Bonded NICs not working



  • Hi Guys,

    I’ve been trying to set on the bonding on my NICs but I can’t seem to get a transfer speed over 125MB/s. I’ve followed the guide here: [url]http://fogproject.org/forum/threads/how-to-network-bonding-raid-arrays.40/[/url] but I just can’t seem to get it to work. I’m using Ubuntu 11.10 on a VMWare system.

    Please find my ifconfig output here:
    bond0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:56:9f:5b:7c
    inet addr:10.10.16.80 Bcast:0.0.0.0 Mask:255.255.248.0
    inet6 addr: fe80::250:56ff:fe9f:5b7c/64 Scope:Link
    UP BROADCAST RUNNING MASTER MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
    RX packets:23282005 errors:0 dropped:1564 overruns:0 frame:0
    TX packets:37523612 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
    collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
    RX bytes:2169127036 (2.1 GB) TX bytes:56127955684 (56.1 GB)

    eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:56:9f:5b:7c
    UP BROADCAST RUNNING SLAVE MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
    RX packets:11640248 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
    TX packets:18762238 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
    collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
    RX bytes:1084440814 (1.0 GB) TX bytes:28064878434 (28.0 GB)

    eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:56:9f:5b:7c
    UP BROADCAST RUNNING SLAVE MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
    RX packets:11641757 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
    TX packets:18761374 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
    collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
    RX bytes:1084686222 (1.0 GB) TX bytes:28063077250 (28.0 GB)

    Regardz :)



  • I was playing with the same idea of running FOG on a VM and allocate all physical resources to it. It seems like there’s some network slow down in the emulation layer and I couldn’t get more that 250MB/min. Where as on the same physical server if I did a raw Ubuntu 11.10/FOG0.32 install I could get steady 1.6GB/min speeds. I think you’ll find you’ll be much better off on a dedicated server even if it’s not a super beefy machine. I also messed around with Bonding mulitple NICs and got nothing but trouble unless you just want it as a hot backup. There are a lot more errors when trying to load balance and ended up not being worth the trouble.


 

448
Online

41.8k
Users

12.4k
Topics

116.6k
Posts