• Recent
    • Unsolved
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. Towndrunk
    3. Posts
    T
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 8
    • Posts 78
    • Best 1
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Posts made by Towndrunk

    • RE: New Lenovo M900 Tiny Computers

      @Wayne-Workman, I don’t believe I ever set a password for SQL. During the initial installation it asked if I wanted a password, and said to leave it blank if I didn’t want one. I wasn’t to worried about it since the server was used for FOG and nothing else.

      I just ran the Trunk install again, and made sure the entire install went through. Afterwards I checked the contents of the /opt/fog/.fogsettings and here is what I found.

      ipaddress=‘10.15.31.20’
      interface=‘eth0’
      routeraddress=‘option routers 10.15.31.1;’
      plainrouter=‘10.15.31.1’
      dnsaddress=‘option domain-name-servers 8.8.8.8;’
      dnsbootimage=“8.8.8.8”;
      password=“6GtO35zHL+Ypw7VVFu+i7S4kp2keVoDv0rHurDnjI7Y=”
      osid=‘2’
      osname=‘Debian’
      dodhcp=‘n’
      bldhcp=‘0’
      installtype=‘N’
      snmysqluser=‘root’
      snmysqlpass=“”
      snmysqlhost=‘localhost’
      installlang=‘’
      donate=‘0’
      fogupdateloaded=1
      submask=‘’
      dhcpd=‘’
      blexports=‘1’
      storageLocation=‘/images’
      username=‘fog’
      docroot=‘/var/www/html/’
      webroot=‘/fog/’
      caCreated=‘yes’
      startrange=‘’
      endrange=‘’
      bootfilename=‘undionly.kpxe’
      packages=‘apache2 build-essential cpp curl g++ gcc gzip htmldoc lftp libapache2-mod-php5 libc6 libcurl3 m4 mysql-client mysql-server net-tools nfs-kernel-server openssh-server php5 php5-cli php5-curl php5-fpm php5-gd php5-json php5-mcrypt php5-mysqlnd php-gettext sysv-rc-conf tar tftpd-hpa tftp-hpa vsftpd wget xinetd zlib1g ’
      noTftpBuild=’’
      notpxedefaultfile=‘’
      sslpath=‘/opt/fog/snapins/ssl/’
      backupPath=‘/home/’
      php_ver=‘5’
      php_verAdds=‘-5.6’

      posted in Hardware Compatibility
      T
      Towndrunk
    • RE: New Lenovo M900 Tiny Computers

      This happened the yesterday when I did the install as well. I’m using Ubuntu 14.04, and during the install of Trunk my screen turns off after being inactive for a certain amount of time. When I bring it back up, my password to log in is no longer valid. I have to get into the GRUB prompt to get back in. I don’t know if the install even really finished or not.

      posted in Hardware Compatibility
      T
      Towndrunk
    • RE: New Lenovo M900 Tiny Computers

      @Wayne-Workman, I just looked the logs in FOG, and it appears as though there may be an FTP credential issue? I see this over and over.

      [Wed Jul 13 08:34:33.547856 2016] [:error] [pid 5725] [client 10.15.32.99:36668] PHP Warning: ftp_login(): Login incorrect. in /var/www/html/fog/lib/fog/fogftp.class.php on line 107

      posted in Hardware Compatibility
      T
      Towndrunk
    • RE: New Lenovo M900 Tiny Computers

      I removed all of the images I had on FOG, and attempted to capture both a new Win7 and a Win10 image from the two computers listed below. The Windows 7 PC appears to be working, and is going through the process now. I will check it once it is done. The Windows 10 failed the capture right away.

      Here is what I received on the Win10 PC. When I browse the /var/log folder and look for the partclone.log it doesn’t exist.

      Partclone fail, please check /var/log/partclone.log
      An error has been detected!
      Failed to complete capture (savePartition)
      Args Passed: /dev/sda2 1 /images/002324b78557 all
      Computer will reboot in 1 minutes

      posted in Hardware Compatibility
      T
      Towndrunk
    • RE: New Lenovo M900 Tiny Computers

      PC:DefaultWin10
      Same Lenovo M900 tiny as DefaultWin7 PC.
      First thing we did is update the BIOS, then using the same drive I loaded Windows 10 via a VLK.
      Install was a custom install, deleting all old partitions and installing Windows 10.
      Ran updates, and wanted to use this as a base image and build from there.

      #2 Network Information
      1: lo: <LOOPBACK, UP, LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc nonqueueqlen 1
      link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
      inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
      valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
      2: eth0: <BROADCAST, MULTICAST, UP, LOWER_UP> ntu 1500 qdisck pfifo_fast qlen 1000
      link/ether 00:23:24:b7:85:57 brb ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
      inet 10.15.32.72/24 brb 10.15.32.255 scope global eth0
      valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
      DNS Information
      search xxxx.local # eth0
      nameserver 10.15.31.25 # eth0
      nameserver 10.15.31.24 # eth0

      #3 Partition Information
      Model: ATA SanDisk SD7TB6S2 (scsi)
      Disk /dev/sda: 256GB
      Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
      Partition Table: msdos
      Disk Flags:

      Start End Size Type File System Flags

      1 1049kB 525MB 524MB primary ntfs boot
      2 525MB 256GB 256GB primary ntfs

      #4 FOG Compatibility Test
      FOG Compatibility Test
      Computer appears to be compatible with FOG!
      Results
      Network [Pass]
      Disk [Pass]

      posted in Hardware Compatibility
      T
      Towndrunk
    • RE: New Lenovo M900 Tiny Computers

      PC: DefautlWin7
      Lenovo M900 tiny.
      Unboxed PC and booted with factory installed Windows 7 OS, and then updated the BIOS.
      Ran all the updates (excluding the Windows 10 upgrade)

      #2 Network Information
      1: lo: <LOOPBACK, UP, LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc nonqueueqlen 1
      link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
      inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
      valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
      2: eth0: <BROADCAST, MULTICAST, UP, LOWER_UP> ntu 1500 qdisck pfifo_fast qlen 1000
      link/ether 00:23:24:b7:84:ca brb ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
      inet 10.15.32.99/24 brb 10.15.32.255 scope global eth0
      valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
      DNS Information
      search xxxx.local # eth0
      nameserver 10.15.31.25 # eth0
      nameserver 10.15.31.24 # eth0

      #3 Partition Information
      Model: ATA SanDisk SD7TB6S2 (scsi)
      Disk /dev/sda: 256GB
      Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
      Partition Table: msdos
      Disk Flags:

      Start End Size Type File System Flags

      1 1049kB 1574MB 1573MB primary ntfs boot
      2 1574MB 243GB 241GB primary ntfs
      3 243GB 256GB 13.4GB primary ntfs

      #4 FOG Compatibility Test
      FOG Compatibility Test
      Computer appears to be compatible with FOG!
      Results
      Network [Pass]
      Disk [Pass]

      posted in Hardware Compatibility
      T
      Towndrunk
    • RE: New Lenovo M900 Tiny Computers

      @Tom-Elliott, OK. Maybe I was just a little confused. I thought that one of the items was size on server, and that was 0. I was making the assumption that it was reading the size of the drive like you said for “size on client”. The old 1.2.0 said size on server was 0, which I thought meant it didn’t actually capture an image.

      I was hoping that updating to Trunk was going to resolve some of this, but it doesn’t appear as though it has. I will continue to work on this since I want to get it working.

      This was an old server that we used for our last deployment of Acer M498G desktops. I was able to pull and deploy images with no issues, but now with the new computers I’m having an issue. That is why I thought this was hardware issue, and not an issue with FOG.

      posted in Hardware Compatibility
      T
      Towndrunk
    • RE: New Lenovo M900 Tiny Computers

      @george1421, once I updated the system to Trunk, I deleted all of the images and hosts, and started over. What you see in the image was all done after updating. I can run the compatibility tests tomorrow once I’m back in the office, but the Windows 7 out of the box load, and the Windows 10 on the new disk both seemed to work. The Windows 10 that I loaded with VLK on the system drive that came with the PC did not work.

      I had the Win 7 image, and tried to deploy it to a third PC, and it would not work. Like the image wasn’t really there. I know I’m not being very descriptive, but I can give more information once I am in front of the computers again tomorrow. It connects, registers, but it doesn’t seem to be capturing a valid image.

      posted in Hardware Compatibility
      T
      Towndrunk
    • RE: New Lenovo M900 Tiny Computers

      I’m sort of at a loss now. I have tried Windows 7 out of the box setup, Windows 10 installed from a VLK on the same disk, and Windows 10 installed from VLK on new disk. Two will capture and image to FOG, but there is no data. The other will not work at all.

      I went and updated my install to “Trunk” by following the Wiki. The following is what I have now. I need to take a break, and I will come back to this later. Thanks for all the help so far. I really do appreciate it. I am attempting to post a link as well to what I see on my image screen.

      Running Version 8533
      SVN Revision: 5891

      https://www.dropbox.com/s/awbzqh83smouri1/Fog.JPG?dl=0

      FOG Images

      posted in Hardware Compatibility
      T
      Towndrunk
    • RE: New Lenovo M900 Tiny Computers

      Yes, you are correct. I am using FOG 1.2.0. I’m sorry, it has been a while since we pushed out new computers so I haven’t kept up to date. Should I be looking into another configuration? If so, now would be the time to do it before we get to far into this. I will look into “Trunk” and see if I can find anything.

      I spoke to soon as well. I tried to upload an image from the same models so we could have a default Win 7 and Win 10 image. I just looked at the FOG images, and both look as though they connected to the server, but didn’t work out as I had hoped.

      Win 7 says 224.57 GiB on the client, and 0 GiB on the server. With the correct time I uploaded today.
      Win 10 is almost the same. 465.27 Gib on the client, and 0 GiB on the server.

      posted in Hardware Compatibility
      T
      Towndrunk
    • RE: New Lenovo M900 Tiny Computers

      The new drive loaded with Win 10 is working great, and I am in the process of uploading an image now. If I can get a good image off of this drive, will it cause any issues pushing it out to the other devices with the factory formatted GPT drives?

      posted in Hardware Compatibility
      T
      Towndrunk
    • RE: New Lenovo M900 Tiny Computers

      I had already started loading another spare SSD we had with Windows 10, using the same VLK. I will see if that works any better. If not, I will try your recommendation. I may try it either way, just to see if that was the issue. Thanks for the response.

      posted in Hardware Compatibility
      T
      Towndrunk
    • RE: New Lenovo M900 Tiny Computers

      I’m not sure if this make a difference or not either, since I use this same setup at another location where I have deployed FOG. The following is the settings I’m using for the Windows 10 image that I’m trying to pull.

      Operating System: 8.1
      Image Type: Multiple Partition Image - Single Disk (Not Resizable)

      posted in Hardware Compatibility
      T
      Towndrunk
    • New Lenovo M900 Tiny Computers

      I’m about to roll out 350 new computers to replace the existing computers that we have now. I was able to roll out all the previous computers with Fog, and had no issues, so I wanted to do the same with these new ones.

      We have purchased Lenovo m900 computers loaded with Windows 7, with an option to update to Windows 10. I have loaded up one PC to Windows 7, ran all the updates, and made an image with no issues. I did have to update the Kernel, but that wasn’t a big deal and was sort of expected.

      Another PC I have loaded Windows 10 with a VLK. I wiped the entire drive during the install and allowed Windows to do what it had to do. I ran all the updates, got the software we needed, and wanted to create a default image. I can register it, however when I try and pull an image it gets to the hard disk and just stops. I logged into the PC, went to Disk Management, and it shows that the Partition Style is set to MBR.

      I ran the compatibility check on the Partition Information and then Check FOG Compatibility, and this is what I get. I have even reloaded Win 10 thinking that it was related to a BIOS update that a co-worker did. I’m not sure if this is a Windows issue, or if it is because I’m running Ubuntu for the server.

      Partition Information
      Model: ATA SanDisk SD7TB6S2 (scsi)
      Disk /dev/sda: 256GB
      Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
      Partition Table: gpt
      Disk Flags: pmbr_boot

      Warning: /dev/sda contain GPT signatures, indicating that it has a GPT table. However, it does not have valid msdos partition table, as it should. Perhaps it was corrupted – possibly by a program that doesn’t understand GPT partition talbes. Or perhaps you deleted the GPT table, and are not using and msdos partitio table. Is this a GPT partition table?

      posted in Hardware Compatibility
      T
      Towndrunk
    • RE: Active Directory & Specific OU

      In our small lab setup, I had a computer that was ready to be imaged. I added it to the inventory, went into the host settings and set up the AD information with the correct OU information. After I pulled an image from it, it added itself to the domain and put it in the OU that I specified. So it worked at the Host level.

      I am going to try to it at the group level using the same image with another PC. It is nice that it works, but for the amount of work that goes into doing it at the Host level, I would be better off just moving the computer on my own in AD to the OU that I want. I’ll see how the next test goes.

      posted in FOG Problems
      T
      Towndrunk
    • RE: Active Directory & Specific OU

      I didn’t make any changes to the default settings. I want it to be added to the domain no matter what, but I left the OU setting blank in the Default Settings so it would just go to the Computer OU if nothing else was selected. I assumed if I put something else in Host/Group it would supersede the Default Settings. I have a test computer running an image now to see.

      posted in FOG Problems
      T
      Towndrunk
    • RE: Active Directory & Specific OU

      @george1421 said:

      G applies the information to the host based on the group but the group

      Thanks. I will try that now. I had only tried it at the Group level since I figured that would be the easiest way to keep those computers for that group, in that same OU. The one thing I didn’t try was doing an inventory on the host, then changing that host to a specific OU. If it works, great. At the same time it may just be easier to move all of them from the computers OU once they are imaged instead of going through 3-400 Hosts changing the OU.

      posted in FOG Problems
      T
      Towndrunk
    • Active Directory & Specific OU

      I have been reading for quite some time, however I can’t see to find an answer to this. I’m using a new installation of FOG 1.2.0 that I have been prepping for a new computer roll out that we will be doing next year. I would like have the PC automatically join the domain, and be placed in a specific OU for the group that it is associate with.

      I have used FogCrypt and have the correct information in Active Directory Defaults. I am able to join the domain with no issues. I am not able to have the computer placed in any other OU besides “Computers”. I have tried changing the information in the Groups section as well as the default just to see if it works. Every tutorial shows to have it in LDAP format, and I have (OU=Maintenance,DC=OttawaCC,DC=local).

      Once I make the change to the group after leaving the defaults open, I select save. . . and everything disappears. I’m not sure what I’m doing wrong, but I would like to figure this out if possible. Thanks.

      posted in FOG Problems
      T
      Towndrunk
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 4 / 4