• Recent
    • Unsolved
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. gballane
    3. Posts
    G
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 0
    • Posts 9
    • Best 0
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Posts made by gballane

    • RE: NIC Intel 82579LM PXE issue

      I just wanted to see if anyone had a chance to T/S this? Getting anxious due to deadlines!

      posted in Hardware Compatibility
      G
      gballane
    • RE: NIC Intel 82579LM PXE issue

      Same error message: Can’t have partition outside the disk…

      A message does flash really fast about an unsupported BIOS version… but I’m not sure if that is actually the problem we’re having.

      posted in Hardware Compatibility
      G
      gballane
    • RE: NIC Intel 82579LM PXE issue

      I tinkered with this some more. With the bzimage34 kernel… when it tries to push down to the client, it checks hard disk and says “image cannot be outside of disk” or something to that affect. Went into the client and it had a TON of partitions… more than the 250 GB hard drive… it was like 1TB+. I pulled out the HDD and reformatted in an external enclosure. Trying the push down again to the client.

      posted in Hardware Compatibility
      G
      gballane
    • RE: NIC Intel 82579LM PXE issue

      We didn’t try other machines… We had to restore it to the old kernel so that we could continue working!

      Hopefully, we can make some progress next week. Thanks for your help.

      posted in Hardware Compatibility
      G
      gballane
    • RE: NIC Intel 82579LM PXE issue

      No good… when uploading, getting partition errors. Tried to push it down, failed… said it pushed the image down really quick and finished in seconds.

      We are working with a Fujitsu T731.

      posted in Hardware Compatibility
      G
      gballane
    • RE: NIC Intel 82579LM PXE issue

      Will try it right now… stand by.

      posted in Hardware Compatibility
      G
      gballane
    • RE: NIC Intel 82579LM PXE issue

      I tried downloading your kermel but it had no file extension and was only 10.4 MB where as the 3.4 kernel is 96 MB

      I also tried just using the 3.4 kernel but when I got to the step of creating the bzImage I got this error:

      make[1]: Nothing to be done for all'. make[1]: Nothing to be done for relocs’.
      CHK include/linux/version.h
      CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h
      CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
      CHK include/generated/compile.h
      VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-int80-syms.lds
      VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-sysenter-syms.lds
      VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-syms.lds
      LD arch/x86/vdso/built-in.o
      LD arch/x86/built-in.o
      CC drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.o
      cc1: warnings being treated as errors
      drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c: In function ‘lpfc_bg_setup_bpl’:
      drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c:1900:11: error: unused variable ‘rc’
      drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c: In function ‘lpfc_bg_setup_bpl_prot’:
      drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c:2037:11: error: unused variable ‘rc’
      drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c: In function ‘lpfc_bg_setup_sgl’:
      drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c:2256:11: error: unused variable ‘rc’
      drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c: In function ‘lpfc_bg_setup_sgl_prot’:
      drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c:2386:11: error: unused variable ‘rc’
      make[3]: *** [drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.o] Error 1
      make[2]: *** [drivers/scsi/lpfc] Error 2
      make[1]: *** [drivers/scsi] Error 2
      make: *** [drivers] Error 2

      posted in Hardware Compatibility
      G
      gballane
    • RE: NIC Intel 82579LM PXE issue

      Thanks… is this kernel 3.3 with the addition for this NIC? So, would I be able to use this kernel with all of my machines, since they all worked with 3.3? I am thinking it would be easier, if this works, to apply the kernel to all machines.

      posted in Hardware Compatibility
      G
      gballane
    • RE: NIC Intel 82579LM PXE issue

      I am having this same issue and I’ve been watching this thread develop. I’m ready to try the 3.4 kernel.

      I have a few questions…

      1. Is this for both 32 and 64 bit clients?
      2. Will this work on both 32 and 64 bit ubuntu?
      posted in Hardware Compatibility
      G
      gballane
    • 1 / 1