• Recent
    • Unsolved
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Using bridged network adapter with Fog server

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    FOG Problems
    3
    5
    2.0k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • T
      TheJudgeMent
      last edited by

      Hi, I was wondering if anyone has managed to bridge two network adapters together with Fog in order to decrease the imaging time. At the moment we only have a entry level D-link switch, so imaging takes a while. If it is possible would this make a difference in any case?:eek:

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • K
        Kevin
        last edited by

        Trunking ports would make it go faster, however, the router/switch would need to support this. If you have an entry level D-link switch, more than likely it’s not supported. Is your switch a gigabit switch? If it’s not, that’ll be an easy upgrade to go and purchase a new one. If it is, and you would still like it to go faster, I would look into a business class switch that would need to support IEEE 802.3ad.

        "The quieter you become, the more you are able to hear"

        New to FOG? Check the [URL='http://www.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/FOGUserGuide']Wiki[/…

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • T
          TheJudgeMent
          last edited by

          Hi Kevin, thanks for the quick reply. We are planning on upgrading to a Cisco 3690G sometime in the near future. Yes it is a gigabit switch. At our current configuration imaging 12 computers with a 30 GB image takes roughly 4-5 hours.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Z
            Zardan
            last edited by

            Sounds like something else is wrong, at those speeds you should be barely be over 20% network load on a uncompressed image.
            A problem can be that your harddrive spends to much time seeking since it might need to read up to 12 different places at the same time. You might be able to get better performance if you start them at nearly the same time (try pause if one computer gets to far ahed before the other starts).

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • K
              Kevin
              last edited by

              Are you multicasting or imaging using the unicast?

              "The quieter you become, the more you are able to hear"

              New to FOG? Check the [URL='http://www.fogproject.org/wiki/index.php/FOGUserGuide']Wiki[/…

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • 1 / 1
              • First post
                Last post

              222

              Online

              12.0k

              Users

              17.3k

              Topics

              155.2k

              Posts
              Copyright © 2012-2024 FOG Project