• Recent
    • Unsolved
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. Jarl2.0
    3. Posts
    J
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 5
    • Posts 23
    • Best 1
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Posts made by Jarl2.0

    • RE: Error 'Could not open inode 'XXXXXX" through the library'

      @sebastian-roth

      It was after I removed the previous Windows version is when I had issues. I could take an image after upgrading to 1709 but when I went to clean out the previous windows version the next attempt to take an image would fail. I would say this happened about 4-5 times with different PCs (same model) before I pin pointed what step caused the image to fail.

      Steps for me were like this.

      1. Win10 machine with 1703 - Image Success
      2. Upgrade to 1709 - Image Success
      3. Remove old patch data - Image Success
      4. Remove previous Windows version - Image failed

      I removed the patch data and previous Windows install via Disk cleanup > Cleanup system files.

      posted in FOG Problems
      J
      Jarl2.0
    • RE: Error 'Could not open inode 'XXXXXX" through the library'

      @sebastian-roth Yes I’m able to reproduce this. Clean install upgrade to 1709 test capture > Windows cleanup to remove old patch data and previous versions of the OS.

      The cleanup is done with windows disk cleanup.

      Another update is that I am able to take an update with the “Multiple Partition Image - Single Disk” image type. I would prefer Single Disk Re-sizable but it always failed.

      These settings are working for us to capture 1709 images.

      0_1516981130795_Capture.PNG

      posted in FOG Problems
      J
      Jarl2.0
    • RE: Error 'Could not open inode 'XXXXXX" through the library'

      I have some more info on this, it seems to only happen for me after I remove the old Windows versions from a PC I want to take an image of. A freshly updated PC to 1709 will have no issues until you try to cleanup those files. Which is annoying because they take up about 30gigs of space.

      posted in FOG Problems
      J
      Jarl2.0
    • RE: Error 'Could not open inode 'XXXXXX" through the library'

      Went through and imaged a new laptop with a 1703 image was able to make some changes and take an image from 1703 just fine. Upgraded to 1709 and got the same inode error, something must have change I’m going to try to sysprep the image to see if that helps but sysprep has been failing for me on 1709 as well.

      posted in FOG Problems
      J
      Jarl2.0
    • RE: Error 'Could not open inode 'XXXXXX" through the library'

      @sebastian-roth Tried your suggestions still having no luck, I’ll look at some of the other posts on the forums and see if I can find anything that works.

      posted in FOG Problems
      J
      Jarl2.0
    • RE: Error 'Could not open inode 'XXXXXX" through the library'

      I’ve confirmed that fast boot is disabled and I am still getting the error.

      posted in FOG Problems
      J
      Jarl2.0
    • Error 'Could not open inode 'XXXXXX" through the library'

      FOG Verision: 1.4.4
      Server: Ubuntu 16.04
      Client Windows 10 (1709 Fall update)
      Image: Single Disk - Re sizable, Everything, Partclone Zstd Compression 12

      I’m getting the attached error when trying to take an image from a client after the Windows version 1709 update. I’ve used this model of PC to take images in the past before so I don’t think its a hardware issue.

      https://imgur.com/a/vrhGk

      posted in FOG Problems
      J
      Jarl2.0
    • RE: FOG imaging blankspace

      Bitlocker must have kicked off at some point it was encrypted but it hadn’t generated a key or locked the drive yet.

      posted in FOG Problems
      J
      Jarl2.0
    • RE: FOG imaging blankspace

      My fog is version 1.4.4, same model of laptop with the exact same innards. I take images before bitlocker is enabled but I will take another look at this.

      posted in FOG Problems
      J
      Jarl2.0
    • FOG imaging blankspace

      I’m having an issue where FOG seems to be imaging the blank space on a drive. I attached a screen shot that shows I took three images of the same PC with the same settings yet two of them came back with an on client size at 238GB. On the server its only about 50GB so it’s not a huge issue but it does seem to be slowing down the imaging process. I also noticed that it said the file type was ‘RAW’ when taking/laying down the image vs NTFS etc. Just wondering why taking an image off the same hardware with the same settings is getting me two very different images.0_1510072899346_images.PNG

      posted in FOG Problems
      J
      Jarl2.0
    • Errors while PXE booting

      Lately I’ve been getting a ton of errors when PXE booting machines I’m running version 1.4.4 and some of the errors came up after some recent ubuntu updates. It seems to be taking and deploying images fine but it amount of errors is a little worrying.

      https://imgur.com/a/H6JId

      posted in FOG Problems
      J
      Jarl2.0
    • RE: Unable to reach Fog Management website

      @sebastian-roth That worked I have no idea how those rules got loaded onto the firewall however…

      posted in General Problems
      J
      Jarl2.0
    • RE: Unable to reach Fog Management website

      @george1421

      I connect to it via IP normally.

      Curling localhost and IP I got an HTML dump.

      @Sebastian-Roth the output was really long so I dumped it into a text file and copied it to pastebin. https://pastebin.com/DAUPa0F8

      posted in General Problems
      J
      Jarl2.0
    • RE: Unable to reach Fog Management website

      @george1421 Output from the grep command
      0_1503348086684_apache.PNG

      Output from netstat
      0_1503348102270_netstat.PNG

      No firewall service is running.

      posted in General Problems
      J
      Jarl2.0
    • RE: Unable to reach Fog Management website

      @george1421 It doesn’t the page comes up connection timed out and I don’t see any connection attempts on the apache logs.

      posted in General Problems
      J
      Jarl2.0
    • RE: Unable to reach Fog Management website

      The first dump is the tail from error.log.

      posted in General Problems
      J
      Jarl2.0
    • Unable to reach Fog Management website

      I’m unable to reach the fog website I’m getting a connection refused error. As far as I know nothing has changed recently and I was able to use it last week. I’ll attach the error logs from apache below but I already tried pulling the most recent release and installing it. All services seem to be up and running.

      [Mon Aug 21 13:25:25.064020 2017] [mpm_prefork:notice] [pid 1413] AH00169: caught SIGTERM, shutting down
      [Mon Aug 21 13:25:55.933090 2017] [mpm_prefork:notice] [pid 4358] AH00163: Apache/2.4.27 (Ubuntu) OpenSSL/1.1.0f configured – resuming normal operations
      [Mon Aug 21 13:25:55.933130 2017] [core:notice] [pid 4358] AH00094: Command line: ‘/usr/sbin/apache2’

      Edit:
      If I do service apache2 status it states that is is running but I’m getting the follow logs from that command

      Aug 21 14:19:13 fog apachectl[1307]: AH00548: NameVirtualHost has no effect and will be removed in the next release /etc/apache2/sites-enabled/001-fog.conf:1
      Aug 21 14:19:13 fog apachectl[1307]: AH00558: apache2: Could not reliably determine the server’s fully qualified domain name, using 127.0.1.1. Set the ‘ServerName’ directive globally to suppress th
      Aug 21 14:19:13 fog systemd[1]: Started The Apache HTTP Server.

      posted in General Problems
      J
      Jarl2.0
    • RE: Image Size

      This image came out to 17gig on the storage node which is great I’ll will keep tinkering with it to find a good compression ratio that also has a good deploy speed.

      Thanks!

      posted in General
      J
      Jarl2.0
    • RE: Image Size

      @george1421

      Yes the machine that came in at 47GB in Windows had a 46GB image file on the server. I’m taking a new image using partclonezstd now to see what that one comes in at.

      posted in General
      J
      Jarl2.0
    • RE: Image Size

      @george1421

      47.3GB which came out to a roughly 46.3 GB image

      posted in General
      J
      Jarl2.0
    • 1
    • 2
    • 1 / 2