@george1421 said in Setting french keyboard on FOS:
locale=fr_FR.UTF-8
It’s, i suppose, ipxe menu. I tried what you said but don’t work. I wil take a test on compiling Ipxe.
@george1421 said in Setting french keyboard on FOS:
locale=fr_FR.UTF-8
It’s, i suppose, ipxe menu. I tried what you said but don’t work. I wil take a test on compiling Ipxe.
When i use (fog settings -> general settings) kernel args (pkeys=fr) or keymap (fr-latin1 ) don’t work. Is there another way to make it work.
Thanks
Francis
Thank’s a lot for for quick response. We’ll test and comme back to you.
Have a good days
Francis
Bonjour,
J’ai mis en place une infrastructure FOG composée comme suit (schéma simplifié) :
Hello,
I have set up a FOG infrastructure composed as follows (simplified diagram):
Master FOG Web Access, Normal installation, Stor. group default, Node 1, Location 1
-----Stor. group 2, Node 2, Stor. facility, Rental 2 |
-----Stor. group 3, Node 3, Stor. install., Rental 3 |
-----Stor. group 4, Node 4, Stor. install., Rental 4 |
-----Stor. group 5, Node 5, Stor. install., Rental 5 |
All servers have been installed in HTTPS.
For images, I work a lot with replication and the location plugin, which work well and meet my needs.
Nevertheless, I am having difficulty with this operation for snapins.
I would like to be able to associate and deploy snapins by group and location.
That is to say, deploy snapins from all nodes, depending on the location of the workstation.
I set up a test infrastructure in HTTP: everything works correctly.
I can associate a snapin on group 2 and deploy it from node 2. So the client fetches the snapin on the node associated with it. Perfect.
In HTTPS, I can only deploy snapins from the master FOG (Normal installation).
I tried to install the master node in HTTPS and the storage nodes in HTTP.
In this case, the way I want the snapins to work works fine.
But I want, as much as possible, not to work in HTTP.
Especially since in this case, the storage nodes usage graphs are no longer visible on the web console.
My questions are:
Thank you !
And congratulations for the FOG product!
Today w’ve tested FOG with one new switch (a Cisco) and every problems leaves away. So i didn’t test udp-sender modifications. Our 2 switches are 1GoMps. Sebastian, i wil look to improve the french translation and i’ll send you back the language pack
Thank’s Sebastian,
I’will ty it on this monday the 15th of march 2021. Of course, i will send results. You’re probaly right with our switches. I triend to send with upd-sender a big file (about 30Go) to computers and all where stopped in the same configuration about 1 year ago. We have diffirent kind of services who do not speak together. The network team will comme on the day after. So I hope this will help, as the team ask for, second i should try for myself to translate to french the fog software (only on week ends) and if everythings goes right in netherland also. That’s should be my persnnal return an gift.
Ha ve a good week end, you and all the team
Francis Rohaert
Helle everyone,
First thanks to FOG team. I am a good frenchy, so don’t care with my english.
I am using FOG 1.5.9 on debian 10. we have about a thousand computers on différent classrooms. So we have cascading switches. Everythings goes right with one switch, but when we cascading switches, two in fact, fog drops computers and also get very slow rate. I tried, a long time ago, to use Udpcast and i realized that there where problems. So according to :
https://linux.die.net/man/1/udp-sender
I should try [–fec stripesxredundancy/stripesize] in udp-sender.
Where can i modify code to do this? Of course i Wille send the results.
Thanks