Thanks! I’ll try that out when I get to the office.

I think it’s a bug, but I’m not sure.

When I try downloading different kernels, I’m getting the following error:

FOGFTP: Failed to put file. Remote Path: /var/www/fogservice/ipxe/bzImage32, Local Path: /tmp/bzImage32, Error: ftp_put(): Could not create file.

It looks like a “/” is missing between fog and service so that it looks like /var/www/fog/service/ipxe/bzImage32.

Is there a way I quickly fix it? I tried debugging in Firefox, but my php skills aren’t that great.

Thanks.

[quote=“Tom Elliott, post: 34547, member: 7271”]SVN 2121 adds this request.[/quote]

Well fine, then. Be on top of things, why don’t ya! </sarcasm>

Thanks.

Perhaps a silly request because the link is at the footer of each page, but could there maybe be a link to download the FOG client service application on the main service configuration page (<server>/fog/management/index.php?node=service)?

This is just a nicety and makes the link for the service easier to find for new folks, and, admittedly, it took me awhile to find the link and I never thought to look at the footer until I dug deeper into a forum discussion.

Just a thought.

Thanks.

Received a notice within the past few weeks in my Ubuntu 12.04.4 install that my ‘Hardware Enablement Stack’ was losing support on 08/07/14 and that I should upgrade. Being security-minded, and just annoyed with upgrade messages, I normally update these sorts of things, but I’m hesitant to upgrade to the Trusty kernel without researching it out.

So I’m wondering if there’s any FOG compatibility problems with the Trusty kernel. My plan wouldn’t be to perform a full upgrade to 14.04 server, just stick with 12.04, but with a kernel update.

Thoughts?

[S]Perhaps dumb question, but I can’t find a clear answer: where exactly do you download the client service application?[/S]

Searched a little harder and found it.

The Fog Client Service Application can be found at [url]http://<your[/url] fog server>/fog/client.

Jesus. Great job! As one who rights how-to’s myself, I know that took a lot of work. Thanks.

FWIW, I’ve found htop to be a lot more useful than top.

[quote=“ianabc, post: 31998, member: 24548”]This is really puzzling, I’ll dig around and see if I have one of those cards available for testing. I think you already checked this, but could you confirm that in the fog debug ethtool reports 1000Mb as the negotiated speed and that you switch also agrees that this is the negotiated speed?[/quote]

I no longer have them here to test, but I can say for certain that that they auto-negotiated to gigabit. Even the switch was reading the speed as gigabit.

[quote=“Tom Elliott, post: 31960, member: 7271”]The kernel’s I’ve been building for quite some time have these drivers included already.

Otherwise, they wouldn’t work at all.[/quote]

Maybe there’s a problem with the Linux driver? Windows doesn’t seem to have the 100 Mbps problem that I had. The issue only appeared in FOG.