I don’t know if it is any consolation but I use the Intel PRO MT desktop version and set promiscuous mode to allow all.

I greatly agree on Debian 7.

checking your DHCP leases for ‘NEWDEPLOY’ hostnames is a quick way I get to know if PCs are still in the process of joining domain etc… or if they have failed to do so.

No Problems deleting the partition. restored just fine.

I think the best option for you would be to make a backup of you Images folder and your database, and then scrub out 0.32 completely. Then install 0.33 from scratch, import your database and images folders, and then do the database modifications laid out in the wiki. Finally, run the installer one more time, then and only then, log in to the web gui. The only thing that I ran into after that is the TFTP settings that needed correction and for any clients that did not have an image associated I needed to open each host and select an image or the top dropdown option for none.

Yeah, $part is the correct variable. I saw this issue in 0.33 as well, and have since changed the calling to $part over $win7sys.

The error message you’re reporting is about USB, not about FOG or space.

in order to use the boot commands, you need to symlink undionly.kpxe to undionly.0 because of the appending .0 but then you can issue commands as normal, it seems after we got the dhcp-boot line correct the commands work again.

symlink undionly
[code]
cd /tftpboot
sudo ln -s undionly.kpxe undionly.0
[/code]

enable the boot lines
[code]
pxe-prompt=“Press F8 for boot menu”, 3

The known types are x86PC, PC98, IA64_EFI, Alpha, Arc_x86, Intel_Lean_Client, IA32_EFI, BC_EFI, Xscale_EFI and X86-64_EFI This option is first and will be the default if there is no input from the user.

pxe-service=X86PC, “Boot from network”, undionly
[/code]

Thank you for posting the code. I’d have done it, but I’m more focused on 0.33 so thank you for taking the time and posting the code you used.

Do backup. Please. Just always do backups before you do such things.

[quote=“DanielJay, post: 24805, member: 23088”]I decided to try downloading the image to one machine using unicast and that has failed. I am getting:
“Storage Node ‘DefaultMember’ is open, but has recently failed for this HOST
Unable to find a suitable Storage Node for transfer!”

I have since opened my /opt/fog/.fogsettings file and copied the value of password into the password field of my default storage node. I have also copied that same password into the TFTP settings on the config page.
After all of that was ran I restarted my NFS and TFTP servers. I am able to open up FileZilla and FTP to the FOG server using the fog user and that same password.

Any suggestions on this issue?[/quote]

Jaymes,
Any idea what might be causing this above issue?

Great thanks! I have ended up doing so but wanted to find out if there was a “best way” of doing this.

When you installed FOG did you install the language stuff with it?

Thanks jbsclm

Hi, There was an issue that we not in the app, this has now been updated. Should be rolled out in the next 48 hours.

What do you mean by, the snapins are host related by design? I don’t mind that I have to select them, but could you add a selection option in the Full Host Registration menu, through iPXE? I just want to be able to take a new machine out of the box, plug it in, boot to the FOG menu, go through Full Host Registration, add hostname, image ID, domain add option, and snapin option, then let it go on it’s merry way.

Right now, the only way I can achieve zero touch, is to manually create the host through the web interface. It would be nice to be able to select all the same settings though iPXE.

And in FOG we use Partclone and Partimage. The problem is we are using previously created services to complete the required task here. FOG is open source, it uses all open source pieces to complete the puzzle. These are free.

Ghost is a privately created and operated, it uses it’s own services specifically designed for Ghost, not a piece designed for something else but achieves the same goal. That is why ghost costs. They also have a development team… I know your heart is in the right place, but as long as you keep comparing FOG to another imaging solution that is maintained by a full team of devs, FOG is always going to seem to be lacking.

My corporation uses FOG because it is free and it is versatile.

Personally I tend to enjoy the fact of being able to over come my obstacles with my own knowledge of linux. I realize that not everyone has this experience, but if you continue to compare apples and oranges eventually your fruit will rot if you don’t eat it 🙂

THANK YOU GILOU!!!