3b91d5-4673-4e49-9011-7d3e10182cbe
/dev/nvme0n1p3 3:bc88509e-b6ed-49c0-9106-dc7976a67b2a 3:9e96fd40-79f2-4d79-b2e7-574ddd2b5ce6
/dev/nvme0n1p4 4:HtWBPV-9Aom-jBpz-4pyv-qy3A-lf2o-x58axC 4:fea80442-d73a-494d-be20-1aeee1f51158

vs d2.original.uuids files

/dev/nvme1n1 5c273d41-1202-4874-8a69-9af1285c6d77
/dev/nvme1n1p1 1:DEFC-1910 1:2b0507fe-9371-463b-832d-63c3aa24795e
 2:9667e751-1aee-4f09-b9cc-8e1c16b3010b
/dev/nvme1n1p3 3:382631A826316850 3:3adca3cc-702f-4084-9f16-3b8f241cf81e
/dev/nvme1n1p4 4:2C0C9D570C9D1D40 4:e12d4c98-026a-406c-8043-0498c66be933

Not sure if this is helpful in any way but it looked slightly odd missing /dev/nvme0n1p1 and /dev/nvme1n1p2, but may just be some debug info file you are using. Anyway thanks for all your work on this and I’ll keep checking in.

[Sebastian Roth]

@jmason Ok, I had a closer look at the UUID stuff and turns out that we had a general bug there as well as unneeded code. I did a bit of a cleanup while hopefully fixing the problem you saw with dual NVMe disk machines.

Can you please test the current init.xz ( as well 32 bit if you need that) our build server spit out.

Be aware that I removed the need for dX.original.uuids altogether as we have all the information in other files available already. So when you upload the image again (which you don’t have to for the simple deploy test to see if the UUID stuff is fixed!) you won’t have dX.original.uuids files anymore.

[jmason]

@Sebastian-Roth We are in the middle of an office move, I will test and respond as soon as I have everything set back up. Hopefully before the end of the week.

[jmason]

@Sebastian-Roth I was finally able to get everything set back up in the new office location. I downloaded and replaced the init.xz and the UUIDs appeared as expected when I performed a deploy from my original image.

I believe this may be finally solved. I can test more things if you need and somewhat faster now that I’m set back up again.

I can’t express my thanks enough! Kudos!!

[jmason]

This post is deleted!

[jmason]

@Sebastian-Roth
Well I am watching the systems more closely now started up some new ones, perhaps its just much slower than what I expected with 10 hooked up vs the 2 I was testing with for a few months.

Potential BIG problem with hopefully an easy fix. I finally have a big training laptop update so captured my main image from the laptop again, and then hooked up 10 laptops to the switch to deploy as I have been doing… For some reason, when the deploy is complete it RESTARTS deploying all over again. I haven’t updated anything as far as OS or fog, all I did was create a BRAND new image to deploy. I thought it was taking an awful long time for them to complete when I watched one hit the end of the deploy cycle announce clone complete display the uuids and then start over with the first drive again.

It appears to only repeat the deploy process one more time and then shut down as expected.

[Sebastian Roth]

@jmason May I ask you to pay very close attention to the partition names you see in the output. Possibly best if you schedule a debug deploy job and whenever you get to a blue partclone screen please note down the partition like sda1 or so and as well the filesystem (NTFS I suppose).

Let us know if it really goes through sda1, sda2, sda3 and starts over with sda1 again. Can’t really imagine it is doing this.

[jmason]

@Sebastian-Roth It only did the process once, I just semi panicked due to it being slower than when I was only running 1 at a time vs 10, and the pesky nvme drives starting and ending with different drives in the multi nvme drive system.

Weird that some of the laptops finish in the expected time about 45min was the avg, but I have some sitting at over 2hours on just one partition…and a few the elapsed time is frozen now.

After turning off and restarting a few of the laptops the others that appeared frozen started going again.

[Sebastian Roth]

@jmason So do I get this right. Any more issues?

[jmason]

@Sebastian-Roth I’m working on attempting to image just one of the disks by specifying the primary host disk field to see if the /dev/nvme0n1 and /dev/nvme1n2 map correctly to the physical disk for this process. I’m thinking there may be an issue, but I can open another thread for that.

[Sebastian Roth]

@jmason Yeah, better open a new one.

[jmason]

@Sebastian-Roth I am now, as what I expected is the case.