• Recent
    • Unsolved
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Dell Precision Tower 5820 - FlexBay MiniSAS PCIe NVMe SSD not recognized

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Hardware Compatibility
    9
    124
    49.2k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Tom ElliottT
      Tom Elliott @george1421
      last edited by Tom Elliott

      @george1421 On the wiki page, that’s the storvsc portion of the additional patches.

      For understanding,

      If the page size is 4096, it’s supposed to do stuff. However, not all disks use a 4096 page size. This is noticed particularly when initializing/erasing mbr/gpt structures on a disk. It’s just strange, to me, that it only seems to be impacting Windows based installs. At least from what I’ve seen.

      Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG! Get in contact with me (chat bubble in the top right corner) if you want to join in.

      Web GUI issue? Please check apache error (debian/ubuntu: /var/log/apache2/error.log, centos/fedora/rhel: /var/log/httpd/error_log) and php-fpm log (/var/log/php*-fpm.log)

      Please support FOG if you like it: https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/Support_FOG

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • george1421G
        george1421 Moderator @Sebastian Roth
        last edited by

        @sebastian-roth The kernel patch and diffs you found for 4.13 have been integrated into the mainstream code. I confirmed they were there in 4.17.13

        I’m going to rebuild with that config parameter you mentioned form that Arch post. I also integrated the patches from the FOG Wiki site. For now I think I’m going to stick with 4.17.13 for developing the kernel, I have a rule to never install a XX.0 release of anything (thank you Bill Gates).

        Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • george1421G
          george1421 Moderator
          last edited by

          I did recompile the 4.17.13 kernel with the powersave setting from the Arch article, plus FOG kernel patches and then added support for Microsoft Surface network adapter (patch info found here: https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/10943/surface-pro-4-registration-issues ). This kernel is ‘M’ release. Please test it out.

          Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

          H 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • H
            hlalex @george1421
            last edited by

            @george1421 version M logs:

            • bzImage41713m.log
            • bzImage41713m_lshw.log
            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • H
              hlalex @george1421
              last edited by hlalex

              @george1421 FlexBay Parts:

              414-BBBV : PCIe SSD (Front PCIe FlexBay)
              Part Number Quantity Description
              5G90D 1 INFORMATION, FRONT, PERIPHERAL COMPONENT INTERCONNECT EXPRESS , SOFTWARE SUPPORT DISKETTE, BOOT

              401-ABJT : M.2 512GB PCIe NVMe Class 40 S olid State Drive
              Part Number Quantity Description
              XMW6J 1 SSDR, 512G, P34, 80S3, HYNIX, PC401

              400-AVDR : Dell M.2 carrier
              Part Number Quantity Description
              66XHV 1 ASSEMBLY, DRIVE, BAY (DRIVE BAY), M.2, MODULE

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • H
                hlalex @george1421
                last edited by

                @george1421 Ok, got some data from windows device manager for the FlexBay drive:

                PCI Memory Controller [ this was an uninitialized device, figured it best to include as it is a PCI device but probably not relevant ]

                • PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_A2A1&SUBSYS_07381028&REV_00

                Everything below l pertains to the M.2 connected to the FlexBay
                Disk drive
                Device instance path

                • SCSI\DISK&VEN_NVME&PROD_PC401_NVME_SK_HY\5&1A7BC20F&0&000000

                HW IDs

                • SCSI\DiskNVMe____PC401_NVMe_SK_hy3E00
                • SCSI\DiskNVMe____PC401_NVMe_SK_hy
                • SCSI\DiskNVMe____
                • SCSI\NVMe____PC401_NVMe_SK_hy3
                • NVMe____PC401_NVMe_SK_hy3
                • GenDisk

                Status

                • 0180200A
                • DN_DRIVER_LOADED
                • DN_STARTED
                • DN_DISABLEABLE
                • DN_NT_ENUMERATOR
                • DN_NT_DRIVER

                Class Guid

                • {4d36e967-e325-11ce-bfc1-08002be10318}

                Device stack

                • \Driver\partmgr
                • \Driver\Disk
                • \Driver\EhStorClass
                • \Driver\stornvme

                Driver node strong name

                • disk.inf:6d166ee9677c725c:disk_install.NT:10.0.16299.371:GenDisk

                0_1534434310029_general.JPG
                0_1534434324187_driver.jpg
                0_1534434336379_events.JPG

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • H
                  hlalex
                  last edited by

                  @george1421 version N:

                  • bzImage41713n.log
                  • bzImage41713n_lshw.log
                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • H
                    hlalex
                    last edited by

                    0_1534442445193_bzImage4139-300m.jpg

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • H
                      hlalex
                      last edited by hlalex

                      @george1421 Success!!

                      Here are the logs:

                      • bzImage4139-300m.log
                      • bzImage4139-300m_lshw.log

                      One thing I noticed is I got some weird DHCP messages before it booted to the debug console. I will try to replicate and grab an image if possible.

                      Edit: Shot of the DHCP messages. It says it didn’t get an IP, but it actually does. After pressing [enter] it drops to the debug shell.
                      0_1534444078002_bzImage4139-300m-DHCP.jpg

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • S
                        Sebastian Roth Moderator
                        last edited by

                        @george1421 I am really keen to hear what you did with kernel -300m as this seems to make a difference… right track I suppose. Maybe this is some kind of timeout?!

                        Web GUI issue? Please check apache error (debian/ubuntu: /var/log/apache2/error.log, centos/fedora/rhel: /var/log/httpd/error_log) and php-fpm log (/var/log/php*-fpm.log)

                        Please support FOG if you like it: https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/Support_FOG

                        george1421G 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • george1421G
                          george1421 Moderator @Sebastian Roth
                          last edited by

                          @sebastian-roth Sorry its been a long day of poking and pulling the linux kernel.
                          Today I tried the setting from the Arch document with no luck in the ‘M’ release.
                          Then I tried just removing all of the power saving code out of the kernel as well as removing all acpi code, with no success. The ‘N’ release.
                          Next I was about to give up then I got the idea since the FC27 kernel worked when FC27 live was booted I decided to take the tar file you linked below and just straight copy over the ‘M’ config file and then built the kernel. I did this to test 2 ideas. 1) Did I have the right kernel options selected from the 4.17.13 release 2) Was the FC devs able to patch the 4.13.9 kernel to make it work with the OPs hardware. Both tests were successful. That is what @hlalex posted in the bzImage4139-300m.log log file. In another thread an OP had an issue with the current FOS kernel and an Microsoft usb network adapter. I added the patch into 4.17.13 M kernel build. That network driver was then discovered by FOS, but FOS still has the delayed creation of the GPT partition. So that mystery was not solved as of now either. I was kind of hoping the updated FOS kernel would have addressed that but not as of now.

                          Back on point so… It would be ideal to understand what the FC kernel dev guys did to linux 4.13.9 to create 4.13.9-300. I assume the -300 means there was 300 patches to the stock 4.13.9 kernel (??). The only thing I can think is to do a (mega)diff between linux 4.13.9 and the FC 4.13.9-300. To see what has changed.

                          Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • george1421G
                            george1421 Moderator @Sebastian Roth
                            last edited by

                            @sebastian-roth It appears the -100 -200 -300 numbering is based on the FC release and not to indicate a patch level.

                            0_1534459963892_fc_numbers.png

                            So that means I’m back to trying to figure out how to diff all of the files between FC version and linux version of 4.13.9.

                            Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • george1421G
                              george1421 Moderator
                              last edited by

                              Will you give the linux 4.13.9 kernel a shot before you send the hardware back this week? This last test will tell use if the fix is in the 4.13.9 kernel or something that FC did with 4.13.9-300 kernel.

                              Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

                              H 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • H
                                hlalex @george1421
                                last edited by

                                @george1421 Sure thing, I’m keeping them around as long as possible so we can get as much info as possible from them.

                                H 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • H
                                  hlalex @hlalex
                                  last edited by

                                  @george1421 I have to get these drives shipped out by 3:30pm EST today. I anyone has any additional test let me know and I will get anything I can.

                                  Otherwise, Thanks for all the help!

                                  george1421G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • george1421G
                                    george1421 Moderator @hlalex
                                    last edited by

                                    @hlalex Thank you for your help. Go ahead and send them back at this time. It looks like kernel changes between 4.13.x and 4.17.x has disabled these types of drives. My only option would be to see if 4.18 has fixed the issue. But at this point you have a solution and the hardware must go back. So we’ll park testing until someone else has this issue. Again thank you for all of your testing and data collection. We would not have made it this far without your help.

                                    Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • B
                                      bright23
                                      last edited by

                                      I have this same issue and have several machines in stock to test with if needed. However, I’m not nearly as Linux savvy as hlalex. I appreciate the effort you two have already put into it.

                                      george1421G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • george1421G
                                        george1421 Moderator @bright23
                                        last edited by

                                        @bright23

                                        There are a few more ideas I’ve had.

                                        First make sure your system is configured for uefi and have secure boot disabled, as well as have legacy roms disabled in the firmware.

                                        Well if you are willing to try the 4.18.3 kernel I built yesterday, we can continue testing. It does seem to be that something broke (changed) after linux kernel 4.13.x

                                        Here is the 4.18.3 kernel I built yesterday: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1VVXEVY0p2Gl2w4WvT_0jstOtV1jLBp1k

                                        1. Download that file to /var/www/html/fog/service/ipxe directory on the fog server.
                                        2. Register one of these ‘troubled’ workstations
                                        3. Go into the host management of this ‘troubled’ workstation and in the Host Kernel field enter bzImage4183
                                        4. Schedule an image deployment, but before you submit the deployment task, tick the debug check box.
                                        5. PXE boot the target computer, it should go right into deployment.
                                        6. After several enter key presses on the target computer you should be dropped to a linux command prompt.
                                        7. At this point I just want you to key in one command lsblk. I need to know if you see something that is similar to /dev/nvme0n1 listed as one of the block devices.

                                        Try the above steps with

                                        I’m in the process of rebuilding the inits to support Linux kernel 4.13.x. I’ll have another test in about 1 hr to try and older kernel with the current FOS inits. This is a lame attempt to get things moving until we can get a better understanding of what we are seeing here.

                                        Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

                                        B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • george1421G
                                          george1421 Moderator
                                          last edited by

                                          Something I want you try first before the new kernel, read through my previous post to understand where/what I’m talking about.

                                          For this first test, I want you to go into host management for one of these troubled systems and in the Kernel Parameters field add nvme_load=YES Using the stock out of box FOS kernels.

                                          Setup a debug deployment as below and see if lsblk returns the nvme drive.

                                          Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

                                          B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • B
                                            bright23 @george1421
                                            last edited by

                                            @george1421 sorry I just had a moment to get back to you. I’m running Kernel 4.17.0 and have “Host Kernel Arguments” = nvme_load=YES, booting into debug running lsblk returns nothing.

                                            B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 5
                                            • 6
                                            • 7
                                            • 4 / 7
                                            • First post
                                              Last post

                                            192

                                            Online

                                            12.0k

                                            Users

                                            17.3k

                                            Topics

                                            155.2k

                                            Posts
                                            Copyright © 2012-2024 FOG Project