• Recent
    • Unsolved
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    After upgrade from Fog 0.32 to 1.1.0...

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    FOG Problems
    2
    5
    2.1k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • A
      Achieve94
      last edited by

      Hello,

      I was able to upgrade my FOG installation from version 0.32 to 1.1.0.

      Before this the 0.32 install worked really well. However after the upgrade, using 64-bit kernel 3.14.2, when I boot into PXE and request an image download, I get the following error messages:

      esas2r: driver will not be loaded because no ATTO esas2r devices were found.
      i2c-parport-light: adapter type was unspecified
      Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS unable to mount root fs on unknown-block (1,0)
      Kernel Offset: 0x0 from 0xffffffff81000000 (relocation range: 0xffffffff81000000 - 0xffffffff9fffffff)

      I should say that I have tried to use the 32-bit kernel 3.14.2 but the client PC didn’t even get to this error prompt. Similarly, the kernel 3.8.8 core was no good.

      The computer has got an Intel DG41WV motherboard with an on-board Realtek LAN card; and as stated above it worked fine with FOG 0.32.

      The image I’m trying to download is a Windows 7 one which were created using FOG 0.32.

      Any ideas please?

      Thanks.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Tom ElliottT
        Tom Elliott
        last edited by

        Try a different kernel:

        [url]https://mastacontrola.com/fogboot/kernel/bzImage[/url] (64 bit kernel)
        [url]https://mastacontrola.com/fogboot/kernel/bzImage32[/url] (32 bit kernel)

        The reason why 3.8.8-core is no good is because it is a 32 bit kernel, where the init you’re trying to load is a 64 bit setup and requires a 64 bit kernel.

        Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG! Get in contact with me (chat bubble in the top right corner) if you want to join in.

        Web GUI issue? Please check apache error (debian/ubuntu: /var/log/apache2/error.log, centos/fedora/rhel: /var/log/httpd/error_log) and php-fpm log (/var/log/php*-fpm.log)

        Please support FOG if you like it: https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/Support_FOG

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • A
          Achieve94
          last edited by

          Brilliant, the 64-bit kernel solved the problem. Many thanks for your help.

          Just wondering why the 64-bit (kernel 3.14.2) I initially downloaded from the FOG GUI didn’t do the magic.

          Cheers!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Tom ElliottT
            Tom Elliott
            last edited by

            [quote=“Achieve94, post: 29833, member: 24570”]Brilliant, the 64-bit kernel solved the problem. Many thanks for your help.

            Just wondering why the 64-bit (kernel 3.14.2) I initially downloaded from the FOG GUI didn’t do the magic.

            Cheers![/quote]

            Maybe you chose an Arch = x86 as opposed to Arch = x86_64?

            Please help us build the FOG community with everyone involved. It's not just about coding - way more we need people to test things, update documentation and most importantly work on uniting the community of people enjoying and working on FOG! Get in contact with me (chat bubble in the top right corner) if you want to join in.

            Web GUI issue? Please check apache error (debian/ubuntu: /var/log/apache2/error.log, centos/fedora/rhel: /var/log/httpd/error_log) and php-fpm log (/var/log/php*-fpm.log)

            Please support FOG if you like it: https://wiki.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/Support_FOG

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • A
              Achieve94
              last edited by

              I was actually looking at the official kernel list which has x64 and x 32 bits Archs.
              Just had a look under the unofficial list and spotted the x86_64 and x86 Archs. Good to know they are there.

              Again, thanks for your help.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • 1 / 1
              • First post
                Last post

              166

              Online

              12.1k

              Users

              17.3k

              Topics

              155.3k

              Posts
              Copyright © 2012-2024 FOG Project