• Recent
  • Unsolved
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • Recent
  • Unsolved
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Lenovo X1 Yoga 1st gen with OneLink+

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
Hardware Compatibility
2
8
1.3k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T
    texturtle
    last edited by May 9, 2018, 8:32 PM

    Attempting to capture an image. I was finally able to get the system to initiate a PXE boot, but it initially said that it couldn’t find an ethernet adapter once the kernel loads. This was an indication that the kernel didn’t have the proper driver for the ethernet adapter on the OneLink+. After I updated to a newer kernel, I now get a kernel panic using 4.16.6 indicating it was unable to process the init file.

    I’m not really a well versed Linux admin (mostly a Windows user) but I was able to get several other systems imaged with no problems. Any help would be appreciated.

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • G
      george1421 Moderator
      last edited by May 10, 2018, 9:54 AM

      This post may be related to your kernel update error: https://forums.fogproject.org/topic/11863/starting-init-sbin-init-exists-but-couldn-t-execute-it-error-8/5

      When you say “the kernel didn’t have the proper driver for the ethernet adapter on the OneLink”, which kernel do you speak of? Do you get to the FOG iPXE menu? If you don’t then its an iPXE boot loader issue. If you get to the FOG iPXE menu but FOS can’t detect an IP address then its the bzImage kernel.

      Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • T
        texturtle
        last edited by May 10, 2018, 1:59 PM

        Sorry, when I try kernel 4.15.2 I get to the Fog menu, but when it loads the kernel to start host registration it can’t find a network adapter. If I update to the latest available, 4.16.6, I get a kernel panic.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • T
          texturtle
          last edited by May 10, 2018, 2:21 PM

          Interesting. Now, this morning, after downloading the 4.16.6 kernel again it is no longer causing a kernel panic, but it also indicates that it can’t find a network interface.

          G 1 Reply Last reply May 10, 2018, 3:23 PM Reply Quote 0
          • G
            george1421 Moderator @texturtle
            last edited by george1421 May 10, 2018, 9:24 AM May 10, 2018, 3:23 PM

            @texturtle The kernel panic (as I understand what Tom posted) is the x86 and x64 kernels got mixed up during publishing. (again this is how I understood what was posted) So you were actually attempting to boot a 32bit kernel against a 64bit disk image, which caused the panic.

            So the Onelink adapter is not being detected by FOS…
            OK you can either do this from a running windows system or configure a debug session in FOG.

            Lets collect the vendor ID and hardware ID of this network adapter. In windows its pretty easy via the device manager, In FOS its not too bad either.

            So for FOS,

            1. manually register this system.
            2. Schedule a capture or deploy job, it doesn’t matter. But before you submit the task select the debug checkbox. Then submit the job.
            3. PXE boot the target computer
            4. After a few key presses you should be dropped to a linux command prompt
            5. Key in lspci -nn|grep etw That should list out all of the network adapters. What the developers will need is the vendor ID shown there. It should be in the form of this [8086:4421] (totally made up number). But with that vendor ID the developers can check to see if there are linux kernel drivers available for that system.

            We should probably also capture any model numbers of that network adapter (or dock as it were) for future reference.

            Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • T
              texturtle
              last edited by texturtle May 10, 2018, 11:47 AM May 10, 2018, 5:46 PM

              First, thank you for your assistance.

              So I tried this, but it only listed the wireless NIC. So I tried again just using “lspci -nn” and the only thing it lists for a “Realtek” device is the PCI express card reader, it doesn’t seem to list the NIC at all.
              So I went into Windows to check on the device manager. Device manager lists it as “ThinkPad OneLink Plus Dock Ethernet” and it shows up as a USB Ethernet adapter.

              Hardware ID in dev mgr: USB\VID_17EF&PID_3504&REV_3001 and USB\VID_17EF&PID_3504

              It does not list a Vendor ID.
              Manufacturer is Realtek.

              Model: ThinkPad OneLink+
              Model number: DU9047S1

              G 1 Reply Last reply May 10, 2018, 6:52 PM Reply Quote 0
              • G
                george1421 Moderator @texturtle
                last edited by May 10, 2018, 6:52 PM

                @texturtle said in Lenovo X1 Yoga 1st gen with OneLink+:

                Hardware ID in dev mgr: USB\VID_17EF&PID_3504&REV_3001 and USB\VID_17EF&PID_3504

                OK that is good enough, to translate that into a linux vendor code it would be [17EF:3504]

                Just for grins on that system. If its registered with fog. Go to the host configuration for that system and add the following kernel argument. has_usb_nic=1 and then try to pxe boot into the iPXE menu and pick hardware compatibility test.

                Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • T
                  texturtle
                  last edited by May 10, 2018, 7:26 PM

                  I didn’t see the option for a hardware compatibility test on the iPXE menu, so I tried the option for “client system information (compatibility)”.

                  It was unable to find the NIC as well.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • 1 / 1
                  1 / 1
                  • First post
                    8/8
                    Last post

                  158

                  Online

                  12.1k

                  Users

                  17.3k

                  Topics

                  155.3k

                  Posts
                  Copyright © 2012-2024 FOG Project